2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

October 19-24, 2018. Chicago, IL.

View by Number View by Title View Sessions

View by Date

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Abstract Number: 821

Comparison of Aortitis Vs Non-Inflammatory Aortic Aneurysms Among Patients Who Undergo Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Abstract Number: 2024

Comparison of B and T Cell Subsets, Cytokine Expression and Synovial Pathology in Down’s Arthritis (DA) and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
Abstract Number: 1186

Comparison of Biologic Discontinuation in Patients with Elderly-Onset Vs Younger-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis
Abstract Number: 1778

Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Features of Arterial Involvement in Takayasu’s Arteritis and Behcet’s Disease
Abstract Number: 2663

Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Profiles in 3575 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with and without Sjögren’s Syndrome: Data from the Spanish Society for Rheumatology Lupus Registry
Abstract Number: 763

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcome between Isolated and Classic Lupus Nephritis
Abstract Number: 1483

Comparison of Clinical Features of Seronegative and Seropositive Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Blinded Data from the Ongoing Phase IIb Trial with the EP4 Receptor Antagonist CR6086 in DMARD-Naïve Patients
Abstract Number: 2711

Comparison of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia Associated with Systemic Sclerosis with That Associated with Other Diseases: Are There Differences?
Abstract Number: 759

Comparison of Length of Stay and Total Hospital Charges for Hospitalizations for Sepsis in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Study of National Inpatient Sample Database 2010 to 2014
Abstract Number: 2647

Comparison of Low-Dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide with Oral Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis: Long Term Follow-up Data
Abstract Number: 56

Comparison of Metabolic Changes in Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Mouse Models
Abstract Number: 1151

Comparison of Methodologic Approaches to Maximize the Validity of Fitbit Device Data for Arthritis-Related Research Purposes
Abstract Number: 2874

Comparison of Missing Data Reporting and Handling in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rheumatoid Arthritis Drug Therapy: A Snapshot Ten Years Apart
Abstract Number: 659

Comparison of MRI and Conventional Radiography for Detection of Structural Changes Typical for Spa – Data from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Cohort
Abstract Number: 786

Comparison of Nailfold Microvascular Damage in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Versus Systemic Sclerosis Patients during a Three Year Follow-up

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].