ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2250

Linguistic Differences in Gout-Related Online Content: A Comparison of Professional Health Literature for Consumers Vs Patients’ Online Discussions of Gout

W. Benjamin Nowell1, Kayla Jordan2, Kelly Gavigan1, Louis Tharp1, Jeffrey R. Curtis3 and James Pennebaker4, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 2University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 3Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Education, gout, patient, prevention, social media and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Non-adherence to gout medication is high. This may be due in part to patients’ belief that gout is primarily caused by overindulgence in certain foods and beverages and that it can therefore be alleviated by diet change alone. We sought to identify whether an incongruence existed between professional web-based content created for gout patients and patient’s online discussions.

Methods: Using word frequency analysis and NLP, we examined linguistic differences in a convenience sample of professional webpages and online patient discussions for gout, comparing content from three types of media: 1) consumer literature for patients posted on websites by health organizations (e.g. Gout and Uric Acid Education Society, WebMD, Mayo Clinic) and pharmaceutical companies (n=205 webpages with average of 330 words/page); 2) patient blogs (e.g. gout blogs on patient.com) (n=337 blogs average 641 words/post); and 3) social media (e.g. gout subreddit, a forum on the website Reddit where people can post thoughts or questions for comment) (n=687 original posts average 157 words/post and n=5274 comments average 70 words/comment), excluding posts or comments <20 words. Each unique page on a website relevant to gout was collected and saved into separate text files. After processing and cleaning, consumer sites, blogs, original and reply posts on Reddit were analyzed separately. Differences in psychological processes were identified using LIWC2015 (Pennebaker, Boyd, Jordan, & Blackburn, 2015), a text analysis program measuring a number of psychological dimensions.

Results: LIWC analysis yielded two main findings: 1) consumer sites had greater health focus, shown by use of words like doctor, pain, disease (d=1.34), while blogs/social media, had slightly greater focus on ingestion (i.e. food/drinks) indicated by words such as eat, sweet, feed (d=0.18); and 2) professional and health sites used more risk-oriented language (d=0.57) concerned with prevention and losses (e.g. words like lose, lack, worse), while blogs/social media were somewhat more reward-oriented (d=0.43) focused on potential benefits and gains of treatment and prevention (e.g. words like optimistic, success, and good). All differences between the two groups were significant (p<0.01) and showed comparable patterns across all three types of media. One commonality between sites is frequent discussion of symptoms (e.g. attacks and flares). Word clouds (Figure 1) showed the 30 most common words in each type of site based on basic frequency analysis methods.

Conclusion: People living with gout focus more on food and diet, whereas medical professionals emphasize medical causes and preventions/treatments. More research is needed to determine the most effective ways to encourage patients to seek treatment beyond diet and lifestyle changes.

 


Disclosure: W. B. Nowell, None; K. Jordan, None; K. Gavigan, None; L. Tharp, None; J. R. Curtis, Crescendo Biosciences, 2,Crescendo Biosciences, 5; J. Pennebaker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nowell WB, Jordan K, Gavigan K, Tharp L, Curtis JR, Pennebaker J. Linguistic Differences in Gout-Related Online Content: A Comparison of Professional Health Literature for Consumers Vs Patients’ Online Discussions of Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/linguistic-differences-in-gout-related-online-content-a-comparison-of-professional-health-literature-for-consumers-vs-patients-online-discussions-of-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/linguistic-differences-in-gout-related-online-content-a-comparison-of-professional-health-literature-for-consumers-vs-patients-online-discussions-of-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology