ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0490

Infection Risks Associated with Monotherapy and Combination Therapies Using Biological or Targeted – DMARD in RA: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Li Liu1, Xue-Mei Zhang1, Zhi-Chun Gu1 and Jia Li2, 1Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School Of Medicine, Pu Dong Xin Qu, Shanghai, China (People's Republic), 2Department of Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Infection, meta-analysis, rheumatoid arthritis, risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0470–0505) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the infection risks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs), either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing infection risks in RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious infections, while the secondary outcomes included any infection and specific events such as respiratory tract infections, gastroenteritis and herpes zoster. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023435681).

Results: In this network meta-analysis of 127 RCTs involving 55,749 patients, b/tsDMARD monotherapy showed a similar risk of serious infections compared with csDMARDs. By contrast, combining csDMARDs with adalimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, or upadacitinib (though not with other b/tsDMARDs) significantly increased the risk of serious infections (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04-2.19; OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.09-2.81; OR 2.52, 95% CI: 1.26-5.03; OR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.13-4.73, respectively). For any infection, b/tsDMARD monotherapy posed a similar risk to csDMARDs, except for etanercept. Regarding specific risks, tsDMARDs were associated with an increased incidence of herpes zoster compared to csDMARDs, except for filgotinib and peficitinib. Although rare, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and sepsis were observed more frequently with infliximab combined with csDMARDs than with other b/tsDMARD regimens.

Conclusion: Compared to csDMARDs, b/tsDMARD monotherapy showed no elevated serious infection risk, whereas specific combination therapy regimens with csDMARDs increased the risk of serious infections in RA patients. A specialized clinical pathway with detailed recommendations was developed to assess infection risks and optimize drug selection for RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARD treatment.

Supporting image 1Figure 1 Network map of treatment comparisons for Serious infections

Links between the nodes indicated the available direct comparisons between different treatments. ABT, Abatacept; ADA, Adalimumab, ANA, Anakinra, BARI, Baricitinib; CZP, Certolizumab; ETN, Etanercept; FILGO, Filgotinib; GLM, Golimumab; IFX, Infliximab; PEFI, Peficitinib; PBO, Placebo; RTX, Rituximab, SAR, Sarilumab; TCZ, Tocilizumab; TOFA, Tofacitinib; UPA, Upadacitinib; csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Supporting image 2Table 1 A heat map ranking b/tsDMARDs ± csDMARDs based on the risk of serious infections, any infection, and specfic infectious outcomes

Numbers reflect P-score, which rank b/tsDMARDs ± csDMARDs on a continuous scale from 0 to 1. A higher P-score indicates a greater increase in risk of infection. Transverse line indicate that data were not available. ABT, Abatacept; ADA, Adalimumab, ANA, Anakinra, BARI, Baricitinib; CZP, Certolizumab; ETN, Etanercept; FILGO, Filgotinib; GLM, Golimumab; IFX, Infliximab; PEFI, Peficitinib; PBO, Placebo; RTX, Rituximab, SAR, Sarilumab; TCZ, Tocilizumab; TOFA, Tofacitinib; UPA, Upadacitinib, bDMARDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; tsDMARDs, targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Infection Risk Management Protocol in Rheumatoid Arthritis

RA, rheumatoid arthritis; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; csDMARDs, conven-tional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; bDMARDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; tsDMARDs, targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; IL-1Ra, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.


Disclosures: L. Liu: None; X. Zhang: None; Z. Gu: None; J. Li: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liu L, Zhang X, Gu Z, Li J. Infection Risks Associated with Monotherapy and Combination Therapies Using Biological or Targeted – DMARD in RA: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/infection-risks-associated-with-monotherapy-and-combination-therapies-using-biological-or-targeted-dmard-in-ra-a-systematic-review-and-network-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/infection-risks-associated-with-monotherapy-and-combination-therapies-using-biological-or-targeted-dmard-in-ra-a-systematic-review-and-network-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology