ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0257

Safety of Guselkumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Up to 1 Year: Integrated Safety Analysis of Phase 2 and 3 Studies in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Bruce E. Sands1, Remo Panaccione2, Silvio Danese3, Julián Panés4, Tadakazu Hisamatsu5, Geert D’Haens6, Rian Van Rampelbergh7, Mobolaji Olurinde8, Jacqueline Yee8, Karissa Lozenski9, Thomas Baker8, Shadi Yarandi8, Matthew Germinaro8, Marion L. Vetter8, Hewei Li8, Mauricio Rosas Ballina10, Jessica R. Allegretti11, Anita Afzali12 and David T. Rubin13, 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA, NY, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, AB, Canada, 3Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, Milano, Italy, 4Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona, Spain, 5Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 6Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, D’Haens, Swaziland, 7Johnson & Johnson, Antwerp, Belgium, Antwerp, Belgium, 8Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA, USA, PA, 9Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 10Actelion Research & Development, Allschwil, Switzerland, Allschwil, Switzerland, 11Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, MA, 12University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA, OH, 13University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Autoinflammatory diseases, clinical trial, Inflammation, Ulcers

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0233–0279) Miscellaneous Rheumatic & Inflammatory Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor that potently neutralizes IL-23 and binds to CD64 (a receptor on cells that produce IL-23), is currently approved in the United States for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and worldwide for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. While GUS has been shown to be safe in Crohn’s disease (CD) and UC, safety results have only been reported in individual trials to date. To characterize the overall safety profile of GUS in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we evaluated pooled safety data from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of GUS in CD and UC.

Methods: Participants with moderately to severely active CD (n=1492; GALAXI 1, 2, & 3, and GRAVITI studies) or UC (n=1514; QUASAR Induction Study 1, Induction Study 2, & Maintenance Study and VEGA-GUS monotherapy arm only) were assigned to GUS 200 mg intravenous (IV) or 400 mg subcutaneous (SC) induction (GRAVITI only) at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by GUS 100 mg SC every 8 weeks or 200 mg SC every 4 weeks; or placebo (PBO). SC maintenance treatment continued through approximately 1 year. GUS studies were pooled for the induction period (GALAXI, GRAVITI, & QUASAR; IV and SC, Weeks 0-12 [VEGA excluded due to no PBO control]) and through 1 year (GALAXI, GRAVITI, QUASAR, & VEGA). In this pooled analysis, safety events were normalized to 100 participant-years (PY) of follow-up with corresponding confidence intervals.

Results: Through Week 12, 1703 participants were treated with GUS with 399.9 PY of follow-up. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar between participants treated with GUS (200 mg IV or 400 mg SC) and PBO (Figure 1A). AEs occurred at a rate of 202.82/100 PY and 223.26/100 PY, serious AEs at 11.75/100 PY and 28.56/100 PY, AEs leading to study agent discontinuation at 5.50/100 PY and 16.32/100 PY, and serious infections at 1.50/100 PY and 1.17/100 PY, for GUS and PBO, respectively. Through 1 year, 2057 participants were treated with GUS, with 1752.1 PY of follow-up. Rates of AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and serious infections, were no higher in GUS-treated than PBO-treated participants (Figure 1B). Through 1 year, no anaphylactic or serum sickness reactions were reported, and rates of malignancy, opportunistic infection, major adverse cardiovascular event, and clinically important hepatic disorders were low (Table 1). In GUS-treated participants, one participant (from an endemic region) reported active tuberculosis, and 2 deaths (acute myocardial infarction in a participant with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors and non-suicidal gunshot wound, respectively) occurred.

Conclusion: Through 1 year of treatment, GUS demonstrated a favorable safety profile comparable to PBO in participants with CD and UC. No new safety concerns were identified.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Key safety events in phase 2/3 IBD clinical studies during the induction period (Week 0-12) (A) and through 1 year (B)

Supporting image 2Table 1: Targeted adverse events during the induction period and through 1 year; exposure-adjusted rates of events per 100 participant-years (PY) of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals (CI)


Disclosures: B. Sands: AbbVie, 2, Abivax, 2, 6, Adiso Therapeutics, 2, Agomab, 2, Alimentiv, 2, Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Arena Pharmaceuticals, 2, Artugen Therapeutics, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biolojic Design, 2, Biora Therapeutics, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Boston Pharmaceuticals, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Calibr, 2, Celgene, 2, Celltrion, 2, ClostraBio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Enthera, 2, Envied Biosciences, 2, Equillium, 2, Evommune, 2, Ferring, 2, Fiat, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Galapagos, 2, Genentech (Roche), 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, Gossamer Bio, 2, GSK, 2, Imhotex, 2, Index Pharmaceuticals, 2, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, 2, Inotrem, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Kaleido, 2, Kallyope, 2, Merck, 2, Microba, 2, Mobius Care, 2, Morphic Therapeutics, 2, MRM Health, 2, Nexus Therapeutics, 2, Nimbus, 2, Odyssey, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Progenity, 2, Prometheus Biosciences, 2, Prometheus Laboratories, 2, Protagonist Therapeutics, 2, Q32 Bio, 2, Rasayana Therapeutics, 2, Recludix Therapeutics, 2, Reistone Biopharma, 2, Sanofi, 2, Spyre Therapeutics, 2, Sun Pharma, 2, Surrozen, 2, Takeda, 2, 5, 6, Target RWE, 2, Teva, 2, Theravance Biopharma, 2, 5, 6, TLL Pharmaceutical, 2, Tr1X, 2, Union Therapeutics, 2, Ventyx Biopharma, 2, 11; R. Panaccione: AbbiVax, 2, Abbott, 2, AbbVie, 2, Alimentiv, 2, Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Arena Pharmaceuticals, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, 2, Eisai, 2, Elan, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Ferring, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Galapagos, 2, Genentech, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, GSK, 2, JAMP Bio, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 2, Mylan, 2, Novartis, 2, Oppilan Pharma, 2, Organon, 2, Pandion Pharma, 2, Pendopharm, 2, Pfizer, 2, Progenity, 2, Prometheus Biosciences, 2, Protagonist Therapeutics, 2, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, Satisfai Health, 2, Shire, 2, Spyre Therapeutics, 2, Sublimity Therapeutics, 2, Takeda, 2, Theravance Biopharma, 2, Trellus, 2, UCB, 2, Union Biopharma, 2, Ventyx Biopharma, 2, Viatris, 2; S. Danese: AbbVie, 2, 6, Alimentiv, 2, Allergan, 2, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, Athos, 2, Biogen, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Enthera, 2, Ferring, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Hospira, 2, Inotrem, 2, Janssen, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 2, MSD, 2, Mundipharma, 2, Mylan, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, Sublimity Therapeutics, 2, Takeda, 2, 6, TiGenix, 2, UCB, 2, Vifor, 2; J. Panés: AbbVie, 2, Alimentiv, 2, 12, has served on a data safety monitoring board, Athos, 2, Atomwise, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celsius, 2, Ferring, 2, Galapagos, 2, Genentech/Roche, 2, GSK, 2, Janssen, 2, Mirum, 2, 12, has served on a data safety monitoring board, Nimbus, 2, Pfizer, 2, Progenity, 2, Prometheus, 2, Protagonist Therapeutics, 2, Revolo, 2, Sanofi, 2, 12, has served on a data safety monitoring board, Sorriso, 2, 12, has served on a data safety monitoring board, Surrozen, 2, 12, has served on a data safety monitoring board, Takeda, 2, Wasserman, 2; T. Hisamatsu: AbbVie GK, 2, 5, 6, Abivax, 2, Boston Scientific Corporation, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, EA Pharma Co. Ltd, 2, 5, 6, Gilead, 2, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., 2, 6, JIMRO Co. Ltd., 5, 6, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 5, 6, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 5, 6, Lilly, 2, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 2, 5, 6, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 5, 6, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., 5, Pfizer Inc., 2, 5, 6, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 5, 6, Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 5; G. D’Haens: AbbVie, 2, 6, 12, data monitoring board activities, Agomab, 2, AMT, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 12, data monitoring board activities, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, 12, data monitoring board activities, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Exeliom, 2, Galapagos, 2, 6, 12, data monitoring board activities, Gossamerbio, 2, GSK, 2, Immunic, 2, Index, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Kaleido, 2, Origo, 2, Pfizer, 2, 6, Polpharma, 2, Procise Diagnostics, 2, Progenity, 2, Prometheus Biosciences, 2, Prometheus Laboratories, 2, Protagonist Therapeutics, 2, Seres Health, 12, data monitoring board activities, Takeda, 6; R. Rampelbergh: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; M. Olurinde: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; J. Yee: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; K. Lozenski: BMS, 11, Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; T. Baker: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; S. Yarandi: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; M. Germinaro: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; M. Vetter: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; H. Li: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; M. Ballina: Actelion Research & Development, 3, 11; J. Allegretti: AbbVie, 2, 6, Adiso, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Ferring, 2, Genentech, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Janssen, 12,, 2, 5, 6, 12, Steering committee member, Merck, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roivant, 2, Seres Therapeutics, 2; A. Afzali: AbbVie, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Bristol Myers Squibb, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Celgene, 12, potential conflicts of interest, DiaSorin, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Eli Lilly, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Gilead Sciences, 12, potential conflicts of interest, IBD Horizons, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Janssen, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Pfizer, 12, potential conflicts of interest, Takeda, 12, potential conflicts of interest, TLL Pharmaceuticals, 12, potential conflicts of interest; D. Rubin: AbbVie, 1, 2, 6, Altrubio, 1, 2, 6, 11, Apex, 1, 2, 6, Avalo, 1, 2, 6, 12, reports potential conflicts of interest, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, 6, Buhlmann Diagnostics Corp, 1, 2, 6, Celgene, 1, 2, 6, Connect BioPharma, 1, 2, 6, Cornerstones Health, Inc, 12, Membership on the Board of Directors, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, 12, Board of Trustees, Datos Health, 11, Intouch Group, 1, 2, 6, Iterative Health, 1, 2, 6, 11, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), 1, 2, 6, 12, reports potential conflicts of interest with, Lilly, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 6, Samsung Neurologica, 1, 2, 6, Takeda, 1, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sands B, Panaccione R, Danese S, Panés J, Hisamatsu T, D’Haens G, Rampelbergh R, Olurinde M, Yee J, Lozenski K, Baker T, Yarandi S, Germinaro M, Vetter M, Li H, Ballina M, Allegretti J, Afzali A, Rubin D. Safety of Guselkumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Up to 1 Year: Integrated Safety Analysis of Phase 2 and 3 Studies in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-guselkumab-in-inflammatory-bowel-disease-up-to-1-year-integrated-safety-analysis-of-phase-2-and-3-studies-in-crohns-disease-and-ulcerative-colitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-guselkumab-in-inflammatory-bowel-disease-up-to-1-year-integrated-safety-analysis-of-phase-2-and-3-studies-in-crohns-disease-and-ulcerative-colitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology