ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1928

Utilization of Rapid Telehealth Visits by Advanced Practice Providers for New Patients Referred to a Large Academic Practice with Low Suspicion for Rheumatologic Disease

Naomi Amudala1, Sheilagh McCauley2, Andrew Kanoff3, Joelle Koplin2, Peter Merkel4 and Ethan Craig5, 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 2Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia, PA, 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5University of Pennsylvania, Wallingford, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Access to care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: In most areas in the United States, access to rheumatologists for an initial evaluation is a major challenge resulting in long wait times for first visits. Seeking to address this problem, a new pathway was implemented utilizing rapid telehealth visits (RTV) for new patients with a low suspicion for rheumatologic disease, based on either chart review or self-reported reasons for visit. This report describes the results of this model at a large academic practice, including impact on access, revenue, and operations.

Methods: The Division of Rheumatology is a large academic medical practice with 33 faculty members and 3 advanced practice providers (APPs) seeing >30,000 patients annually across 5 sites.

There are two pathways in which a patient could be scheduled for an RTV. Starting in February, 2021, all internal consults were reviewed by a rheumatology APP via chart review. If there was low suspicion that the patient had a rheumatologic disease, the patient was deemed eligible for an RTV. External referrals underwent a screening process implemented by our centralized access center to determine the reason for visit. If a patient reported a diagnosis that fit our pre-determined list of appropriate diagnoses, an RTV visit was offered. Diagnoses included positive antinuclear antibody, positive rheumatoid factor, non-specific joint pain, chronic pain, and other similar scenarios.  Exclusion criteria included second opinions, patient’s geographic location, and reason for visit. 

Twenty- or thirty-minute virtual appointments were designated for this patient population on APP telehealth schedules, rather than the usual 60-minute in-person new-patient slots.  If indicated, these patients were evaluated in the office for a more comprehensive visit, including a physical exam.

Results: Between February 2021 and May 2024, 1,301 patients completed an RTV.  Average time to initial visit via RTV was 25.2 days compared to 63.8 days for those seen via an in-person new patient visit (NPV).  Of those seen via RTV, 556 (42%) were then seen for at least one follow-up visit, and 253 (20%) patients required more than one follow-up visit. The average billing level for these visits was comparable to longer NPVs among the same group of APPs: 3.9 for RTV, 4.5 for NPV.  However, the RTVs resulted in more RVUs per session since two to three times as many visits were completed in that same hour. There was also strong satisfaction with the program by both APPs and physicians who saw some of the patients in follow-up.  Several aspects of the program continue to be addressed, including measuring visit quality, addressing panel size for APPs resulting from these visits, and determining appropriate diagnoses to include.

Conclusion: RTVs provide an accessible and rapid means of assessment for patients referred to large academic practices with low likelihood of rheumatologic disease.  This model of care delivery is time- and cost-effective with strong satisfaction among patients and providers.  Such a program can be part of creative strategies to address critical shortages of rheumatologists.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Workflow for Rapid Telehealth Visits with example for one scenario detailed.

Supporting image 2

Table 1: Comparison of Rapid Telehealth Visits (RTVs) vs. in-person New-Patient Visits (NPVs) conducted by advanced practice providers


Disclosures: N. Amudala: Amgen, 2, 6; S. McCauley: None; A. Kanoff: None; J. Koplin: None; P. Merkel: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, argenx, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Cabaletta, 2, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, CSL Behring, 2, Dynacure, 2, Eicos, 5, Electra, 5, EMDSerano, 2, Forbius, 2, 5, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Genzyme/Sanofi, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, HiBio, 2, Immagene, 2, InflaRx, 2, 5, Jannsen, 2, Kiniksa, 2, Kyverna, 2, Magenta, 2, MiroBio, 2, Neutrolis, 2, Novartis, 2, NS Pharma, 2, Pfizer, 2, Q32, 2, 11, Regeneron, 2, Sanofi, 5, Sparrow, 2, 11, Takeda, 2, 5, Talaris, 2, UpToDate, 9, Visterra, 2; E. Craig: Amgen, 1, Calico Life Sciences, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 1, Novartis, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Amudala N, McCauley S, Kanoff A, Koplin J, Merkel P, Craig E. Utilization of Rapid Telehealth Visits by Advanced Practice Providers for New Patients Referred to a Large Academic Practice with Low Suspicion for Rheumatologic Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-rapid-telehealth-visits-by-advanced-practice-providers-for-new-patients-referred-to-a-large-academic-practice-with-low-suspicion-for-rheumatologic-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-rapid-telehealth-visits-by-advanced-practice-providers-for-new-patients-referred-to-a-large-academic-practice-with-low-suspicion-for-rheumatologic-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology