ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0842

What Is the Success Rate in Clinical Trials of Discontinuation Glucocorticoids After Their Use as Bridging Therapy – a Systematic Literature Review

Lotte van Ouwerkerk1, Isabell Nevins1, Patrick Verschueren2, Josef Smolen3, Robert Landewé4, Johannes Bijlsma5, Andreas Kerschbaumer3, Tom WJ Huizinga1, Rene Westhovens6, Cornelia F. Allaart1 and Sytske Anne Bergstra1, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2University Hospitals Leuven - KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium, 3Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 4Amsterdam Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, Netherlands, 5Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6University Hospitals KU Leuven, Maaseik, Belgium

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: adults, glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis, systematic review, tapering

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Comparative Effectiveness, Biosimilars, Withdrawal, & the Real World (0813–0845)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Short-term glucocorticoid (GC) bridging therapy results in rapid suppression of disease activity during the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with DMARDs. But there are concerns that many patients may not be able to discontinue GC, risking adverse events. We reviewed the literature to investigate the success rate of GC discontinuation during 24 months of follow-up in trials using GC as bridging therapy.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, COCHRANE library, Emcare and Academic Search Premier to find clinical trials about RA patients treated with (also) initial GC bridging with at least 12 months follow-up. Studies were excluded according to a decision rule (see flowchart in figure 1). Heterogeneity was assessed based on pre-defined items, describing patient characteristics, initial GC bridging scheme, additional treatment and treatment adjustment protocols. Studies were assessed for continuation or restarting of GC after the induction scheme.

Results: The literature search identified 7160 abstracts (flowchart in figure 1). Based on reviewing the first 100 abstracts, we found a 97% interobserver agreement between the 3 reviewers (LO, ISN and SAB). The remaining abstracts were screened separately by the reviewers. 350 abstracts were included for full text analysis, resulting in 12 unique studies (table 1). The majority of included patients fulfilled the ACR/EULAR 2010 (53%) or the ACR 1987 (33%) criteria. At baseline, the mean symptom duration ranged from 4 to 7 months and the disease activity score (DAS) ranged from 3.0 to 5.2. All trials started with a DMARD at baseline next to the GC. In 83% of the studies oral GC bridging was used (initial dose ranging between 7.5 and 60 mg/day, the latter always followed by rapid tapering to 7.5 mg/day as maintenance dose, see table 1). Studies starting with a lower initial dose (5 studies) tapering to 5 mg/day (2/5, 40%) or directly to zero (3/5, 60%). Only 4/12 studies reported data on GC use after the GC induction phase, either at 12 (3/4) and/or at 24 (3/4) months follow-up (see table 2). The proportion of patients still using GC ranged from 23 to 44% at 12 months and 10 to 28% at 24 months. One study only started tapering at 12 months; at 24 months 45% of the patients were still using GCs (see table 2). Other outcome measures (e.g. cumulative or average GC dose, number of GC episodes) were reported in even fewer studies. Therefore, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Conclusion: The currently available data do not provide sufficient information on successful GC discontinuation after the induction phase, since initial type and dose of GC tapering schedules differed between studies and the total number of trials with pertinent data was small. However, preliminary data suggest that in the clinical trials assessed, up to 60% of patients have discontinued GCs initially at 12 months follow-up, and up to 70% at 24 months.


Disclosures: L. van Ouwerkerk, None; I. Nevins, None; P. Verschueren, Pfizer, 12, Holder of the Pfizer Chair Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Management at the KU Leuven, Eli Lilly, 2, Nordic Pharma, 2, galapagos, 2, gilead, 2, ABBVIE, 2, Celltrion, 2, BMS, 2; J. Smolen, AbbVie, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Celegene, 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, MSD, 2, 5, Novartis-Sandoz, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Samsung, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; R. Landewé, AbbVie, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6, Astra-Zeneca, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 6, Celgene, 6, Eli-Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Gilead, 6, Galapagos, 6, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, 6; J. Bijlsma, None; A. Kerschbaumer, ABBVIE, 2, bristol-meyers squibb, 2, celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, gilead, 2, Merck Sharp and Dohme, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2; T. Huizinga, None; R. Westhovens, galapagos, 12, advisory board and principal investigator, gilead, 1, celltrion, 1; C. Allaart, Dutch College of Health Insurances, 5, Schering-Plough BV, 5, Centocor Inc., 5, Eli Lilly, 5; S. Bergstra, Pfizer, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Ouwerkerk L, Nevins I, Verschueren P, Smolen J, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Kerschbaumer A, Huizinga T, Westhovens R, Allaart C, Bergstra S. What Is the Success Rate in Clinical Trials of Discontinuation Glucocorticoids After Their Use as Bridging Therapy – a Systematic Literature Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-success-rate-in-clinical-trials-of-discontinuation-glucocorticoids-after-their-use-as-bridging-therapy-a-systematic-literature-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-success-rate-in-clinical-trials-of-discontinuation-glucocorticoids-after-their-use-as-bridging-therapy-a-systematic-literature-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology