ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0655

Blood pressure remains elevated in patients initiating voclosporin with low baseline blood pressure: evidence from patients in routine clinical care

Eric Roberts1, gabriela Schmajuk2 and Jinoos Yazdany3, 1University of California, San Francisco, SF, CA, 2University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 3UCSF, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Drug toxicity, Health Services Research, Heart disease, Lupus nephritis, registry

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0641–0670) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Hypertension was a common adverse event in RCTs testing voclosporin, an oral calcineurin inhibitor approved in 2021 to treat lupus nephritis (LN). In these trials, increases in blood pressure (BP) were generally transitory and frequently diminished after the first 4 weeks of use. Here we characterize BP changes in real-world data.

Methods: Data came from RISE, a national registry with electronic health records from over 1100 US rheumatologists. Voclosporin use was abstracted from medication tables. All systolic and diastolic BPs from 60 days before the first order to 90 days after the last order were tabulated. Baseline BP was defined as the lowest BP before the index date (inclusive) and categorized as follows: normal < 130 mmHg AND < 80 mmHg; elevated, 130-164 mmHg OR 80-104 mmHg; and high, ≥165 mmHg OR ≥105 mmHg. Covariates included age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance coverage, area deprivation index, BMI, smoking status, and time-varying antihypertensive drug use.We describe patient characteristics overall and stratified by whether the patient experienced an 8 mmHg increase in systolic BP (minimum clinically important difference (MCID)) during the first year of use. We calculated the median time to a MCID within a year for both systolic and diastolic using Kaplan Meier estimates. Finally, we present mean changes in BP between baseline and the lowest BP reading in windows of 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12 months after the index date.

Results: We included 287 patients: 83.6% were female, 32% were black; mean (SD) age was 41.4 (±14.1) years (Table 1). The mean systolic BP at baseline was 125.7 (±16.1)/79.2 (±10.8) (42.2% categorized as normal, 54% elevated, and 3.8% high). At baseline, 67.3% were on an antihypertensive medication. Overall, 63.8% experienced a systolic MCID, and 49.1% a diastolic MCID. The median time to a recorded increase in systolic was 77 days (95%CI: 62-91) (Figure 1), and 134 days (95%CI: 99-198) for diastolic. The average systolic/diastolic BP change was largest in the first month for patients with normal baseline BP 13.7 (±18.6)/6.0 (±13.8), and less pronounced for those with elevated BP 2.7 (±18.8)/-0.6 (±11.2); BP decreased for those with high baseline BP -7.9 (±17.8)/-7.3 (±16.5) (Figure 2). BPs were stable over time for those with baseline normal BP whereas BPs returned to baseline levels after 6 months for patients with elevated baseline BPs. Although the sample size was small for patients with high baseline BPs we observed large decreases in BP during the first 3 months of use, likely due to the beneficial effects of voclosporin on underlying LN.

Conclusion: >50% of patients using voclosporin had a MCID in the first year of use. Increases tend to occur in the first 3 months of use and on average were larger for patients with normal baseline BPs. In contrast to findings reported from RCTs, BP increases for patients with normal baseline BPs were persistent over 12 months. Although the MCID may seem small, it has been associated with up to 20% increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The clinical significance of BP changes related to voclosporin use warrant further investigation, especially since people with LN are already at increased risk for CVD.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of voclosporin patients in RISE overall and stratified by experiencing an 8 mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure during the first year of use.

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curve showing the time to an MCID in systolic blood pressure of 8 mmHg after initiating voclosporin.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Box and whisker plots of mean change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between baseline and the specified time stratified by patient’s baseline hypertension category.


Disclosures: E. Roberts: None; g. Schmajuk: None; J. Yazdany: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 5, Gilead, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Roberts E, Schmajuk g, Yazdany J. Blood pressure remains elevated in patients initiating voclosporin with low baseline blood pressure: evidence from patients in routine clinical care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/blood-pressure-remains-elevated-in-patients-initiating-voclosporin-with-low-baseline-blood-pressure-evidence-from-patients-in-routine-clinical-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/blood-pressure-remains-elevated-in-patients-initiating-voclosporin-with-low-baseline-blood-pressure-evidence-from-patients-in-routine-clinical-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology