Abstracts tagged "classification criteria"

Abstract Number: 853 • 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Systemic Sclerosis Classification Criteria: Developing Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Sindhu R. Johnson¹, Raymond P. Naden², Jaap Fransen³, Frank H.J. van den Hoogen⁴, Janet E. Pope⁵, Murray Baron⁶, Alan G. Tyndall⁷, Marco Matucci-Cerinic⁸ and Dinesh Khanna on behalf of ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria SSc⁹, ¹Dept of Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, ²Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, Austria, ³Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, ⁴Rheumatology, Rheumatology Centre Sint Maartenskliniek and Radboud university medical center, Ubbergen (Nijmegen), Netherlands, ⁵Medicine/Rheumatology, St. Joseph Health Care London, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, ⁶Pavillion A, Rm 216, Lady David Institute for Medical Research and Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada, ⁷Rheumatology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, ⁸Medicine, Univ Florence, Firenze, Italy, ⁹Div of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Background/Purpose: Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) are being developed. Twenty-three candidate criteria have been identified, but need to be reduced. The objectives of this…
Abstract Number: 767 • 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Patients with Early Inflammatory Arthritis Who Fulfil the 2010 American College Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis Have Increased Mortality Compared to Those Who Do Not: Results From the Norfolk Arthritis Register
Jh Humphreys¹, Suzanne Verstappen², Mark Lunt³, Jackie Chipping⁴, Kimme Hyrich⁵, Tarnya Marshall⁶ and Deborah Symmons⁷, ¹Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit,, Manchester, United Kingdom, ²Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit,, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, ³Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, ⁴Norfolk Arthritis Register, School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice Faculty of Health UEA, Norwich, United Kingdom, ⁵Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, ⁶Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom, ⁷Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester Academy of Health Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Background/Purpose: Mortality is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with the general population. The majority of studies have used the 1987 ACR criteria to…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].