ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2241

Guselkumab Efficacy in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with or Without Hyperuricemia: Post-hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies

Renaud FELTEN1, Laura Widawski2, Lionel Spielman2, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg3, Pierre-Marie Duret2, Emmanouil Rampakakis4, Mohamed Sharaf5, Caren Constantin6, vincenza campana6 and Laurent Messer7, 1Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France, 2Hôpitaux civils de Colmar, Colmar, France, 3Rheumatology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 4JSS Medical Research, Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada, 5Immunology, Janssen MEA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 6Janssen Cilag Medical Affairs, Issy les Moulineaux, France, 7Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire en études culturelles (LinCS), Strasbourg, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, hyperuricemia, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2227–2256) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment: SpA Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients (pts) with psoriasis (PsO) or PsA are at increased risk for developing gout; and hyperuricemia (HU) prevalence is higher in PsO/PsA pts than the general population1,2. A previous analysis showed that the profile of pts with vs without HU was distinct and that the efficacy of secukinumab (SEC) was comparable in hyper- and normo-uricemic pts except for PsO Area Severity Index response (PASI90), which was lower with SEC 150mg in HU pts3. These post hoc analyses sought to contrast PsA pts with vs without HU and evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab (GUS) through 1y in both cohorts.

Methods: Adults in DISCOVER 1&2 (90% bionaive) with active PsA despite standard therapies were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo. HU was defined as baseline (BL) serum urate levels of ≥360 μmol/L. Pts without HU (no HU) but with history of gout or uric-lowering therapies were excluded. Among GUS-randomized pts, the effect of HU vs no HU on changes from BL through W52 in Disease Activity (DA) Index for PsA (DAPSA), PsA DA Score (PASDAS), PASI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form 36-item physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score, and BASDAI (in pts with axial involvement) was assessed with mixed models for repeated measures adjusting for BL outcome levels, GUS regimen, prior TNFi use, and BL conventional synthetic DMARD use. The effect of HU vs no HU on achievement of ACR50, DAPSA low disease activity (LDA; ≤14), PASDAS LDA (≤3.2), PASI90, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (FACIT-F) response (Δ≥4), and enthesitis/dactylitis resolution in pts not in response/with condition at BL (all non-responder imputation for missing data) was assessed with logistic regression adjusting for the same covariates.

Results: Relative to no HU pts (n=689), those with HU (n=425) were older at study BL and PsA diagnosis, and more likely to be male and have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and more severe PsO and dactylitis (in pts with dactylitis) (Table 1). The two cohorts had generally comparable severity of joint disease, enthesitis and axial symptoms. In multivariate analysis (not shown), male sex, hypertension, high BMI, and PsO severity were associated with HU. Clinically meaningful and comparable improvements in all studied continuous outcomes were observed at W24 across HU cohorts and GUS regimens (Figure 1); further improvements were generally seen through W52 regardless of HU. Endpoint achievement was also comparable between HU cohorts and GUS regimens (Figure 2).

Conclusion: In this pooled analysis of mainly bio-naïve pts with active PsA, HU pts were more likely to be male and have high BMI, hypertension, and more severe PsO and dactylitis. The observed differential clinical profile and comorbidities, confirmed in previous studies3, underscore the value of assessing serum urate levels in PsA pts. GUS was associated with clinically meaningful improvements across key PsA domains, with further enhancements generally seen through W52, irrespective of HU presence or GUS regimen.

References
1. Tripolino C. Front Med. 2021;8:737573
2. AlJohani R. J Rheum. 2018;45:213
3. Felten R. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:855

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: R. FELTEN: Janssen, 1, 2; L. Widawski: None; L. Spielman: None; J. Gottenberg: AbbVie, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, Lilly, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5; P. Duret: None; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, 3; M. Sharaf: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; C. Constantin: Janssen, 3, 11; v. campana: Janssen, 3, 11; L. Messer: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

FELTEN R, Widawski L, Spielman L, Gottenberg J, Duret P, Rampakakis E, Sharaf M, Constantin C, campana v, Messer L. Guselkumab Efficacy in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with or Without Hyperuricemia: Post-hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-efficacy-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-or-without-hyperuricemia-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-efficacy-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-or-without-hyperuricemia-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology