ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1992

Gout FlaresFollowingImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment

Austen herron1, Miao Ting Lai2, Naomi Schlesinger3, Sauer brian4, Jorge Rojas5, shardool Patel3, Madeline O’Sullivan3, grant Cannon6 and Tawnie Braaten3, 1Salt Lake City VA and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, salt lake city, 3University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Salt Lake City VA/University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Seattle VA, Mexico, Mexico, 6University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: gout, immunology

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) produce immune-related adverse events in patients with rheumatic diseases that can often present as a flare of the underlying condition. Efforts to understand these events have primarily focused on patients with traditionally recognized autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, but have not addressed the impact of ICIs in autoinflammatory diseases such as gout.  Gout flares have been reported following ICI treatment, but there are no population-based investigations of the impact of ICI treatment in gout.  This study assessed the incidence, features, and potential risk factors associated with gout flares following ICI treatment in Veterans receiving care in rheumatology clinics in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods: US Veterans enrolled in VHA who had received an ICI and had a rheumatology clinic visit within 6 months after first ICI infusion were identified. Electronic medical record (EMR) review classified patients as having established gout if the diagnosis was documented prior to ICI infusion by a rheumatology provider. For each patient with an established gout diagnosis, EMR review during the six months after ICI infusion applied the following criteria to identify gout flares:  1) patient or provider report of a flare and 2) at least one associated symptom/sign of warmth, swelling, and/or pain; and/or treatment of the flare with corticosteroids, NSAIDS, or colchicine.  Features of gout recorded included history of previous flares, past use of urate lowering therapy (ULT), tophi, and documentation of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals were recorded.   Data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) was extracted to provide basic demographic and laboratory data.

Results: Of the 34,344 patients receiving ICI therapy in VHA, 308 had rheumatology appointments within 6 months after ICI infusion. Of these 308 patients, 35 (11.3%) had an established prior diagnosis of gout. Of the 35 gout patients, 17 (48.5%) met criteria for an acute gout flare within six months of ICI treatment. These patients were 100% male, predominantly white, and with a mean age at ICI initiation of 71.1 years (Table 1). The clinical features and treatment of flares are reported in Table 2. Treatment of flares with medication was reported in 14 of the 17 patients, colchicine being the most common drug chosen.  The small sample size limits the interpretation of potential risk factors.  A potential signal for flares was seen in patients with higher serum urate levels prior to ICI, taking atezolizumab, and those with GI and GU cancers. However, these observations require further investigation to fully understand any potential associations.

Conclusion: This nationwide evaluation of VHA patients with established gout identified gout flares in 48.5% of patients during the six months following ICI infusion.  While flares may certainly occur in patients with gout as a part of the natural history of this disease, the high frequency of flares after ICI therapy warrants additional investigation. Larger studies with control populations not treated with ICIs are needed to further understand the increased flare risk following ICI treatment in gout patients. 

Supporting image 1

Table 1

Supporting image 2

Table 2


Disclosures: A. herron: None; M. Ting Lai: None; N. Schlesinger: arthrosi, 1, horizon, 1, Novartis, 1, olatec, 1, 2, ptotalix, 1, 2, shanton, 1, sobi, 1; S. brian: None; J. Rojas: None; s. Patel: None; M. O’Sullivan: None; g. Cannon: None; T. Braaten: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

herron A, Ting Lai M, Schlesinger N, brian S, Rojas J, Patel s, O’Sullivan M, Cannon g, Braaten T. Gout FlaresFollowingImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-flaresfollowingimmune-checkpoint-inhibitors-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-flaresfollowingimmune-checkpoint-inhibitors-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology