ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1809

Topline Results Of The Biomarkers Of Lupus Disease (BOLD) Study: Clinical and Mechanistic Perplexities Of Lupus Treatment Trials Can Be Mitigated By Eliminating Background Immune Suppressants

Joan T. Merrill1, Frederick W. Immermann2, Tianhui Zhou3, Margot O'Toole4, Maryann Whitley5, Andrew A. Hill5, Ying Zhang5, David von Schack5, Padmalatha S. Reddy5, Jaime L. Masferrer4, Stan Kamp1, Joel M. Guthridge6, Aikaterini Thanou7, Paul Wu5, Theresa Paradis5, William M. Mounts5, Judith A. James8 and Sudhakar T. Sridharan2, 1Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2BioTherapeutics R&D, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 3BioTherapeutics R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 4independent consultant, Cambridge, MA, 5Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, 6Arthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 7Arthritis and Clinical Immmunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 8Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomarkers, clinical trials, interferons and treatment options, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects: Non-biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The BOLD study was designed to test the discriminatory capacity and safety of a trial design eliminating background immune suppressants (IS) in SLE patients (pts) with active, non-organ threatening disease.

Methods: 103 active pts (SLEDAI >/= 6 and/or >/= 2 BILAG B or 1 A) were evaluated at baseline (BV) for effects of IS on immunologic variables, then 41 pts entered a prospective phase with depomedrol injections to improve disease, withdrawal of background IS, and serial biomarker samples until flare. Designation of improving visits (IV) and flare visits (FV) were weighted by clinical opinion and confirmed by BV vs IV: universal decreases in SLEDAI, BILAG, PGA, CLASI, and joint counts (all p<0.0001), IV vs FV: universal increases (all p<0.0013).

Results: The regimen was well tolerated.  Of 48 adverse events only one was serious (bleeding ulcer) and resolved.  40/41 pts flared within 24 weeks.  All flares improved within 6 weeks with treatment.  Median (95% CI) Days to flare (DTF) was 56 (40-76). This was influenced by baseline disease activity and amount of steroid given. BILAG >/= 17 DTF 40 (29-72) vs BILAG < 17 DTF 71 (43-91) (log rank p= 0.043), depomedrol /= 17 DTF 38 (22-76) vs depomedrol >/= 320mg + BILAG < 17 DTF 91 (40-107). Baseline (withdrawn) IS had no impact on DTF. 47% of pts had elevated type I interferon signature (IFN HI) defined by a novel 11 gene panel we have reported (1).  38% of Caucasians were IFN HI vs 50% Asians, 69% Native Americans and 65% African Americans (Cauc vs others: p=0.012). IFN HI pts were more likely to have antibodies to dsDNA (p=0.001) SSA/Ro (p=0.0007) RNP (p=0.0001) and Sm (p=0.01), had higher circulating BLyS (p=0.00018) and IL23 (p=0.02) but not increased CR3 membrane expression. The table below illustrates potential differences between IFN HI and LOW pts in the impact of different IS on fold expression of non-IFN RNA [e.g. Increase (INCR) or Decrease (DECR), blank cells indicate no differences.        

       

 Mechanistic Impact of Background Treatments Commonly Allowed in Lupus Trials Evaluated By Underlying IFN Signature: Fold Increase or Decrease in RNA Expression 

 

All Pts (n=103) vs healthy controls 

Pts on AZA vs Pts on no IS

  Pts on MMF vs Pts on no IS

 Pts on MTX vs Pts on     no IS

Gene product

IFN HI

IFN LOW

IFN HI

IFN LOW

IFN HI

IFN LOW

  IFN HI

IFN LOW

BLyS/TNFSF13B  (p value)

INCR 2.43 (0.0001)

 

 

 

INCR 1.36(0.018)

 

 

 

IL23A                   (p value)

DECR 1.29 (0.04)

DECR 1.24 (0.09)

INCR 1.57(0.029)

 

 

 

 

 

CR3/ITGAM       (p value)

 

 

DECR 1.27
(0.04)

 

 

DECR  1.69(0.006)

 

 

LGALS3BP        (p value)   

INCR 2.93 (0.0001)

 

 

 

 

 

DECR  2.77(0.0009)

 

IgE Recptr        (p value)

DECR 2.13(0.0001)

 

 

INCR 1.95  (0.053)

INCR 2.28(0.02)

 

INCR   2.20(0.051)

INCR 3.43(0.0008)

 This exploratory, biomarker analysis was not corrected for multiple comparisons. 

 

Conclusion: The BOLD treatment regimen is safe in pts without organ threatening disease and confirms the feasibility of an efficient trial design, ensuring low placebo response rates after brief baseline steroid intervention. This allows consideration of immediate rescue treatment at time of non-response without obfuscating the endpoint, and solves the problem of conventional trials requiring year-long stability of ineffective IS. Less background IS may also decrease infection risk. All outcome measures (BILAG, SLEDAI, PGA, CLASI) performed robustly in this simplified protocol, consistent with clinician-determined improvement and flare. With improved understanding of individual treatment effects on immune targets in key patient subsets, IS might be more strategically selected for studies of sicker pts and withdrawn entirely for stable pts, improving the discriminatory capacity of lupus trials while illuminating the optimal use of medications in clinic.

(1) Hill et al EULAR 2013 FRI0003


Disclosure:

J. T. Merrill,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

F. W. Immermann,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

T. Zhou,

Bristol Myers Squibb,

3,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

M. O’Toole,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

M. Whitley,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

A. A. Hill,

Pfizer Inc,

3,

Pfizer Inc,

1;

Y. Zhang,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

D. von Schack,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

P. S. Reddy,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

J. L. Masferrer,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

S. Kamp,
None;

J. M. Guthridge,
None;

A. Thanou,
None;

P. Wu,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

T. Paradis,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

W. M. Mounts,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

J. A. James,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

S. T. Sridharan,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/topline-results-of-the-biomarkers-of-lupus-disease-bold-study-clinical-and-mechanistic-perplexities-of-lupus-treatment-trials-can-be-mitigated-by-eliminating-background-immune-suppressants/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology