ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0137

Landscape of Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Clinical Spectrum, Serology, and Predictors of Damage in a Single Center Cohort of 233 Patients

RITESH KUMAR MISHRA1, SUBIN PHILIP2, JAIDEV MENON2, RIZWANA NAUSHAD2, AISHWARYA GOPAL3, CHRISTINA MARIASELVAM2, Chengappa Kavadichanda2, Molly mary Thabah3 and VIR SINGH NEGI2, 1JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, Bhubaneswar, India, 2JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, PUDUCHERRY, Puducherry, India, 3JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, PUDUCHERRY, India

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, Autoantibody(ies), Cohort Study, Damage Index, Myocardial Infarction

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0115–0144) Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) a systemic autoimmune prothrombotic disorder with long-term consequences. While secondary APS is well studied, large real-world cohorts of primary APS remain scarce. We characterised the clinical, serological, and damage profiles of patients with primary APS and identified predictors of irreversible damage using the Damage Index for APS (DIAPS).

Methods: This retrospective study included 233 primary APS patients meeting the 2006 Sydney criteria for primary APS. Clinical features, antibody profiles, obstetric outcomes, and DIAPS were analyzed. High damage was defined as DIAPS ≥3. Subgroup analyses were performed in thrombotic APS (n=185) and obstetric-only APS (n=48). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of high damage.

Results: Clinical spectrum: Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years (range 0.5–12.7), 107 (45.9%) had thrombotic-only APS, 78 (33.4%) had both thrombotic and obstetric APS, and 48 (20.6%) had obstetric-only APS (Fig. 1A). In the thrombotic subgroup (n=185), median age was 29 years (range 14–63), and 82.2% were female. Venous thrombosis occurred in 106 (57.8%), arterial events in 63 (34%), microvascular involvement in 27 (14.5%), and CAPS in 4 (1.7%) patients. Neurological manifestations seen were stroke/TIA: n=39 (21.1%); CVT: n=27 (14.6%); Chorea in n=3 (1.2%). Cardiac involvement included valvular lesions in 19 (8.1%), MI in 8 (4.3%). Hematological features included thrombocytopenia in 65 (27.8%) and AIHA in 16 (6.8%) (Table 1). Renal involvement (n=19, 8.2%) included aPL nephropathy (n=10) and immune-mediated glomerular injury (n=9). MI, cutaneous ulcers, and arterial thrombosis were more frequent in males (p< 0.05). Arterial events were numerically more common in patients with triple positivity, LAC, or high-risk aPL profiles (Fig.1B).In obstetric-only APS (n=48), the median number of pregnancies was 3 (IQR 2–3.25), with a high burden of first-trimester loss and adverse outcomes such as preeclampsia or low birth weight in 22.2%.Serological: Of the total 233 patients, 178 (76.4%) had high-risk aPL profiles, 57 (24.5%) were triple-positive, and 83 (35.6%) had single aPL positivity.Damage Index: The median DIAPS score was 1.0 (IQR 0–2, range 0–6); 65.9% had some damage and 17.8% had high damage. The most frequently involved domains were peripheral vascular (44.9%), neuropsychiatric (21.1%), cardiovascular (14.1%), and cutaneous (8.1%) (Figure 1C).On multivariable analysis, age ≥30 (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5–10.1), male sex (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1–8.0), and IgG β2GP1 high titers (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1–8.4) independently predicted high DIAPS (Figure 1D). Hypertension showed a trend in the univariate analysis (table 2) but did not retain statistical significance in the multivariate model for prediction of high damage index.

Conclusion: This large single-center cohort highlights the clinical heterogeneity and damage burden in primary APS. Notably, CVT rates were higher than reported in international APS cohorts. Older age, male sex, and high IgG β2GP1 titers independently predicted irreversible damage. These findings underscore the need for early risk stratification to guide personalized monitoring and care.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: R. MISHRA: None; S. PHILIP: None; J. MENON: None; R. NAUSHAD: None; A. GOPAL: None; C. MARIASELVAM: None; C. Kavadichanda: None; M. Thabah: None; V. NEGI: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

MISHRA R, PHILIP S, MENON J, NAUSHAD R, GOPAL A, MARIASELVAM C, Kavadichanda C, Thabah M, NEGI V. Landscape of Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Clinical Spectrum, Serology, and Predictors of Damage in a Single Center Cohort of 233 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/landscape-of-primary-antiphospholipid-syndrome-clinical-spectrum-serology-and-predictors-of-damage-in-a-single-center-cohort-of-233-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/landscape-of-primary-antiphospholipid-syndrome-clinical-spectrum-serology-and-predictors-of-damage-in-a-single-center-cohort-of-233-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology