Session Information
Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session
Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM
Background/Purpose: Childhood-onset lupus (cSLE) has a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that accurately assess HRQoL and are responsive to change can contribute to improvements in clinical care, and treatment decisions. The PRO Measurement Information System (PROMIS®, http://nihpromis.org) is a publicly available system, supported by the National Institute of Health that measures PROs. Although several accepted legacy HRQoL measures exist for cSLE, the goals of PROMIS are to decrease respondent burden, increase comparison diseases, and increase responsiveness of measured domains. Our objectives were to investigate the validity and responsiveness of the pediatric PROMIS short forms in cSLE in a clinical setting.
Methods: In a longitudinal study 100 cSLE patients completed pediatric PROMIS short forms (anger, anxiety, depressive, fatigue, mobility, upper extremity function, pain interference, peer relations) and legacy HRQoL measures (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Generic Core [GC] & Rheumatology Modules [RM], Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire [CHAQ], Functional Disability Inventory [FDI], and parents completed Child Health Questionnaire [CHQ]) at three study visits approximately three to six months apart. We used legacy measures, physician reported health status change, cross-sectional correlations, and path analyses to evaluate construct validity and responsiveness to change for PROMIS scores.
Results: Participants (80% female; 33% White, 48% Black, 8% other) had a mean age of 15.8 years (SD 2.2) and SLEDAI score of 6.0 (SD 5.9). Completion of the PROMIS short forms averaged seven minutes in total (legacy measures 5 to15 minutes each). Validity of the pediatric PROMIS short forms is supported by moderate to high correlations (Pearson’s r ≥ 0.5) with the scores of various legacy measures (Table 1), and with similar PROMIS domains, respectively, and dissimilar PROMIS domains having low correlations (Pearson’s r ≤ 0.4). Path analyses showed that physician reported changes (e.g., improvement from visit 1 to visit 2) corresponded to parallel change in PROMIS scores (see Table 2). Moreover, the changes were largest for HRQoL scores more closely aligned with clinical change.
Conclusion: The pediatric PROMIS short form measures of HRQoL demonstrated construct validity, and responsiveness to change in a sample of children with cSLE. PROMIS measures can be utilized by clinicians treating cSLE for a more efficient, responsive measure of HRQoL while reducing respondent and clinician time burden.
Table 1. Bivariate correlations between pediatric PROMIS® short forms and legacy measures |
||||||||
Pediatric PROMIS Short Forms Domains |
Anger |
Anxiety |
Depression |
Fatigue |
Mobility |
Upper Extremity Function |
Pain Interference |
Peer Relationships |
SLEDAI* |
0.12 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
0.11 |
-0.23 |
-0.12 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
CHQ – Psychosocial Summary Score (PsS) |
-0.37 |
-0.32† |
-0.33† |
-0.35† |
0.43† |
0.21 |
-0.36† |
0.32† |
CHQ – Physical Summary Score (PhS) |
-0.15 |
-0.24 |
-0.20 |
-0.36† |
0.55† |
0.31† |
-0.40† |
0.03 |
CHAQ |
0.23 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.42† |
-0.67† |
-0.71† |
0.46† |
-0.11 |
PedsQL – GC |
-0.58† |
-0.66† |
-0.64† |
-0.78† |
0.70† |
0.39† |
-0.74† |
0.30† |
PedsQL – RM |
-0.53† |
-0.65† |
-0.60† |
-0.72† |
0.61† |
0.42† |
-0.72† |
0.24 |
SMILEY |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
-0.19 |
-0.06 |
0.30† |
0.03 |
Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) |
0.37† |
0.47† |
0.42† |
0.62† |
-0.73† |
-0.49† |
0.62† |
-0.18 |
Values are correlation coefficients † Represent p-value < 0.05 * Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000
|
Table 2. Change in PROMIS® short form domain score† between visits |
|||||||||
Variable Category |
Anger |
Anxiety |
Depression |
Fatigue |
Mobility |
Upper Extremity Function |
Pain |
Peer Relationships |
|
Visit 2 |
Better |
-0.73 (0.26)* |
-0.34 (0.22) |
-0.36 (0.26) |
-0.65 (0.28)* |
0.39 (0.24) |
0.66 (0.28)* |
-0.55 (0.25)* |
-0.19 (0.29) |
Worse |
-0.17 (0.38) |
-0.18 (0.35) |
0.03 (0.33) |
-0.31 (0.46) |
0.28 (0.29) |
0.57 (0.30) |
-0.32 (0.33) |
0.43 (0.38) |
|
Visit 3 |
Better |
0.05 (0.15) |
-0.10 (0.13) |
0.03 (0.16) |
0.01 (0.15) |
0.26 (0.14) |
0.14 (0.14) |
-0.12 (0.13) |
0.07 (0.17) |
Worse |
0.18 (0.17) |
0.09 (0.15) |
0.05 (0.17) |
0.01 (0.15) |
-0.44 (0.14)* |
-0.16 (0.14) |
0.30 (0.18) |
-0.12 (0.18) |
|
† Values are standardized coefficients (Standard Error) * Represents p-value < 0.05 |
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Jones JT, Wootton J, Ying J, Liberio B, Lee J, Carle A, Schanberg L, Brunner HI. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Modules for Use in Childhood-Onset Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-patient-reported-outcomes-measurement-information-system-promis-modules-for-use-in-childhood-onset-lupus/. Accessed .« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-patient-reported-outcomes-measurement-information-system-promis-modules-for-use-in-childhood-onset-lupus/