ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0339

Is Sex-adjusted Treatment in Early-PsA Justified?

Evangelia Passia1, Jolanda Luime1, Marc Kok2, Ilja Tchetverikov3, Marijn Vis4, Fouchia Fodili5, Yvonne Ruiterman6 and Lindy-Anne Korswagen7, 1Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 2Maasstadziekenhuis, Rotterdam, 3Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, 4Erasmus UMC, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 5RZWN, Roosendaal, 6HAGA ziekenhuis, Den Haag, 7Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gender, Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: According to existing knowledge, the  prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is equal in men and women, however, women experience a higher burden of disease (pain, disability and fatigue). Recently we showed that women with newly diagnosed PsA present higher disease activity, pain and functional impairment compared to men at baseline but also at one year of follow up. Several reasons could be  incriminated  for the observed differences and their persistence over time. One of them could be a different therapeutic approach, maybe less aggressive, in women compared to men.

To compare applied treatment  in female and male patients with early PsA.

Methods: Data were used from the Dutch south west Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort (DEPAR) which includes newly diagnosed PsA patients. Data on disease activity, medication use and patient reported outcomes is gathered at baseline and from then, during the first year, every 3 months. Exposure time (days), cumulative and mean dose per dosing interval during the first year were calculated for each conventional DMARD (csDMARD). Exposure time for biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), as a group was also calculated. T-tests and Kruskal Wallis tests were used for the comparison across sexes. Stata 16 was used for statistical analysis.

Results: In February 2019, 615 patients were available for analysis, 304 men and 311 women (51%), average age of 50 (SD 13.6) years.  Oligoarthritis was the most frequent phenotype (39%), more frequently present in men (44%) than in women (33%).  Polyarthritis (23%) was more prevalent in women. 523 patients had 12 months of follow-up, while the remaining 92  participated a mean 223 days in the study. Over the first year, 75% of the patients received one or more DMARDs for which the majority (82%) started within the first month after diagnosis. Not using DMARDs was equally present in both sexes. Monoarthritis was the phenotype less frequently  treated by DMARDs (50%).

Results are shown in table 1. Methotrexate was the most frequently used drug during the first year. Its frequency (70%) and dosing (median 20 mg/week) were similar for men and women.. Women received methotrexate for a shorter period (median 270 vs 290 days) and subsequently had a lower cumulative dose compared to men. Sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids were more frequently prescribed in women compared to men.  Retention time of sulfasalazine was substantial shorter in women. Number of days on bDMARDs was lower for women (n=39, median 160 days), but not significantly different from men(n=42, median 212 days), mainly caused by a later start of bDMARDs in women.

Conclusion: 75% of early Psoriatic Arthritis patients in DEPAR were treated by DMARDs in the first year after diagnosis. Initial treatment strategies were similar in both sexes.  However, over time women received methotrexate for a shorter period, were more often switched to other csDMARDs and started later with bDMARDs. Retention time for the other csDMARDs was shorter in women. These observations raise the question whether optimal therapeutic strategies are in place for women with early PsA.

Table 1 DMARD medication frequency, median days of exposure, cumulative dose and dose per dosing interval in the first year after PsA diagnosis stratified by sex. *non-parametric comparison between men and women. t parametric t-test for comparison between men and women


Disclosure: E. Passia, None; J. Luime, None; M. Kok, None; I. Tchetverikov, None; M. Vis, Novartis, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, AbbVie, 1, Celgene Corporation, 1, Eli Lilly, 1; F. Fodili, None; Y. Ruiterman, None; L. Korswagen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Passia E, Luime J, Kok M, Tchetverikov I, Vis M, Fodili F, Ruiterman Y, Korswagen L. Is Sex-adjusted Treatment in Early-PsA Justified? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-sex-adjusted-treatment-in-early-psa-justified/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-sex-adjusted-treatment-in-early-psa-justified/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology