ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 228

Widespread Chronic Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Potential for Drug-Drug Interactions in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus Patients

Daniel Keebler1, Nicholas Jones1 and Matthew McEnany2, 1Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 2Genesis Research, Hoboken, NJ

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug interactions, Gastrointestinal complications and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster I: Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Poor control of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can lead to the use of corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), which in turn can affect patients’ gastric mucosa and contribute to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD may be treated with acid-reducing agents including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); PPIs are known to interact with a variety of drugs, potentially including investigational therapies in clinical trials. The prevalence of chronic PPI use in RA and SLE patients is not well-known, and therefore the potential for widespread drug-drug interactions in these patients is not well-understood. A better understanding of the details of concomitant medication use in these patient populations could guide more effective therapies in the future. We investigated the prevalence and type of chronic PPI use in RA and SLE populations, with the aim of helping clinicians and investigators to make appropriate treatment decisions, and to highlight the importance of PPI polypharmacy in clinical trial design.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of medication use in RA and SLE patients from 2012-2015 was done using Truven MarketScan® Claims Databases. Algorithms from the literature were used to identify RA and lupus cases, and to stratify by disease severity/line of treatment; these were pressure-tested using sensitivity analyses. Omnibus tests for between-strata differences in PPI use according to disease severity/line of treatment were carried out, followed by pairwise comparisons (n=15 for RA; n=3 for lupus) using Fisher’s exact test correction for multiple comparisons via false discovery rate (FDR).

Results: Roughly one-third of RA and lupus patients in a large claims database were chronic users of PPIs. For SLE patients, this proportion increased with our measure of disease severity. For RA patients, higher use was observed in TNF-IR and BIO-IR patients. Following significant results from our omnibus tests and FDR correction of pairwise comparisons, all but the following four remained significant for RA: csDMARD vs. bDMARD/JAKi; TNF-IR vs. no treatment; TNF-IR vs. multiple treatment; and BIO-IR vs. multiple treatment. For lupus, mild vs. moderate and mild vs. severe comparisons remained significant. Results are given in Table 1.

Conclusion: Chronic use of PPIs is widespread among RA and lupus patients in the MarketScan database. Because PPIs may interact with a number of other medications, providers who treat RA and lupus patients should take care to assess concomitant medication use in these patients, and researchers designing clinical trials should carefully assess the prevalence of PPI use in comparator versus treatment arms to ensure that results are not unduly influenced by PPI use. In each case, attention should be paid to the particular type of PPI used, as pharmacokinetic characteristics of each PPI vary.

Table 1. Chronic PPI Use Among RA and SLE Patients.

Chronic PPI use (n, %)
RA
csDMARD 14,056 (34)
bDMARD/JAKi 8,838 (34)
TNF-IR 304 (40)
BIO-IR 268 (50)
No treatment 3,244 (37)
Multiple treatments 120 (44)
Lupus
Mild (n=1,436) 427 (30)
Moderate (n=782) 334 (43)
Severe (n=6) 5 (83)

Disclosure: D. Keebler, Genentech, Inc, 1, 3; N. Jones, Genentech, Inc., 3; M. McEnany, Genesis Research, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Keebler D, Jones N, McEnany M. Widespread Chronic Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Potential for Drug-Drug Interactions in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/widespread-chronic-use-of-proton-pump-inhibitors-and-potential-for-drug-drug-interactions-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-lupus-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/widespread-chronic-use-of-proton-pump-inhibitors-and-potential-for-drug-drug-interactions-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-lupus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology