ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 753

Vitamin D Improves Systolic Blood Pressure in SLE

Michelle Petri1, Erik Barr2 and Laurence S Magder3, 1Rheumatology Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Epidemiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 3Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: SLE, Vitamin D and hypertension

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Clinical Trial Design and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency is common in SLE. Both a cohort study and a randomized clinical trial have proven that Vitamin D supplementation improves SLE global activity and the urine protein/cr ratio. We assessed whether there was an association between serum Vitamin D and blood pressure.

Methods: This analysis is based on clinic visits of a large SLE cohort after May 2009 when serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was measured regularly. 1305 different patients were observed from 1 to 32 visits (the median was 10). The patients were 92% female, 50% Caucasian, 41% African American. Age ranged from 17 to 89. When the 25-OH Vitamin D level was below 40 mg/ml, the patient was prescribed supplemental vitamin D, usually 50,000 IU weekly.

Results: The “between-person” analysis addressed the question of whether those who tend to have low vitamin D also tend to have high systolic blood pressure. Among patients whose mean vitamin D was under 40, those whose mean vitamin D was 10 points higher had a mean SBP that was 3.8 mmHG lower (p<0.0001). For example, comparing those with a mean of vitamin D of 25 to those with a mean vitamin D of 35, we found a 3.8 mmHG lower mean SBP in the latter group (Table 1). There was no evidence of an association between vitamin D levels and SBP among those with mean vitamin D greater than 40 (p=0.27 or p=0.31 for unadjusted or adjusted analysis respectively). Table 1: Difference in person-specific mean SBP per 10 ng/ml difference in person-specific mean vitamin D

Range of mean Vitamin D Unadjusted Adjusted1
Estimated difference in mean SBP per 10 ng/ml difference in mean Vitamin D (95% CI) P-value Estimated difference in mean SBP per 10 ng/ml difference in mean Vitamin D (95% CI) P-value

0-40 ng/ml

-3.8 (-4.9, -2.8)

<0.0001

-3.5 (-4.5, -2.4)

<0.0001

40+ ng/ml

-0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)

0.27

-0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)

0.31

1 Adjusted for age, age-squared, sex, race, proportion of time on Plaquenil, mean prednisone dose, mean BMI. The “within-person” analysis addressed the question of whether a person tends to have higher SBP when his/her vitamin D is lower than his average vitamin D (Table 2). Table 2: Difference in SBP at each visit per 10 ng/ml difference in the person’s vitamin D at that visit and the person’s average vitamin D.

Range of Vitamin D Unadjusted Adjusted1
Estimated difference in SBP (relative to a person’s average SBP) as a function of differences in a person’s Vitamin D levels (relative to that person’s average Vitamin D levels) P-value Estimated difference in SBP (relative to a person’s average SBP) as a function of differences in a person’s Vitamin D levels (relative to that person’s average Vitamin D levels) P-value

0-40 ng/ml

-1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)

<0.0001

-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)

<0.0001

40+ ng/ml

-0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)

0.48

0.1 (-0.4, 0.1)

0.30

1 Adjusted for age, age-squared, sex, race, proportion of time on Plaquenil, mean prednisone dose, mean BMI. If a person’s vitamin D was higher than her mean vitamin D by 10 ng/ml and she had vitamin D below 40 ng/ml, then the expected blood pressure will decrease by 1.3 mmHG (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Both the “between person” and “within person” analyses provide evidence that among those with vitamin D below 40 ng/ml, a higher vitamin D level was associated with lower systolic BP. As with disease activity, achieving a level above 40 ng/ml did not lead to further improvement. Vitamin D supplementation has now been seen to help not just disease activity but also the most important traditional cardiovascular risk factor, hypertension.


Disclosure: M. Petri, None; E. Barr, None; L. S. Magder, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Petri M, Barr E, Magder LS. Vitamin D Improves Systolic Blood Pressure in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vitamin-d-improves-systolic-blood-pressure-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vitamin-d-improves-systolic-blood-pressure-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology