ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 271

Who Prescribed Which Osteoporosis Medication to Whom

Jiannong Liu1, Haifebg Guo 1, Tingting Gong 1 and Yi Peng 2, 1Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, 2Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: medication, osteoporosis, patient and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Health Services Research Poster I – ACR/ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Several osteoporosis (OP) medicines came on the market in the past two decades, each with its own indications. However, there is no clear information on how the medicines were prescribed in the real world. Using Medicare data, we assessed who prescribed which OP medication for what type of patients.

Methods: Using the 2011-2015 Medicare 20% random sample database, we identified patients who initiated an OP medication during a two years period – October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015, and the specialty of the initial prescribers. OP medications included alendronate, ibandronate (oral and IV formats, separately), risedronate, zoledronic acid, teriparatide, denosumab, raloxifene, and calcitonin; prescriber’s specialties included orthopedic, OB/GYN, geriatric, rheumatologic, endocrinologic, internal medicine or family, and “other.” Patients were aged ≥65 years at initiation and covered by Medicare Parts A and B for at least 2 years and by Medicare Part D for at least 1 year before initiation. Initiation was defined as first use in the period and no use of the same medicine for at least 1 year before. Patients could be on other OP medications before this initiation. For each medication group, we assessed patient demographics (age, race, sex, and geographic regions), history of fractures (hip, vertebral, other), comorbid conditions, which may be associated with increased fracture risk, and previous OP medication use.

Results: In all, 203,305 patients were included; 4.6% initiated more than one medicine (one by one, not simultaneously) in this period. The largest medication group was denosumab users (123,128), followed by alendronate (50,559) users; the smallest groups were IV ibandronate (548) and teriparatide (3,779) users. Calcitonin users were the oldest (mean age 78.9 years) and denosumab users the youngest (72.8). About 10% of users were men for all medicines except for raloxifene (< 1%) and denosumab (34.5%). More calcitonin and teriparatide users were at high risk of fracture (with previous fracture or more comorbidity) and a large percentage had recent fractures, especially vertebral; more ibandronate and teriparatide users switched from (other) bisphosphonates. OP medication was mostly prescribed by internal/family (47.2%) and “other” (32.1%) doctors. However, this varied by medication; except for high percentages of internal/family and “other” doctors, about 40% of IV bisphosphonates were prescribed by rheumatologists; 10.4%, 18.5%, and 14.8% of teriparatide by orthopedists,  rheumatologist, and endocrinologists; 11.8% of raloxifene by OB/GYN; and 11.9% of risedronate by rheumatologists. For details, see Table 1.

Conclusion: This study found that, in the Medicare population, denosumab was prescribed for the most patients and was used by more men; calcitonin was mainly prescribed for older women; calcitonin and teriparatide were prescribed for more patients at high risk of fracture; and OP medications were mainly prescribed by internal/family and “other” doctors. Internal medicine and family doctors should remain updated regarding osteoporosis treatment-related research results. A study limitation is that prescriber information was not complete for IV medications.  


Disclosure: J. Liu, None; H. Guo, None; T. Gong, None; Y. Peng, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liu J, Guo H, Gong T, Peng Y. Who Prescribed Which Osteoporosis Medication to Whom [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/who-prescribed-which-osteoporosis-medication-to-whom/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/who-prescribed-which-osteoporosis-medication-to-whom/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology