ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1254

Knee Pain and Patient Preference for Knee Replacement: Healthcare Access Matters

Manjinder Kaur1, Erin Ashbeck2, Di Ran2, C. Kent Kwoh3 and Ernest Vina4, 1Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 2University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 3Rheumatology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, 4Rheumatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Knee, Osteoarthritis, pain and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a cost-effective intervention for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Objectives were to estimate the effect of knee pain severity on willingness to undergo TKR and the impact of healthcare access.

Methods:

The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is an observational study of participants with or at risk for knee OA.  Knee pain severity in the past 30 days was assessed using a numerical rating scale (0-10).  Willingness to undergo TKR was ascertained at the 72 month visit. Participants with no history of TKR were included in cross-sectional analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression models. Stratified analyses were conducted to evaluate whether healthcare access modified the association between knee pain severity and willingness to undergo TKR, as well as a likelihood ratio test for interaction between knee pain and components of healthcare access.

Results:

The 3530 participants were predominately White (81.2%) and African American (16.7%), with mean age 66.6 years (sd 9.0), and 58.6% female. More than 90% of participants had health insurance.

Participants with severe knee pain, compared to participants without knee pain, expressed less willingness to undergo TKR (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.90) with adjustment for age and sex.  This association attenuated after further adjustment for comorbidity, and depression (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61-1.03) and when further adjusted for health insurance, prescription coverage, healthcare provider, education, income, employment, race, and marital status (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24).  

Among participants without health insurance coverage, severe knee pain was associated with significantly decreased odds of willingness to undergo TKR after adjustment for demographic, clinical, healthcare access, and socioeconomic factors (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.56) (Figure 1).  Similarly, among participants without prescription coverage, those with severe knee pain were significantly less willing to undergo TKR (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.41). No association between knee pain and willingness was observed among those with health insurance (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73-1.38) and with prescription drug coverage (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79-1.53), suggesting that health insurance and prescription drug coverage modify the association between knee pain severity and willingness to undergo TKR (interaction p=0.015 and p=0.003, respectively). 

Conclusion:

Among participants with health insurance and with prescription drug coverage, no evidence of an effect of knee pain severity on willingness to undergo TKR was found.  Among participants without health insurance and/or without prescription drug coverage, those reporting severe knee pain were less willing to undergo TKR.  This finding reinforces the influence of health insurance on preferences and receipt of appropriate medical care. 


Disclosure: M. Kaur, None; E. Ashbeck, None; D. Ran, None; C. K. Kwoh, None; E. Vina, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kaur M, Ashbeck E, Ran D, Kwoh CK, Vina E. Knee Pain and Patient Preference for Knee Replacement: Healthcare Access Matters [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/knee-pain-and-patient-preference-for-knee-replacement-healthcare-access-matters/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/knee-pain-and-patient-preference-for-knee-replacement-healthcare-access-matters/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology