ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0768

Veteran Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Care Delivery, and Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Nina Carson1, Jeremy Graber2, Shane O'Malley3, Dennis Hanse4, Amy Peters5, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley6 and Michael Bade6, 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 2University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus & the VA Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Aurora, CO, 3Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, 4Eastern Colorado Health Care System & University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 5Eastern Colorado Health Care System and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 6University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus & Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, Rehabilitation, surgery

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0765–0771) Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, & Rehabilitation Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Compared to the general population, Veterans have higher prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, comorbidities, activities of daily living limitations, and healthcare utilization following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite these limitations, there is a significant gap in knowledge regarding how physical therapy care is delivered and what factors influence recovery for Veterans. To address this gap, we examined Veteran outcomes and physical therapy care delivery after TKA.

Methods: We recruited 86 Veterans [74 male, age 68±8 (mean ± standard deviation), body mass index 31±4.5, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1±1] who attended rehabilitation following TKA for ≥1 session in two Veterans Integrated Service Networks. We collected preoperative outcomes for knee range of motion, the timed up and go test, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR). The KOOS JR was collected postoperatively at 90-days (primary outcome) and at 180-days. Physical therapy care outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record from April 2022 to April 2025 including time to physical therapy evaluation, duration of care, and number of visits.   Paired t-tests were performed to assess changes in KOOS JR scores from preoperative values at 90-day and 180-day. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated on the relationship between the 90-day KOOS JR scores and preoperative characteristics (KOOS JR scores, the timed up and go test, knee flexion, knee extension) as well as time to outpatient evaluation, number of visits, and duration of care.

Results: Prior to surgery the Veterans were recorded to have 115±11⁰ of knee flexion, 11.5±4 seconds on the timed up and go test, and a KOOS JR interval score of 49.9±13. On average, 90-day KOOS JR scores were 18.6±2.0 points higher than preoperative scores (95% Confidence Interval 14.8, 22.9, p< .001). On average, the 180-day KOOS JR scores were 26.9±3.4 points higher than preoperative scores (95% Cl 20.0, 33.8, p< .001) and 8.1±2.0 points higher than the 90-day KOOS JR scores (95% Cl 3.9, 12.4, p< .001). Number of visits (11±6 visits, r= -0.26, p< 0.001) and time to outpatient evaluation from (15±14 days, r = -0.25, p< 0.001) were negatively correlated with 90-day KOOS JR scores. Preoperative KOOS JR scores (r = 0.26, p< .001) and preoperative knee flexion (r = 0.16, p< .001) were positively correlated with 90-day KOOS JR scores.

Conclusion: Despite the significant change in scores following TKA, on average these Veterans did not meet the threshold associated with meaningful change in physical function on the 90-day KOOS JR (≥ 27). The negative correlation between the number of visits and time to outpatient evaluation may result from these Veterans having poor recovery, increasing the need for additional services such as home health rehabilitation, sub-acute rehabilitation, or skilled nursing facility stays prior to outpatient physical therapy. Veterans with worse preoperative KOOS JR scores and reduced knee flexion may benefit from enhanced postoperative care. Additionally, factors related to postoperative care pathways should be explored to improve outcomes.


Disclosures: N. Carson: None; J. Graber: None; S. O'Malley: None; D. Hanse: None; A. Peters: None; J. Stevens-Lapsley: None; M. Bade: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carson N, Graber J, O'Malley S, Hanse D, Peters A, Stevens-Lapsley J, Bade M. Veteran Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Care Delivery, and Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/veteran-rehabilitation-physical-therapy-care-delivery-and-outcomes-after-total-knee-arthroplasty/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/veteran-rehabilitation-physical-therapy-care-delivery-and-outcomes-after-total-knee-arthroplasty/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology