ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L08

Long Term Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Chronic Gout: The Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (on Behalf of the FAST Investigators)

Thomas MacDonald1, Isla Mackenzie1, George Nuki2 and Ian Ford3, 1University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 3University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Date of first publication: October 23, 2020

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Drug toxicity, gout, Late-Breaking 2020, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Late-Breaking Abstracts (L06–L11)

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:30AM-1:00PM

Background/Purpose: Febuxostat and allopurinol are uric acid lowering agents. Following concerns about the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended a post-authorization study comparing the cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat versus allopurinol.

Methods: We did a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial of febuxostat versus allopurinol in patients with chronic symptomatic hyperuricaemia (gout) in the UK, Denmark, and Sweden. Eligible patients were 60 years or older, were currently treated with allopurinol, and had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. After increasing allopurinol dose if necessary to achieve serum uric acid (SUA) levels < 0·357 mmol/L (< 6 mg/dL), patients were randomly assigned to continue allopurinol (at optimised dose) or start febuxostat at a dose of 80mg daily, increasing to 120mg, if necessary, to achieve serum uric acid level < 0·357 mmol/L. A short washout period (7-21 days) was included before randomized therapy was started. The primary outcome was the composite of hospitalisation for non-fatal myocardial infarction/biomarker positive acute coronary syndrome, non-fatal stroke or cardiovascular death. The hazard ratio (febuxostat versus allopurinol) in a Cox proportional hazards model was assessed for non-inferiority (limit of 1·3) in an on-treatment (OT) analysis and then by intention to treat (ITT). This study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2011-001883-23) and ISRCTN (ISRCTN72443728).

Results: 6128 patients (mean age 71, 85·3% male, 33·4% prior established CV disease) were randomised to receive allopurinol (n=3065) or febuxostat (n=3063) and were followed up for a median of 4 years during which 5·5% and 6·2% respectively withdrew from all follow up. In both the on-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses, febuxostat was non-inferior to allopurinol for incidence of the primary endpoint (OT analysis: febuxostat 172 patients [1·72 events per 100 patient years]; allopurinol 241 patients [2·05 events per 100 patient years]; hazard ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·70-1·03], p< 0·001; ITT analysis: febuxostat 256 patients [2·05 events per 100 patient years], allopurinol 285 patients [2·29 events per 100 patient years]; hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·75-1·06], p< 0·001). 222 (7·2%) patients died in the febuxostat group compared to 263 deaths (8·6%) in the allopurinol group.

Conclusion: Febuxostat was non-inferior to allopurinol therapy for the primary cardiovascular outcome. Long-term use of febuxostat was not associated with an increased risk of death compared with allopurinol.

Funding: Menarini provided funding. The University of Dundee was the sponsor and Menarini had no involvement in the running of the study.


Disclosure: T. MacDonald, Pfizer, 2, GSK, 2, Amgen, 2, Menarini, 2, 8, Takeda, 8, Astellus, 8, Servier, 8, Shire, 8, AstraZeneca, 8; I. Mackenzie, Sanofi, 2, Menarini, 2, AstraZeneca, 5; G. Nuki, Research funding from Menarini to the University of Edinburgh for conducting this study, 2; I. Ford, Servier, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Adaptimmune, 2, 5, Pharmacosmos, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

MacDonald T, Mackenzie I, Nuki G, Ford I. Long Term Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Chronic Gout: The Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (on Behalf of the FAST Investigators) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-cardiovascular-safety-of-febuxostat-and-allopurinol-in-patients-with-chronic-gout-the-febuxostat-versus-allopurinol-streamlined-trial-on-behalf-of-the-fast-investigators/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-cardiovascular-safety-of-febuxostat-and-allopurinol-in-patients-with-chronic-gout-the-febuxostat-versus-allopurinol-streamlined-trial-on-behalf-of-the-fast-investigators/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology