ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1530

Belimumab-Treated Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Without Prior Immunosuppressant Use Have More Favorable Clinical Outcomes Than Those with Prior Use of an Immunosuppressant

Maral DerSarkissian1, Yan Chen1, Brendan Rabideau1, Theo Man1, Karen Worley2, Bernard Rubin3, Karen Costenbader4 and S. Sam Lim5, 1Analysis Group, Los Angeles, CA, 2GSK, Collegeville, PA, 3GSK, Durham, NC, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, corticosteroids, Outcome measures, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Early diagnosis and treatment of SLE improves prognosis and quality of life.1 Belimumab (BEL), a human immunoglobulin G1λ (IgG1λ) mAb that selectively binds to and inhibits soluble B-lymphocyte stimulator, has real-world effectiveness for SLE.2 Patients (pts) with shorter disease duration and lower organ damage have a greater probability of favorable outcomes with BEL treatment; earlier treatment may be beneficial.3 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2023 recommend immunosuppressant (IS) use is not necessary before biologic initiation.1 This study aims to compare clinical outcomes in BEL-treated pts with and without prior IS use.

Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal study (Study 217537) used de-identified claims data from the Komodo Health Database from January 2015–October 2023. Eligible pts had ≥1 claim for BEL January 2017–October 2023 (index date) and ≥24 months of continuous eligibility pre-index (12-month IS washout period followed by 12-month IS identification period). In the absence of clinical and laboratory data to apply ACR classification criteria for disease, claims-based ICD-9/10 diagnoses prior to BEL initiation determined eligibility. Pts were stratified by IS use: no IS use (0IS) vs one IS (1IS) use in the 12 months pre-index. Pts with IS use during the 12-month IS washout period or use of ≥2 IS during the 12 months pre-index were excluded. Baseline period was 12 months prior to first IS treatment date (1IS) or first new non-IS SLE treatment or oral corticosteroid (OCS) escalation date (0IS). Follow-up period ceased with the end of continuous eligibility or data availability. OCS discontinuation/reduction and rate of SLE flares were compared using Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding. Variables with a standardized difference >10% were included in regression models for a robust approach.

Results: There were 2,221 0IS pts and 2,539 1IS pts. Few baseline characteristics had a standardized difference >10% after applying IPTW (Table 1). 0IS and 1IS pts with index OCS use had median (95% confidence interval, CI) time to OCS discontinuation of 9.8 (8.2, 12.2) and 11.7 (10.5, 13.4) months, respectively. 0IS pts were 31% more likely to discontinue OCS (hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.50; p< 0.05; Table 2). Time to OCS dose reduction and dose reduction/discontinuation were not significantly different between 0IS and 1IS pts (Table 2). 0IS pts had 6% lower rate of total SLE flares vs 1IS pts (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.96; p< 0.05; Table 3). This was driven by a 23% reduction in the rate of moderate flares (IRR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.80; p< 0.05; Table 3).

Conclusion: Pts initiating BEL before vs after IS use were more likely to discontinue OCS and have lower rates of SLE flares, showing benefits of earlier BEL use in line with EULAR recommendations.1 This study supports clinician decision-making regarding earlier positioning of BEL within the SLE treatment pathway; pts treated with BEL before IS use had more favorable clinical outcomes.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. IPTW†-weighted baseline demographic and clinical characteristics

Supporting image 2

Table 2. IPTW-weighted risk of OCS discontinuation and reduction for 0IS versus 1IS patients

Supporting image 3

Table 3. IPTW-weighted incidence rate ratio of SLE flare during the 12-month follow-up period for 0IS versus 1IS patients

Disclosures: M. DerSarkissian: Analysis Group, 3, GSK, 5; Y. Chen: Analysis Group, 3, GSK, 5; B. Rabideau: Analysis Group, 3, GSK, 5; T. Man: Analysis Group, 3, GSK, 5; K. Worley: GSK, 3, 11; B. Rubin: GSK, 3, 11; K. Costenbader: Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Bain HealthSciences, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Cabaletta Bio, 2, 5, Exagen, 5, Gilead, 5, Glaxo Smith Kline, 2, 5, Merck, 5; S. Lim: Accordant, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 5, Gilead, 5, GSK, 2, Novartis, 5, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

DerSarkissian M, Chen Y, Rabideau B, Man T, Worley K, Rubin B, Costenbader K, Lim S. Belimumab-Treated Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Without Prior Immunosuppressant Use Have More Favorable Clinical Outcomes Than Those with Prior Use of an Immunosuppressant [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/belimumab-treated-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-without-prior-immunosuppressant-use-have-more-favorable-clinical-outcomes-than-those-with-prior-use-of-an-immunosuppressant/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/belimumab-treated-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-without-prior-immunosuppressant-use-have-more-favorable-clinical-outcomes-than-those-with-prior-use-of-an-immunosuppressant/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology