ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 665

Utility of Repeat Renal Biopsies in Patients with Lupus Nephritis in Western Australia

Warren Raymond1, Alexandra Kang 2, Daniel Wong 3, Aron Chakera 4 and Johannes Nossent 1, 1School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia, 2PathWest, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 3PathWest, Perth, Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 4Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and biopsy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The role of repeat renal biopsy (RRBx) in lupus nephritis (LN) to guide treatment or predict prognosis is not fully understood. We assessed the association between histopathological changes and clinical outcomes across renal biopsies.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 99 patients with biopsy confirmed lupus nephritis (LN), and 39 (39.4%) patients [mean age 29.2 ± 11.0 years; 89.7% female] who had at least one RRBx (median of 2 renal biopsies; interquartile range: 2, 3) for evaluation of persistent/current symptoms. Renal specimens were assessed by ISN classification (Class I and II grouped as mild disease, Class III + IV as proliferative disease, and Class V as membranous proliferative disease), NIH Activity (0-24) and Chronicity (0-12) indices and immunofluorescence findings (0-3) with data on clinical characteristics, serology, medication, disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index – 2K (SLEDAI-2K)), organ damage (SLICC Damage Index (SDI)) at biopsy recorded. Study endpoints included the doubling of serum creatinine, requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality.

Outcomes were assessed comparatively across biopsy events with non-parametric and Chi-square tests; and, logistic regression quantified the odds of study endpoints.

Results: Compared to patients without repeated biopsies; at the initial biopsy, RRBx patients were younger (29 vs 36 years, p=0.026) and, more likely to be lymphopenic (79.5% vs 60.0%, p=0.04) and had “Full house IF findings” (89.5% vs 62.2%, p=0.03). Patients had similar median proteinuria level (300 vs 257, p=0.70) and SLEDAI scores (13 vs 12, p=0.19). RRBx (n=39) occurred 2.95 years (IQR 1.20, 6.10) after the index biopsy; and, clinical characteristics, laboratory levels and SLEDAI scores were similar to the index biopsy data. Class switching occurred in 9 (23%) patients; with Class worsening in 6 and improvement in 3 (p=0.04). NIH Activity Index was not significantly different from the index biopsy; however, Glomerular Sclerosis (0 vs 1), Interstitial Fibrosis (0 vs 1), and the NIH Chronicity Index (1 vs 2) had worsened at the repeat biopsy, all p< 0.01. Increasing Cellular Crescents increased the odds of RRT [OR 1.7 (95%CI: 1.0, 2.8) p=0.049], and the doubling of serum creatinine at last follow-up [OR 2.0 (95%CI 1.0, 4.00), p=0.05]. Increasing NIH Chronicity Index increased the odds of doubling of creatinine at last follow-up [OR 3.6 (95%CI 1.1, 12.3), p=0.04]. There was no impact of histological findings on repeat biopsy on mortality.

Conclusion: Patients with LN with a RRBx showed low rates of ISN Class switching within 3 years, and NIH Activity Index remained unchanged across biopsies; suggesting that repeat biopsies had little impact on disease management. In contrast, NIH Chronicity Index scores were increased and associated with worse renal outcome.


Disclosure: W. Raymond, None; A. Kang, None; D. Wong, None; A. Chakera, None; J. Nossent, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Raymond W, Kang A, Wong D, Chakera A, Nossent J. Utility of Repeat Renal Biopsies in Patients with Lupus Nephritis in Western Australia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-renal-biopsies-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-in-western-australia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-renal-biopsies-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-in-western-australia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology