ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1894

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic and Non-biologic DMARDs, a Population-based Study

Lingyi Li1, Na Lu 1, Diane Lacaille 2, Hui Xie 3, John Esdaile 4 and J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta 5, 1Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Richmond, BC, Canada, 5Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, DMARDs, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), venous thromboembolism

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M117: RA – Treatments III: Cardiovascular Disease & Readmissions (1890–1895)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE, which includes pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) compared with the general population. However, population-based data on the risk of VTE among patients with newly diagnosed RA and new users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are limited. The objectives of our study were: 1) to estimate the incidence rate of VTE, PE, DVT among new users of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) in RA patients. 2) To compare risk of VTE, PE and DVT between new users of bDMARDs and cDMARDs.

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative data that included all visits to physician and hospital from Jan 1990 until Mar 2015 and all dispensed medication from Sep 1995 to Mar 2015. Our sample included all patients with newly diagnosed RA using a previously validated case definition from physician billing data; and who were new users of a DMARD (no prior use in the 365 days before the first DMARD). Date of first DMARD use was considered the index date. For discontinuation, the exposure risk window for each DMARD extended until 30 days after the expiration of the last fill. Our outcomes of interest were first ever VTE, PE, and DVT based on ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes plus dispensation of an oral anti-coagulant. Follow-up began on the index date and continued until the earliest occurrence of: 1) DAMRD discontinuation; 2) leaving the province; 3) death; 4) the end of the study period; 5) the outcome of interest; or 6) switching to another DMARD. We calculated incidence rates per 100 person-years for each outcome (Table 1). Incidence rates of VTE were also stratified by age and sex. Furthermore, we conducted Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of incident VTE, PE, and DVT during periods of bDMARDs use relative to periods of cDMARDs use after adjusting for baseline covariates.

Results: 14,809 patients were new users of cDMARDs (74% female, mean age of 58 yrs) and 4,723 were new users of bDMARDs (74% female, mean age of 56 yrs). Among new users of cDMARDs and bDMARDs, 40 and 24 patients developed VTE, the incidence rate was 0.36 and 0.47 per 100 person-years (Table 1), respectively. Across cDMARDs and bDMARDs, risk of VTE increased with age and was also higher in men than women (Table 2). Comparing bDMARDs with cDMARDs, the fully adjusted HRs were 1.20 (95% CI, 0.67-2.15), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.49-2.91), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.53-2.04) (Table 3), for VTE, PE, DVT, respectively.

Conclusion: The incidence rate of VTE varies by age and sex among RA patients treated with different DMARDs. The point estimate suggests a potentially increased risk of VTE in bDMARDs compared to cDAMRDs, but the results were not statistically significant. Further studies with larger sample size and adjusting for confounding by indication are needed.


DMARDsVTEtable1

Table 1: Incidence rates of VTE by DMARDs use


DMARDsVTEtable2

Table 2: Incidence rates of VTE by DMARDs use by age and sex groups


DMARDsVTEtable3

Table 3: Relative risk of incident VTE, PE and DVT according to DMARDs use


Disclosure: L. Li, None; N. Lu, None; D. Lacaille, None; H. Xie, None; J. Esdaile, None; J. Avina-Zubieta, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li L, Lu N, Lacaille D, Xie H, Esdaile J, Avina-Zubieta J. Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic and Non-biologic DMARDs, a Population-based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology