ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2892

Statin Treatment in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Grunde Wibetoe1, Eirik Ikdahl1, Tore K. Kvien2, Silvia Rollefstad1 and Anne Grete Semb3, 1Preventive Cardio-Rheuma Clinic, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Preventive Cardio-Rheuma clinic, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Cardiovascular disease, Inflammation, lipids and statins

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the general population, CVD risk reduction can be achieved by lipid lowering therapy (LLT). We aimed to evaluate the effect of statins in AS patients and factors associated with the changes (Δ) in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and total cholesterol (TC).

Methods: In this longitudinal, observational study, 108 patients with AS underwent CVD risk evaluation. Of these, 48 patients had an indication for LLT and received statin treatment which was adjusted until lipid targets were achieved. Variables obtaining a p-value of < 0.25 in a univariate analyses were entered in forward, stepwise, linear regression models with ΔLDL-c and ΔTC as the dependent variables and were adjusted for age and gender, as well as baseline LDL-c levels (for ΔLDL-c) and intensity of LLT (for ΔTC).

Results: At first visit, median (IQR) age was 61.5 (56.0, 66.8) years, 72.9 % were male, median disease duration was 27 (17.8, 32.8) years, 12.5 % smoked daily, 70.8 % had hypertension (HT), mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 26.0 (3.50) kg/m2, mean LDL-c and TC, were 3.82±1.02 and 6.04±1.16mmol/L and 70.8 % had carotid plaque(s). Twenty patients were treated with low or moderate intensity LLT (simvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg, rosuvastatin <40 mg or atorvastatin <40 mg), while the remaining 28 received intensive LLT (rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin >40 mg). LDL-c goals (50% reduction in LDL-c and /or LDL-c <2.5 /<1.8 mmol/L, for primary (n=10) or secondary prevention (n=38), respectively) were achieved in 85.4% of patients (90.0% and 84.2% for primary and secondary prevention, respectively). Reductions in LDL-c and TC were 1.60+0.41 mmol/L and 2.42+1.15 mmol/L (p<0.001 for both). Predictive variables explaining 86.5% (R2) of the ΔLDL-c included erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), established CVD and HT. Only ESR (p=0.03) and baseline LDL-c (p<0.001) contributed significantly to the final model. ESR was inversely related to ΔLDL-c. In addition, higher baseline LDL-c levels were associated with larger LDL-c reduction. The final model for ΔTC, accounting for 33.0% (R2) of the variation, included ESR, waist circumference, BMI, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and use of biologic and synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Intensive LLT and high waist circumference were predictive of greater TC reductions (p=0.002 and 0.04, respectively).

Conclusion: Lipid lowering with statins was highly effective in AS patients. Inflammation measured by ESR was inversely related to change in LDL-c, possibly due to the suppressive effect on lipid levels. Further studies are needed to elucidate if the anti-inflammatory effect of rheumatic medication influence the lipid lowering effect of statins in patients with AS.

 

ΔLDL-c, R2=0.865

ΔTC, R2=0.330

 

B (95% CI)

 p-value

 

B (95% CI)

 p-value

Age

0.004

(-0.01, 0.02)

0.56

Age

0.02

(-0.02, 0.05)

0.39

Sex

(gender)

-0.05

(-0.31, 0.21)

0.70

Sex

(gender)

-0.03

(-0.88, 0.83)

0.95

LDL-c at baseline

-0.78

(-0.89, -0.66)

<0.01

LLT

(statin dose)

-1.09

(-1.74, -0.43)

>0.01

ESR

0.01

(0.00, 0.02)

0.03

ESR

0.01

(-0.02, 0.03)

0.61

CVD

0.20

(-0.12, 0.52)

0.21

Waist circumference

-0.06

(-0.12, -0.00)

0.04

Hypertension

-0.16

(-0.42, 0.11)

0.25

BMI

0.14

(-0.06, 0.33)

0.16

 

 

 

NSAIDs

-0.33

(-1.08, 0.42)

0.37

 

 

 

Biologic DMARDs

-0.34

(-1.06, 0.39)

0.35

 

 

 

Synthetic DMARDs

0.18

(-0.87, 1.23)

0.73


Disclosure: G. Wibetoe, None; E. Ikdahl, None; T. K. Kvien, None; S. Rollefstad, None; A. G. Semb, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wibetoe G, Ikdahl E, Kvien TK, Rollefstad S, Semb AG. Statin Treatment in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/statin-treatment-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/statin-treatment-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology