ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1446

Utility of Ultrasound in the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Emergency Rheumatology Clinic: Survey of Clinical Effectiveness

Kuljeet Bhamra1, Catherine Swales1, Matthew Seymour1, Catherine McClinton1 and Peter C. Taylor2, 1Nuffield Department of orthopaedics,rheumatology and musculosketal sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2NDORMS, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ARHP): Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose

The aim of the survey was to evaluate the impact of clinic-based musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) on diagnosis and management of cases seen in the Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital emergency rheumatology clinic.

Methods

MSUS was performed on a selected population of cases, which included new patients with diagnostic uncertainty and challenging follow-up patients requiring assessment of disease activity/severity. The service was provided by a consultant rheumatologist trained and experienced in MSUS; the scans were performed during the emergency clinic appointment. Clinician evaluating patient requested MSUS for confirmation of diagnosis or in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. All scans were performed on a GE Logiq E9 using a linear transducer, recording grey-scale and power Doppler findings. Data from all patients who had undergone scans during October 2011- November 2012 was reviewed for demographics, suspected or existing diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, clinical presentation, clinical findings and management outcome as a direct result of MSUS.

Results

There were 62 patients studied (25 men, 38 women); their mean age was 57.17 years (range 30-88). A set joint scan was performed in all patients consisting of 10 MCP and PIP joints, radiocarpal joint and ulnar styloid.
The new patient group consisted of 34 patients; all had been referred for inflammatory arthritis. Of these, at ultrasound 17 (50%) had osteophytes, 16 (47%) had grey-scale synovitis, with 15 (44%) power Doppler. In one, (3%) no abnormality was detected. This resulted in change in final diagnosis in 22 (65%) new patients and a confirmed diagnosis of active inflammatory arthritis in 12 (35%) patients. Overall, management of new patients directly influenced by ultrasound scan resulted in the discharge of 50% of patients. Of the 17/34 new patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, 14 (82%) started combination disease modifying anti rheumatic agents at first visit.
There were 28 patients in the follow-up group who were referred for diagnostic uncertainty. Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, connective tissue disease accounted for the majority, with 17 (61%), 5 (18%), 4 (14%) and 3 (11%) patients, respectively. The impact of MSUS on the follow-up group influenced change in treatment in 13/28 (47%) of patients. Specifically, all RA patients underwent scanning for disease assessment. In 15/17 (88%) patients, treatment escalation was directly influenced by MSUS findings; co-existing pathology was detected in 3/17 (18%) which included findings of gout and osteoarthritis. Ultrasound remission was identified in 5/17 (30%) with 2/17 (12%) were started on neuromodulators for pain management.

Conclusion

This data shows the positive impact of MSUS in the rheumatology clinic, specifically highlighting multiple benefits in daily practice of reduced visits, discharge at first encounter, immediate management decisions. Our survey shows the importance of integrating MSUS service in a one-stop clinic.


Disclosure:

K. Bhamra,
None;

C. Swales,
None;

M. Seymour,
None;

C. McClinton,
None;

P. C. Taylor,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-ultrasound-in-the-nuffield-orthopaedic-centre-emergency-rheumatology-clinic-survey-of-clinical-effectiveness/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology