ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2508

Clinical and Serological Discordance In The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Cohort

Murray B. Urowitz1, Dafna D. Gladman1, Nicole Anderson1 and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics SLICC2, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-dsDNA, Antibodies, Disease Activity, outcome measures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Clinical Aspects III: Biomarkers, Quality of Life and Disease Indicators, Late Complications

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Anti-DNA antibodies and serum complement levels are considered important biomarkers for disease activity in SLE.  Despite this many SLE patients present serologically active (positive antibody and or low complement) but clinically quiescent (SACQ). We aim to determine the frequency of SACQ in a multicentre, multinational cohort.

Methods: An inception cohort of SLE patients from 31 centres in 12 countries has been assembled according to a standardized protocol between 2000 and 2013 to study the risk factors for atherosclerosis. Patients enter the cohort within 15 months of SLE diagnosis (≥4 ACR criteria). Clinical and laboratory features of SLE and comorbidities are gathered in a standardized protocol at yearly intervals. SACQ was defined as at least two consecutive yearly visits with SLEDAI of 2 or 4 from serologic activity only (increased anti-double-stranded DNA and/or hypocomplementemia), during which patients could be taking antimalarials, but not steroids or immunosuppressives. We examined patients 1 year after the SACQ period and beyond. Flare was defined as any increase in clinical activity. Since patients were mandated to only be on antimalarials it is unlikely they had moderate to severe flares between yearly assessment visits. Serologically quiescent and clinically quiescent (SQCQ) was defined as SLEDAI-2K score of 0.

Results: 91 of 1837 (5%) patients met the criteria for SACQ.  Of the 91 patients studied, 86.8% were female and the race/ethnicity distribution was 65.9% Caucasian, 9.9% Black, 13.2% Asian, 7.7% Hispanic and 3.3% other. The age at SLE diagnosis was 34.6 ± 11.9 years.  Disease duration at last follow–up was 7.1± 3.0 years. Fifty-five patients did not retain SACQ status after the first year and 36 patients experienced a prolonged SACQ. Of the 55 patients that did not retain SACQ status, 25 (45.45%) flared, 14 (25.45%) became SQCQ and 16 (29.09%) were censored at the last visit.  Of the 36 patients that went onto prolonged SACQ: 9 (25.00%) patients flared after 3 years of SACQ, 4 (11.11%) patients became SQCQ and 23 (63.89%) patients were censored at their last visit.

Conclusion:  Sixty percent of the SACQ patients no longer retained SACQ status in the first year, while 40% experienced a prolonged SACQ period and 25% of those flared later. Therefore treatment decisions in these patients must be based on close clinical observation.


Disclosure:

M. B. Urowitz,
None;

D. D. Gladman,
None;

N. Anderson,
None;

S. L. E. I. C. C. SLICC,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-and-serological-discordance-in-the-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-international-collaborating-clinics-slicc-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology