ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0452

Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Retrospective Study of 622 Patients

Tiphaine Lenfant1, Elizabeth Kirchner2, Rula Hajj-ali3, Leonard Calabrese3 and Cassandra Calabrese3, 1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Rocky River, OH, 2Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, 3Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Infection, prevention, rheumatoid arthritis, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Immunological Complications of Therapy (0449–0453)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:50PM

Background/Purpose: The recombinant herpes zoster vaccine (RZV) was FDA-approved in 2017 but patients with rheumatic diseases were excluded from initial pivotal trials because of theoretical risk of flares given the vaccine’s potent immunogenicity. Its use in patients with RA, SLE and vasculitis raises particular concern.

Methods: Patients followed in the Cleveland Clinic Rheumatology Department who received RZV between February 2018 and March 2020 were identified and retrospectively included in this study. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years, at least one RZV dose during the study period, available data on the clinical status before and after the vaccine. Data were collected from the electronic medical record. An immune mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) flare was defined as a) a documentation of flare in the rheumatology office notes, telephone encounter or patient portal communication or b) new prednisone prescription, occurring in the 12 week period following each dose. Adverse events (AE) attributed to RZV and occurrence of herpes zoster (HZ) were also assessed. The statistical analysis was performed with R studio v.1.2.5042. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests and multivariable analysis were performed using logistic regression and Cox model (tests were two-sided, significance level was 0.05).

Results: In the study period, 622 patients met the inclusion criteria; the majority were female (67%), and median age was 67 years. Of the group, 15% reported a history of HZ and 43% had previously received live attenuated zoster vaccine. 147 patients (24%) received 1 dose of RZV, while 475 (76%) received both dsoses with a median interval of 2.9 months. The AE rate was 8.5% with mostly mild events (71%). After a median 35.8 weeks of follow-up, the HZ incidence was 0.6%.

Of 358 IMID patients the most common were RA (n=88, 25%), vasculitis (n=50, 14%), and PMR (n=29, 8%). Baseline treatment in this group included glucocorticoids (GC) (35%, median dose 5 mg/day), conventional and biologic DMARDs (Fig 1). Fifty-seven (16%) experienced a flare: 34 (60%) after the first dose, 16 (28%) after the second, and 7 (12%) flared after both. RA patients had the highest flare rate (n=21, 24%). Flares occurred in temporal relation to a treatment change in 18 cases (31%). Flares were most often treated with GC (44%, median dose 20 mg/day) and 14 (25%) required a change in immunosuppressive therapy. Among IMID patients, univariate analysis revealed more flares in patients on GC and Jak-inhibitors (p=0.002 and 0.025 respectively), and in RA patients (p=0.019) (Table 1). A multivariate analysis showed that only GC use at time of vaccine remained significantly associated with flares (OR = 2.31 [1.29-4.15], p=0.005). A time-to-flare survival analysis was conducted with a multivariate Cox-model: glucocorticoids remained the only significant predictor of the first IMID flare (HR = 2.34 [1.3-4.3], p=0.006) (Fig 2).

Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of rheumatic disease patients, we found the incidence of AEs and HZ after RZV to be consistent with the existing literature. GC at time of RZV was associated with a significantly higher rate of flares, suggesting that delaying RZV administration in patients with active disease may be prudent

Legend: IMID: Immune Mediated Inflammatory Disease; RZV: Recombinant Zoster Vaccine; OR: Odd-ratio; IC: Confident Interval

Legend. IMID: Immune Mediated Inflammatory Disease; RZV: Recombinant Zoster Vaccine; RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; GC: Glucocorticoids; MTX: Methotrexate; HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine; SSA: Sulfasalazine; Jak-i: Jak-inhibitors; TNF-i: TNF inhibitors; Other biologic: abatacept, apremilast, belimumab, mepolizumab, rituximab, secukinumab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab; Other IS: Other Immunosuppressant, azathioprine, leflunomide, ciclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus; IVIG: Intravenous Immunoglobulin.

Legend: This figure shows a survival analysis of the time-to-flare with estimated risk of being on glucocorticoids at the time of first RZV dose (multivariate Cox-model). IMID: Immune Mediated Inflammatory Disease; RZV: Recombinant Zoster Vaccine; GC: Glucocorticoids; HR: Hazard Ratio


Disclosure: T. Lenfant, None; E. Kirchner, None; R. Hajj-ali, ABBVIE, 1, Rockpoint, 1; L. Calabrese, AbbVie, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, Genentech, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, Horizon, 1, Crescendo, 1, Gilead, 1; C. Calabrese, Abbvie, 1, Regeneron, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lenfant T, Kirchner E, Hajj-ali R, Calabrese L, Calabrese C. Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Retrospective Study of 622 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/recombinant-zoster-vaccine-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-a-retrospective-study-of-622-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/recombinant-zoster-vaccine-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-a-retrospective-study-of-622-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology