ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0725

Utility of Repeat Extractable Nuclear Antigen Antibody Testing- a Retrospective Audit

Ai Li Yeo1, Samar Ojaimi2, Michelle Leech3 and Eric Morand4, 1Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia, 3Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 4Monash University, Victoria; Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Autoantibody(ies)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) are frequently ordered during the diagnostic workup of suspected autoimmune connective tissue diseases. There are no current guidelines for repeat test ordering. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of repeat ENA testing after an initial negative result.

Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a single, multicentre tertiary health network in Melbourne, Australia. Results of all ENA tests, performed using a Luminex bead assay, were extracted from the hospital laboratory information system. For patients who had a change in ENA result from negative to positive, clinical information was obtained from the hospital records regarding new diagnosis of an antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic disease (AARD).

Results: A total of 23,438 ENA tests were performed in 19,603 patients from 29th July 2013 to 28th September 2020. Most results 20,918 (89.2%) were negative with 215 (0.9%) being equivocal. Of the 2,305 positive tests, the most common ENA auto-antibody specificity detected was anti-Ro52 (1,185, 51.4%). 2,636 of 19,603 patients (13.4%) had more than one ENA test performed during the study period. Of these, most (2,523, 95.7%) had stable ENA results with no change compared to the first test. Only 53 patients (2.2%) had an ENA result that changed from negative to positive. Excluding patients with pre-existing rheumatic conditions and those under 18, there were five new AARD found in the remaining 34 patients.

Conclusion: ENA test results rarely change or result in a new diagnosis of an AARD.


Disclosures: A. Yeo, None; S. Ojaimi, CSL Behring; M. Leech, None; E. Morand, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Eli Lilly, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Janssen, Novartis, Servier, UCB, EMD Serono, Billerica, MA, USA.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yeo A, Ojaimi S, Leech M, Morand E. Utility of Repeat Extractable Nuclear Antigen Antibody Testing- a Retrospective Audit [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-extractable-nuclear-antigen-antibody-testing-a-retrospective-audit/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-repeat-extractable-nuclear-antigen-antibody-testing-a-retrospective-audit/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology