ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 271

Who Prescribed Which Osteoporosis Medication to Whom

Jiannong Liu1, Haifebg Guo 1, Tingting Gong 1 and Yi Peng 2, 1Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, 2Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN

Meeting: ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

Keywords: medication, osteoporosis, patient and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Health Services Research Poster I – ACR/ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Several osteoporosis (OP) medicines came on the market in the past two decades, each with its own indications. However, there is no clear information on how the medicines were prescribed in the real world. Using Medicare data, we assessed who prescribed which OP medication for what type of patients.

Methods: Using the 2011-2015 Medicare 20% random sample database, we identified patients who initiated an OP medication during a two years period – October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015, and the specialty of the initial prescribers. OP medications included alendronate, ibandronate (oral and IV formats, separately), risedronate, zoledronic acid, teriparatide, denosumab, raloxifene, and calcitonin; prescriber’s specialties included orthopedic, OB/GYN, geriatric, rheumatologic, endocrinologic, internal medicine or family, and “other.” Patients were aged ≥65 years at initiation and covered by Medicare Parts A and B for at least 2 years and by Medicare Part D for at least 1 year before initiation. Initiation was defined as first use in the period and no use of the same medicine for at least 1 year before. Patients could be on other OP medications before this initiation. For each medication group, we assessed patient demographics (age, race, sex, and geographic regions), history of fractures (hip, vertebral, other), comorbid conditions, which may be associated with increased fracture risk, and previous OP medication use.

Results: In all, 203,305 patients were included; 4.6% initiated more than one medicine (one by one, not simultaneously) in this period. The largest medication group was denosumab users (123,128), followed by alendronate (50,559) users; the smallest groups were IV ibandronate (548) and teriparatide (3,779) users. Calcitonin users were the oldest (mean age 78.9 years) and denosumab users the youngest (72.8). About 10% of users were men for all medicines except for raloxifene (< 1%) and denosumab (34.5%). More calcitonin and teriparatide users were at high risk of fracture (with previous fracture or more comorbidity) and a large percentage had recent fractures, especially vertebral; more ibandronate and teriparatide users switched from (other) bisphosphonates. OP medication was mostly prescribed by internal/family (47.2%) and “other” (32.1%) doctors. However, this varied by medication; except for high percentages of internal/family and “other” doctors, about 40% of IV bisphosphonates were prescribed by rheumatologists; 10.4%, 18.5%, and 14.8% of teriparatide by orthopedists,  rheumatologist, and endocrinologists; 11.8% of raloxifene by OB/GYN; and 11.9% of risedronate by rheumatologists. For details, see Table 1.

Conclusion: This study found that, in the Medicare population, denosumab was prescribed for the most patients and was used by more men; calcitonin was mainly prescribed for older women; calcitonin and teriparatide were prescribed for more patients at high risk of fracture; and OP medications were mainly prescribed by internal/family and “other” doctors. Internal medicine and family doctors should remain updated regarding osteoporosis treatment-related research results. A study limitation is that prescriber information was not complete for IV medications.  


Disclosure: J. Liu, None; H. Guo, None; T. Gong, None; Y. Peng, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liu J, Guo H, Gong T, Peng Y. Who Prescribed Which Osteoporosis Medication to Whom [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/who-prescribed-which-osteoporosis-medication-to-whom/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/who-prescribed-which-osteoporosis-medication-to-whom/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology