ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2021

The Dual Benefits of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Recurrent Nephrolithiasis and Gout Flares Among Gout Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: New User, Active Comparator Target Trial Emulation Studies

Natalie McCormick1, Chio Yokose2, Leo Lu3, Deborah Wexler1, J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta4, Mary A. De Vera5, saiajay chigurupati1, Kiara Tan1, Chixiang Chen6, Rozalina McCoy6, Gary Curhan7 and Hyon K. Choi8, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Waltham, MA, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Arthritis Research Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5University of British Columbia, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 7Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 8Massachusetts General Hospital, Lexington, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Administrative Data, Comorbidity, comparative effectiveness, gout, Pharmacoepidemiology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Nephrolithiasis and gout are both common, extremely painful conditions which frequently coexist, along with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), first approved for T2D, increase urinary flow with osmotic diuresis and uric acid excretion, both which could impact nephrolithiasis risk.  However, data on SGLT2i and nephrolithiasis recurrence are limited, and not available among gout patients.

Our objective was to compare risk of recurrent nephrolithiasis and gout flares among gout patients with T2D initiating SGLT2i versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), all contemporary second-line glucose lowering agents.

Methods: We designed and conducted target trial emulations (TTEs) to compare SGLT2i vs GLP1RA or DPP4i for risk of recurrent nephrolithiasis among adults with T2D and preexisting nephrolithiasis overall (TTE#1), and among the subset also with preexisting gout (TTE#2).  We used a Canadian general population database from Jan 2014 to June 2022, including all dispensed prescriptions.  Randomization was emulated using inverse probability of treatment weights (primary analysis) and overlap weighting (sensitivity analysis) based on > 50 preexposure variables including duration and severity of gout, nephrolithiasis, and T2D. 

Nephrolithiasis episodes were ascertained by emergency department (ED), hospitalisation, or outpatient visits (PPV ≥90% [Semins et al. 2010]).  Secondary outcomes included nephrolithiasis resulting in hospitalization/ED visits and requiring procedures.  We also assessed rate of recurrent gout flares, ascertained from ED, hospitalization, outpatient, and medication dispensing records (PPV 95% for≥ 1 flare over a similar period). 

We included genital infection as positive control and appendicitis as negative control outcomes. Weighted Poisson and Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate rate ratios (RR), hazard ratios, and rate differences (RD).

 

Results: Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after inverse probability weighting (all SMD < 0.1). Rates of recurrent nephrolithiasis were lower among those initiating SGLT2i vs GLP1RA or DPP4i (Table 1).  Comparing SGLT2i vs GLP1RA among patients with preexisting gout, RR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.79) and RD was -53 events (-78, -27) per 1000 person-years [PY]). 

SGLT2i initiation was also associated with reduced rate of recurrent gout flares, with RR 0.72 (0.54, 0.95) and RD -16 flares [-31, -1.2] per 1000 PY) (Table 2).

Findings were consistent using DPP4i as the active comparator (Tables 1-2) and using overlap weighting.  Protective associations also persisted for nephrolithiasis requiring ED visits/hospitalizations or procedures (Table 1), while SGLT2i initiators had higher risk of genital infection, and no altered risk of appendicitis, as expected (Table 3).

Conclusion: The dual added benefits of SGLT2i for gout patients beyond established diabetes therapy (i.e., reduced rate of recurrent nephrolithiasis and gout flares) suggest this class of medication may be an ideal multi-purpose addition to current gout or nephrolithiasis therapies to address the high burden of flares, stone, and comorbidities.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Recurrent nephrolithiasis event counts among nephrolithiasis patients with type 2 diabetes initiating SGLT2i versus GLP1-RA or DPP-4i, after inverse probability of treatment weighting

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Recurrent gout flare counts among nephrolithiasis patients with gout and type 2 diabetes initiating SGLT2i versus GLP1-RA or DPP-4i, after inverse probability of treatment weighting

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Control outcomes among nephrolithiasis patients with type 2 diabetes initiating SGLT2i versus GLP1-RA or DPP-4i, after inverse probability of treatment weighting


Disclosures: N. McCormick: None; C. Yokose: None; L. Lu: None; D. Wexler: Novo Nordisk, 1; J. Avina-Zubieta: None; M. De Vera: None; s. chigurupati: None; K. Tan: None; C. Chen: None; R. McCoy: Emmi® (Wolters Kluwer), 2; G. Curhan: GSK, 5, OM1, Inc, 4; H. Choi: Ani, 1, Horizon, 1, 5, LG, 1, Protalix, 1, Shanton, 12, DSMB.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McCormick N, Yokose C, Lu L, Wexler D, Avina-Zubieta J, De Vera M, chigurupati s, Tan K, Chen C, McCoy R, Curhan G, Choi H. The Dual Benefits of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Recurrent Nephrolithiasis and Gout Flares Among Gout Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: New User, Active Comparator Target Trial Emulation Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-dual-benefits-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2-inhibitors-for-recurrent-nephrolithiasis-and-gout-flares-among-gout-patients-with-type-2-diabetes-new-user-active-comparator-target-trial-emulatio/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-dual-benefits-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2-inhibitors-for-recurrent-nephrolithiasis-and-gout-flares-among-gout-patients-with-type-2-diabetes-new-user-active-comparator-target-trial-emulatio/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology