ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1081

Evaluation of Methods for Ascertainment and Categorization of Race and Ethnicity for Clinical Research: An Umbrella Review

Teresa Semalulu1, Melanie Anderson2, Shahad Al-Matar1, SADEEM ALFRAIH1, Azza Eissa3, Emma Neary4, Fadi Kharouf5, Abimbola Saka3, Zayd Schafer6, Zahi Touma1 and Sindhu Johnson7, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2The Institute for Education Research, Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, 4McGill University, Montreal, QC, 5University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6American University of Antigua, Saint John's, 7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western and Mount Sinai Hospitals; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Education, Epidemiology, Measurement, race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Race and ethnicity are increasingly evaluated in rheumatology research due to their influence on health outcomes, yet there remains heterogeneity in their interpretation and use. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify how race and ethnicity have been conceptualized, to (2) comparatively evaluate  methods used to ascertain race and ethnicity, and (3) methods of race and ethnicity categorization in clinical research.

Methods: An umbrella review was conducted compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Sociological Abstracts from January 2002 to October 2023 using search terms related to: (1) race and ethnicity, (2) conceptualization, (3) genetics, and (4) clinical research. Relevant English language review articles published in peer-reviewed journals were selected for inclusion by two independent reviewers. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for potentially relevant articles, then full text articles for final inclusion. References of selected articles and grey literature were reviewed. Data on the construct of race and ethnicity, methods of ascertainment and categorization were abstracted using a standardized form.

Results: The search generated 9853 articles, with 183 articles selected for full-text review. A total of 11 review articles were selected for inclusion. Race and ethnicity have been conceptualized as biologic entities, with a more recent shift as socially constructed concepts. There is conflated understanding of how these concepts relate and differ from ancestry. We identified 5 methods for the ascertainment of race: self-report, social assignment, name-based ethnic classification, geocoding, and genetic analysis (Table 1). We identified 17 systems of categorization, with racial categories ranging from 3 to 15 (Table 2). Systems of race and ethnicity categorization vary within and across geographic regions, reflecting population context.

Conclusion: The constructs of race and ethnicity are evolving, ranging from a biologic to socio-political construct. There are several methods of ascertainment and categorization of race and ethnicity, with varying risk of misclassification bias. This synthesis of methods can be used to inform the conduct of clinical research in rheumatic diseases.

Supporting image 1

Comparative evaluation of methods of ascertainment of race and ethnicity

Supporting image 2

Examples of methods of categorization


Disclosures: T. Semalulu: None; M. Anderson: None; S. Al-Matar: None; S. ALFRAIH: None; A. Eissa: None; E. Neary: None; F. Kharouf: None; A. Saka: None; Z. Schafer: None; Z. Touma: None; S. Johnson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Semalulu T, Anderson M, Al-Matar S, ALFRAIH S, Eissa A, Neary E, Kharouf F, Saka A, Schafer Z, Touma Z, Johnson S. Evaluation of Methods for Ascertainment and Categorization of Race and Ethnicity for Clinical Research: An Umbrella Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-methods-for-ascertainment-and-categorization-of-race-and-ethnicity-for-clinical-research-an-umbrella-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-methods-for-ascertainment-and-categorization-of-race-and-ethnicity-for-clinical-research-an-umbrella-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology