ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0470

Characterization of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on Distinct Patterns of Pain Improvement Following Treatment With Filgotinib: A Post Hoc Analysis of FINCH 1

Peter Taylor1, Yoshiya Tanaka2, Louis Dron3, Katrien Van Beneden4, Gerd Burmester5 and Bruno Fautrel6, 1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3Cytel, Toronto, Canada, 4Alfasigma S.p.A., Bologna, Italy, 5Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 6Sorbonne Université - APHP, Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm UMRS 1136-5, PARIS, France, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), pain, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0470–0505) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Janus kinase inhibitors have been shown to ameliorate pain as well as inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Pain response trajectories were modeled in patients treated with filgotinib in the FINCH 1 trial.

Methods: FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) was a 52-week trial in which patients with RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) received filgotinib 200 mg or 100 mg, adalimumab or placebo, each with MTX. Patients reported pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible). Moderate pain was defined as a score of 40–60 mm, with scores >60 mm indicating severe pain. Group-based trajectory modeling1 was used to identify patient groups with similar pain responses over a 12-month period.

Results: Among patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg (n=475), modeling produced five distinct groups of pain response trajectory (Figure). Age, disease duration and erosion score were similar across all groups at baseline. Groups A and B (45% of patients) had a rapid reduction in pain in the first 3 months, with the improvement maintained over 12 months. Group A had the greatest reduction in pain. Groups C and D (35% of patients) had a slower response but achieved a 50% pain reduction after 6 months. Group E (20% of patients) had severe pain at baseline (mean VAS pain approx. 75 mm) and persistent, moderate pain over 12 months. Mean VAS pain score was < 40 mm at Month 3 in Groups A, B and C (approx. 60% of patients) and at Month 6 in Groups A, B, C and D (80% of patients). At Months 3, 6 and 12, the greatest absolute changes in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores were seen in patients with the most rapid pain responses (Groups A and B) (Table). At Month 6, 50% of patients in Group A and 53% in Group B were in remission (by Clinical Disease Activity Index), compared with 3% in Group E (noted for highest median DAS28-CRP and lowest [worst] median SF-36 PCS score at baseline). At Months 6 and 12, the greatest improvements in patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease activity occurred in Group A. Lack of efficacy was the most common reason for discontinuation in Group E (10.5%); 2.1% discontinued due to adverse events. In Groups A, B, C and D, the leading reason for discontinuation was adverse events (6.1%, 4.4%, 7.0% and 8.5%, respectively), followed by lack of efficacy (5.1%, 2.7%, 5.8% and 7.3%, respectively). Similar pain trajectories were observed in patients receiving filgotinib 100 mg (n=480).

Conclusion: Of patients with prior inadequate response to MTX treated with filgotinib 200 mg, 80% achieved a substantial reduction in pain within 6 months. The most rapid pain responses with filgotinib were associated with the greatest improvements in other disease-related measures. Overall, these data illustrate the heterogeneity of treatment response in patients with RA and underscore the importance of communicating realistic expectations and timelines to patients.Reference: 1. Nagin DS, et al. Stat Methods Med Res 2018;27:2015–23.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: P. Taylor: AbbVie, 2, Acelyrin, Inc., 2, Alfasigma S.p.A., 2, 5, Biogen, 2, Eli Lilly & Co., 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Gilead, 2, Immunovant, 2, Moonlake, 2, Nordic Pharma, 2, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; Y. Tanaka: AbbVie, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, BMS, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 6, Chugai, 6, Daiichi Sankyo, 6, Eisai, 6, Eli Lilly & Co., 6, Gilead, 6, GSK, 6, IQVIA, 6, Otsuka, 6, Taisho, 6, UCB, 6; L. Dron: None; K. Van Beneden: Alfasigma S.p.A., 3, Galapagos, 3; G. Burmester: Celltrion, 6, Chugai, 6, Fresenius, 6, Gedeon Richter, 6, Sanofi, 6; B. Fautrel: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Chugai, 2, Eli Lilly & Co., 2, 5, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, Medac, 2, MSD, 2, 5, Nordic Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, OW KIN, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, SOBI, 2, UCB, 2, Viatris, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Taylor P, Tanaka Y, Dron L, Van Beneden K, Burmester G, Fautrel B. Characterization of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on Distinct Patterns of Pain Improvement Following Treatment With Filgotinib: A Post Hoc Analysis of FINCH 1 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characterization-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-based-on-distinct-patterns-of-pain-improvement-following-treatment-with-filgotinib-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-finch-1/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characterization-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-based-on-distinct-patterns-of-pain-improvement-following-treatment-with-filgotinib-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-finch-1/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology