ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0332

Safety, Short- and Long-Term Efficacy of Methotrexate in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohamed Abdelsalam1, Maryam Lasheen2, Hadeer Hafez3, Bassant Elaraby Elsayed Badwy4, Omar Sameh Nabil El Sedafy1 and Mohamed Reda Awad5, 1Misr University For Science and Technology, 6 october, Al Jizah, Egypt, 2Misr University For Science and Technology, Helwan, Al Qahirah, Egypt, 36th October University, 6 october, Al Jizah, Egypt, 4Misr University For Science and Technology, Nasr City, Al Qahirah, Egypt, 5Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, Giza, Al Jizah, Egypt

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), meta-analysis, Osteoarthritis, pain, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0306–0336) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX), traditionally used for inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, has well-established anti-inflammatory properties, recently gained interest as a potential therapeutic option for osteoarthritis (OA). Current treatments largely focus on symptom management, with limited options for altering disease course. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MTX in reducing OA symptoms in both the short and long term.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, and Scopus from inception to April 22, 2025. Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of MTX in OA were included (Fig. 1). The primary outcome was pain, measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Outcomes were stratified by follow-up duration: short-term (less than 6 months), medium-term (6 months and 9 months), and long-term (12 months). Data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan) software.

Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 studies in the qualitative synthesis and 8 in the meta-analysis, encompassing 1251 and 649 patients, respectively. MTX significantly reduced pain (SMD: –0.47; 95% CI: –0.68 to –0.26). Subgroup analyses by treatment duration showed SMDs of –0.46 (95% CI: –0.75 to –0.17) at < 6 months, –0.75 (95% CI: –1.2 to –0.29) at 6 months, –0.42 (95% CI: –1.35 to 0.51) at 9 months, and –0.06 (95% CI: –0.46 to 0.34) at 12 months. For the WOMAC score, MTX had a significant overall effect (SMD: –0.71; 95% CI: –1.2 to –0.22), with subgroup SMDs of –0.45 (95% CI: –0.88 to –0.01) at < 6 months, –1.81 (95% CI: –4.56 to 0.94) at 6 months, –0.37 (95% CI: –0.78 to 0.04) at 9 months, and –0.27 (95% CI: –0.68 to 0.13) at 12 months. For physical function, the overall effect was significant (SMD: –0.53; 95% CI: –0.84 to –0.23), with subgroup SMDs of –0.46 (95% CI: –0.76 to –0.16) at < 6 months, –0.88 (95% CI: –1.73 to –0.03) at 6 months, –0.35 (95% CI: –0.81 to 0.12) at 9 months, and –0.19 (95% CI: –0.58 to 0.19) at 12 months. On stiffness, MTX also had an overall significant effect (SMD: –0.44; 95% CI: –0.65 to –0.23). Subgroup SMDs were –0.33 (95% CI: –0.68 to 0.01) at < 6 months, –0.52 (95% CI: –0.81 to –0.24) at 6 months, –0.39 (95% CI: –1.49 to 0.72) at 9 months, and –0.34 (95% CI: –1.43 to 0.75) at 12 months (Fig. 2). Our results stated that there is an overall significant difference in adverse events (AEs) (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94), with a significant difference in mild AEs (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.97) and no significant difference in serious AEs (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.34) (Fig. 3).

Conclusion: MTX provides significant short- and medium-term improvements in pain, stiffness, and physical function in OA, with the most pronounced benefit observed at 6 months. However, its safety profile in real-world settings requires more thorough investigation. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term efficacy.

Supporting image 1Figure (1) PRISMA Flow Chart Illustrating Search Strategy and Selection of Included Studies

Supporting image 2Figure (2) Forest Plots of Treatment Effects for MTX in OA by Follow-Up Duration. (A) Pain Reduction (Fixed-Effects Model): Subgroups: < 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Ferrero et al. 2021, Holanda et al. 2007, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Wenham 2013. 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Wang et al. 2023, Wenham 2013. 9 months: Studies included: Kingsbury et al. 2024. 12 months: Studies included: Ferrero et al. 2021, Kingsbury et al. 2024. Overall: Significant standardized mean difference (SMD) in pain reduction: -0.46 (95% CI: -0.64 to -0.27), with low heterogeneity (I2=19%). Test for overall effect: Z=4.89 (P < 0.00001). Test for subgroup differences: χ2=6.05, df=3 (P=0.11), I2=50.4%.

(A) Pain Reduction (Random-Effects Model): Studies included: Same as fixed-effects model. Overall: Significant SMD: -0.47 (95% CI: -0.68 to -0.26), with a heterogeneity of (I2=19%). Test for overall effect: Z=4.33 (P < 0.0001). Test for subgroup differences: χ2=5.11, df=3 (P=0.16), I2=41.3%.

(B) WOMAC Improvement (Fixed-Effects Model): Subgroups: < 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Ghosh 2020, Holanda et al. 2007, Kingsbury et al. 2024. 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Kingsbury et al. 2024. 9 months: Studies included: Kingsbury et al. 2024. 12 months: Studies included: Kingsbury et al. 2024. Overall: Significant SMD in WOMAC improvement: -0.54 (95% CI: -0.70 to -0.39), with Considerable heterogeneity (I2=90%). Test for overall effect: Z=6.89 (P < 0.00001). Test for subgroup differences: χ2=12.26, df=3 (P=0.007), I2=75.5%. (C) Stiffness Reduction (Fixed-Effects Model): Subgroups: < 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Holanda et al. 2007, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Strebkova 2024, Wenham 2013. 6 months: Studies included: Enteshari-Moghaddam et al. 2019, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Strebkova 2024, Wang et al. 2023, Wenham 2013. 9 months: Studies included: Kingsbury et al. 2024. 12 months: Studies included: Kingsbury et al. 2024. Overall: Significant SMD in stiffness reduction: -0.44 (95% CI: -0.65 to -0.23), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Test for overall effect: Z=4.05 (P < 0.0001). Test for subgroup differences: χ2=0.74, df=3 (P=0.86), (I2=0%) Pain, WOMAC and stiffness reduction showed consistent benefits across time points, with the largest effects at 6 months. Heterogeneity was negligible for stiffness and pain but substantial for WOMAC.

CI, confidence interval; SMD, standardized mean difference; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; I2, heterogeneity index; df, degrees of freedom.

Supporting image 3Figure (3) Forest Plot of Adverse Events (AEs) Associated with MTX in Osteoarthritis. MAEs: Subgroup: Studies included: Ferrero et al. 2021, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Wang et al. 2023. Overall: Significant reduction in MAEs with MTX (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.97), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Test for overall effect: Z=2.27 (P=0.02). SAEs: Subgroup: Studies included: Ferrero et al. 2021, Kingsbury et al. 2024, Wang et al. 2023. Overall: Non-significant reduction in SAEs with MTX (RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.31–1.34), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Test for overall effect: Z=1.17 (P=0.24). Total (MAEs + SAEs): Overall: Significant reduction in total AEs with MTX (RR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.60–0.94), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Test for overall effect: Z=2.55 (P=0.01). Test for subgroup differences (MAE vs. SAE): χ2=0.20, df=1 (P=0.66), I2=0%. MTX demonstrated a significant reduction in total adverse events, driven primarily by MAEs. SAEs showed a non-significant trend toward reduction and also studies reported that SAEs were not related to MTX. No heterogeneity was observed across studies, and subgroup differences were negligible. CI, confidence interval; MAE, mild adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event; RR, risk ratio; I2, heterogeneity index; df, degrees of freedom.


Disclosures: M. Abdelsalam: None; M. Lasheen: None; H. Hafez: None; B. Badwy: None; O. El Sedafy: None; M. Awad: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Abdelsalam M, Lasheen M, Hafez H, Badwy B, El Sedafy O, Awad M. Safety, Short- and Long-Term Efficacy of Methotrexate in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-short-and-long-term-efficacy-of-methotrexate-in-osteoarthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-short-and-long-term-efficacy-of-methotrexate-in-osteoarthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology