Abstracts tagged "rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment"

Abstract Number: 2653 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Results of a Comprehensive Review of Pulmonary Function and Safety Data in a Phase IIb Clinical Program Testing Anti-GM-CSF Receptor Antagonist Mavrilimumab for Treatment of RA
GR Burmester¹, MA Michaels², D Close³, A Godwood³, K Middleton³, P Miranda⁴, J Vencovský⁵, JM Kremer⁶, IB McInnes⁷, M Albulescu^³ and Michael Weinblatt⁸, ¹Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, ²MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD, ³MedImmune, Cambridge, United Kingdom, ⁴Centro De Estudios Reumatológicos, Santiago, Chile, ⁵Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, ⁶The Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, ⁷University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, ⁸Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
Background/Purpose: RA is associated with significant pulmonary comorbidity and declines in lung function over time; but longitudinal assessment of pulmonary abnormalities in the context of…
Abstract Number: 610 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Efficacy of Biologics in Treating Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Assessment of Long-Term Radiographic Progression from Published Clinical Trials
Erin Murray¹, Yekaterina Butylkova¹, Alexandra Ellis¹, Martha Skup², Jasmina Kalabic³ and Vishvas Garg⁴, ¹Doctor Evidence, Santa Monica, CA, ²AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, ³AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany, ⁴AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL
Background/Purpose: Previously, several studies have meta-analyzed clinical, functional or structural efficacy of biologics in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, the comparative efficacy of biologics…
Abstract Number: 3094 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Factors Associated with Initial or Subsequent Choice of Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Yinzhu Jin¹, Rishi J. Desai¹, Jun Liu¹, Nam-Kyong Choi¹ and Seoyoung Kim^2,3, ¹Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, ²Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmocoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, ³Brigham and Women’s Hospita and, Harvard Medical School,, Boston, MA
Background/Purpose: Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is considered the standard of care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Over the past two decades, major advances have…
Abstract Number: 637 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Biologic Initiation Patterns Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Moderate or High Disease Activity While Using Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs
Natalie Boytsov¹, George W. Reed², Leslie R Harrold^2,3, Xiang Zhang¹, Carol L Gaich¹, Cynthia J Larmore¹, Ying Shan², S Rebello⁴ and Andre B. Araujo¹, ¹Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, ²Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, ³UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, ⁴Epidemiology, Corrona, Southborough, MA
Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe biologic initiation patterns over a 1-year follow-up period in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate…
Abstract Number: 3212 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Treat-to-Target in RA: Does Early Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission Lead to Better 5-Year Functional Outcomes Than SDAI Low Disease Activity?
Vibeke Norvang, Elisabeth Lie, Inge C Olsen, Eirik K Kristianslund, Tore K Kvien and Till Uhlig, Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Background/Purpose: The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably during the last couple of decades, with current recommended practice being a treat-to-target approach, involving…
Abstract Number: 1540 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
“I Am Always in Pain Somewhere”: Continuing Unmet Need in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Peter C. Taylor¹, Rieke Alten², Juan Jesus Gomez-Reino³, Roberto Caporali⁴, Philippe Bertin⁵, Laura Grant⁶, Elaine Brohan⁶, Jane Wells⁶, Radu Vasilescu⁷ and Miriam Tarallo⁸, ¹Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, ²Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, ³Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, ⁴Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy, ⁵Rheumatology, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France, ⁶Adelphi Values, Bollington, United Kingdom, ⁷Medical Affairs, Pfizer, Brussels, Belgium, ⁸GHV, Pfizer, Rome, Italy
Background/Purpose: Despite advances in the RA treatment, substantial humanistic and economic burdens remain. This study of patients with RA, with moderate to severe disease activity…
Abstract Number: 1616 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Mavrilimumab, a Fully Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor-α Monoclonal Antibody: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy for up to 158 Weeks of Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
GR Burmester¹, IB McInnes², JM Kremer³, P Miranda⁴, J Vencovský⁵, A Godwood⁶, M Albulescu⁶, D Close^⁶ and Michael Weinblatt⁷, ¹Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, ²University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, ³The Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, ⁴Centro De Estudios Reumatológicos, Santiago, Chile, ⁵Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, ⁶MedImmune, Cambridge, United Kingdom, ⁷Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
Background/Purpose: Inhibition of GM–CSFR-α is a novel approach to treat RA. Mavrilimumab, an investigational human monoclonal antibody targeting GM–CSFR-α, has demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable…
Abstract Number: 429 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Treatment Preferences of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
Glen S. Hazlewood^1,2, Claire Bombardier³, George A. Tomlinson⁴, Carter Thorne⁵, VP Bykerk⁶, Andrew Thompson⁷, Diane Tin⁸ and Deborah Marshall⁹, ¹Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, ²Institute of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, ³Division of Rheumatology and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, ⁴Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, ⁵Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, ⁶Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, ⁷Rheumatology, St Joseph's Hlth Ctr, London, ON, Canada, ⁸The Arthritis Program, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, ⁹University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Background/Purpose: Treatment choices in early rheumatoid arthritis need to balance benefits, risks, and other considerations such as dosing and monitoring. The objective of this study…
Abstract Number: 2269 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Rheumatologists Consider Patient Preferences and Costs When Choosing Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients. a Cross-European Discrete Choice Experiment
Monika Hifinger¹, Mickaël Hiligsmann², Sofia Ramiro³, Verity Watson⁴, Johan L. Severens⁵, Bruno Fautrel⁶, Loreto Carmona⁷, Till Uhlig⁸, Ronald van Vollenhoven⁹, Peggy Jacques¹⁰, Jacqueline Detert¹¹, Carlo Alberto Scirè¹², Florian Berghea¹³, Márta Péntek¹⁴, Jose canas Silva¹⁵, Andrew Keat¹⁶ and Annelies Boonen¹⁷, ¹Rheumatology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands, ²Department of Health Services Research, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands, ³Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, ⁴Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, ⁵Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, ⁶Rheumatology, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital / Pierre and Marie Curie University Paris 6 GRC-08 (EEMOIS), Paris, France, ⁷Instituto de Salud Musculoesqueletica, Madrid, Spain, ⁸Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, ⁹Rheumatology Unit, The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, ¹⁰University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium, ¹¹Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, ¹²Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan, Italy, ¹³Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology “Sf. Maria” Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania, ¹⁴Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, ¹⁵Rheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, E.P.E., Almada, Portugal, ¹⁶Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom, ¹⁷Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
Background/Purpose: Economic considerations and patient preferences are increasingly important when choosing treatments. It is not known to what extent rheumatologists across Europe account for these…
Abstract Number: 431 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Treatment Target in a Disease Activity Score Steered Treatment Protocol in Early Arthritis Patients: Low Disease Activity or Remission
Gülsah Akdemir¹, Iris M. Markusse², Johannes H.L.M. van Groenendael³, André J. Peeters⁴, Esmeralda T. Molenaar⁵, Pit J.S.M. Kerstens⁶, Willem F. Lems⁷, T. W. J. Huizinga¹ and Cornelia F. Allaart¹, ¹Rheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, ²LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, ³Rheumatology, Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands, ⁴Rheumatology, RDGG, Delft, Netherlands, ⁵Rheumatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands, ⁶Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ⁷Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Background/Purpose: To compare physicians' opinion on and adherence to treatment study protocols targeted at either Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4 or <1.6. Methods: The BeSt…
Abstract Number: 2313 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Responder Rates and Numbers Needed to Treat Based on Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Including Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) after Sarilumab Treatment during a Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Vibeke Strand¹, Regina Rendas-Baum², George J. Joseph³, Chieh-I Chen⁴, Hubert van Hoogstraten⁵, T. W. J. Huizinga⁶ and Mark C. Genovese⁷, ¹Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, ²QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln, RI, ³Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR), Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, ⁴Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, ⁵Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, ⁶Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, ⁷Division of Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA
Background/Purpose: Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks (q2w). In the phase…
Abstract Number: 447 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Components of Treatment Delay in Rheumatoid Arthritis Differ According to Autoantibody Status
Arthur G Pratt¹, Ben Hargreaves², Dennis W Lendrem², Osman Aslam² and John D Isaacs², ¹Institute of Cellular Medicine (Musculoskeletal Research Group), National Institute for Health Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre based at Newcastle Hospitals Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, ²Institute of Cellular Medicine (Musculoskeletal Research Group), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle Hospitals Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Background/Purpose: Despite a proliferation of early arthritis (EA) clinics intended to expedite the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), patients continue to experience substantial and multifactorial…
Abstract Number: 2491 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Documentation of Disease Activity Score As Part of a Treat to Target Strategy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Sarah Homann¹ and Beth Scholz², ¹Rheumatology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, ²University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX
Background/Purpose: Compared to routine care, the Treat to Target (TTT) strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been validated to improve functional and radiographic outcomes via…
Abstract Number: 458 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
First Year Canadian Experience with Subcutaneous Abatacept in Routine Practice for the Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Orencia Response Program (ORP) Network
Boulos Haraoui¹, Louis Coupal², Radmila Day³, Lionel Budry⁴ and Youb Chalabi⁵, ¹Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal and University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, ²Rheumatology, Institut de recherche en rhumatologie de Montréal (IRRM), Montréal, QC, Canada, ³None, Montreal, QC, Canada, ⁴Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, St-Laurent, QC, Canada, ⁵Bristol Myers Squibb, Montreal, QC, Canada
Background/Purpose: The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of abatacept (ABA) has been available in Canada since January 2014. Here we report first year experience with SC ABA…
Abstract Number: 2656 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Analysis of Morning Stiffness Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity Receiving Delayed-Release Prednisone Plus Dmards As Compared to Placebo Plus Dmards
Rieke Alten¹, Robert J. Holt², Jeffrey D. Kent³ and Frank Buttgereit⁴, ¹Charité Univ Medicine, Berlin, Germany, ²College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois-Chicago, Vernon Hill, IL, ³Medical Affairs, Horizon Pharma, Inc, Deerfield, IL, ⁴Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Background/Purpose: Patient reported outcomes such as morning stiffness are reported frequently in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. But little has been reported about the presence and…

« Previous Page
1
…
3
4
5
6
7
…
10
Next Page »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].