ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1584

Validity of the Nurses Health Study II Physical Activity Questionnaire (NHSPAQ) in Estimating Physical Activity in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Maura D. Iversen1, Thomas Quinn2 and Michelle A. Frits3, 1Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 2Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: An accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) is critical to manage rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Accelerometry is an objective measure of PA but is not widely used clinically. The Nurses Health Study Physical Activity Questionnaire (NHSPAQ) is a brief, simple self-report measure used extensively to assess PA in adults with cancer and other chronic illnesses.  Validity of the NHSPAQ has not been determined for estimation of PA in RA. This study examines the validity of the NHSPAQ for adults with RA when compared to accelerometry estimates and data from performance tests

Methods: 32 adults with RA were sampled from a large tertiary care hospital-based arthritis clinic registry, consented and participated in a 1 week accelerometry trial. Medical and demographic data were collected including: age, gender, disease duration, disease activity (RADAI and DAS-CRP3), education, medications, and co-morbidities. At intake, participants completed the NHSPAQ, performed a self-paced 20-m Walk Test and Timed Step Test. Subjects were given an accelerometer to wear for 7 consecutive days and completed a second NHSPAQ at the end of the week. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample. Metabolic equivalents (METs) were derived from the NHSPAQ, accelerometers and the Timed Step Test using standardized algorithms. NHSPAQ validity was assessed by correlating NHSPAQ METs, accelerometer METs and METs derived from performance tests. Bland-Altman plots compared METs derived from the NHSPAQ and accelerometers. Posthoc power calculations were conducted

Results: 78% of subjects were female (mean age=62.1 years (SD=11.2). The mean disease duration of 21 years (SD=10). On average, RA disease was moderately active at intake (mean RADAI = 2.6 (SD=2) and 74% of subjects were taking biologics. The mean timed walk was 16.2 s (SD=3.9) and Timed Step Test METs was 4.7 (SD=0.9). Average weekly physical activity as determined by accelerometer was 33.3 METs (SD=23). A moderate correlation existed between NHSPAQ METs at one week and accelerometer METs (r = .67, p = .0001). Timed Step Test METs had a low correlation with self-reported physical activity levels (NHSPAQ METs) at one week (r = .42, p =.03). No significant correlation was found between disease activity, step test performance and NHSPAQ METs at intake. Bland-altman plots revealed METs derived from the NHSPAQ are more reliable among subjects with moderate to high physical activity levels. Posthoc power calculations suggested the study was appropriately powered

Conclusion: In this sample of adults with long standing relatively well controlled RA, the NHSPAQ appears to be a valid, simple and cost effective method of assessing PA. General fitness measures had a low correlation with weekly self-reported physical activity. Performance of the NHSPAQ appeared less stable among persons with low levels of physical activity. The NHSPAQ appears to be a valid method of assessing physical activity in adults with RA. However, the NHSPAQ may be less useful among persons engaged in low levels of physical activity


Disclosure:

M. D. Iversen,
None;

T. Quinn,
None;

M. A. Frits,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validity-of-the-nurses-health-study-ii-physical-activity-questionnaire-nhspaq-in-estimating-physical-activity-in-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology