ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1115

The Relation of MRI-Based Cartilage Lesions to Knee Replacement and Knee Pain Severity in Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

Tuhina Neogi1, David Felson1, Kathy Bacon2, James Torner3, Cora Lewis4, Michael Nevitt5 and S. Reza Jafarzadeh1, 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, 3University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 4University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: cartilage, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Osteoarthritis, Prosthetic Joint

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Recently, the FDA has indicated that data supporting imaging biomarkers of relevance to clinically important outcomes, such as knee replacement (KR) may be considered as an endpoint for OA RCTs, including MRI-based cartilage evaluations. We therefore evaluated the relation of MRI-based cartilage lesions to knee replacement and knee pain severity, short-term change in cartilage lesions, which is of relevance for drug development programs so that insights can be gained regarding likelihood of clinically important outcomes after a shorter term RCT based on a surrogate.

Methods:

We used data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study, a NIH-funded longitudinal cohort of persons with or at risk of knee OA. All participants had knee MRIs and WOMAC pain obtained at baseline, 30-, 60-, and 84-months. Cartilage lesions were scored from 1.0 T knee MRIs using WORMS. To replicate eligibility for trials, we excluded knees with KL=4 or malalignment >5 degrees. We evaluated the relation of baseline and 2.5-year changes in cartilage lesions to subsequent risk of KR and WOMAC knee pain severity over 7 years. Baseline cartilage lesions were analyzed as: 1) maximal score across all subregions (0-6); 2) sum of scores across all subregions (0-84). Change over 2.5 years were analyzed as: 1) change in sum of scores; 2) proportion of subregions with worsening lesions. We evaluated the sample as a whole, as well as limited to those with JSN=2 (~ JSW=1.5-3.5mm), a group demonstrating more responsiveness in recent RCTs, and to those with WOMAC pain 8-18 (out of 20), a typical pain range for entry into RCTs. For the relation of cartilage lesions to KR, we used a mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model with a random-intercept for subjects. For WOMAC pain, we used linear mixed-effects model with a random-intercept for subjects and a nested random-intercept for knees within subjects. For analyses of change in cartilage score from baseline to 2.5 years later, we evaluated outcomes occurring at time-points after 2.5 years.

Results: Overall, 1755 subjects (2554 knees) met inclusion criteria (mean age 62, 64% female, 86.5% White, mean WOMAC pain 2.7). 113 knees underwent KR overall (4.4%); of knees that were JSN=2 at baseline, 19.8% (41/258) underwent KR and of knees with WOMAC 8-18 at baseline, 10.2% (25/244) underwent KR.  Overall, both severity and extent of baseline cartilage lesions as well as change in cartilage lesions over 2.5 years were significantly associated with risk of KR (Table). In contrast, while cartilage lesions were significantly associated with WOMAC pain severity, the relationship was weak (Table).

Conclusion: These findings support the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions to the clinically important endpoint of KR. Relatively short-term changes in cartilage lesions over 2.5 years may be potentially useful as a prognostic marker for later clinical endpoints such as KR. However, the magnitude may not be sufficient for validation as an imaging biomarker. In contrast, cartilage lesions were not strongly associated with WOMAC pain, potentially partly reflecting the uncertainty in utility of WOMAC pain to detect long-term change in pain over several years. 

Relation of Baseline & 2.5-year Change in Cartilage Morphology to Risk of Knee Replacement and to Knee Pain Severity


Disclosure: T. Neogi, Lilly, 1, EMD Merck Serono, 1, Novartis, 1, Regeneron, 1, Pfizer/Lilly, 1; D. Felson, None; K. Bacon, None; J. Torner, None; C. Lewis, None; M. Nevitt, None; S. Jafarzadeh, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Neogi T, Felson D, Bacon K, Torner J, Lewis C, Nevitt M, Jafarzadeh S. The Relation of MRI-Based Cartilage Lesions to Knee Replacement and Knee Pain Severity in Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relation-of-mri-based-cartilage-lesions-to-knee-replacement-and-knee-pain-severity-in-osteoarthritis-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relation-of-mri-based-cartilage-lesions-to-knee-replacement-and-knee-pain-severity-in-osteoarthritis-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology