ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1283

Utility of FDG-PET Imaging and Serological Biomarkers for Diagnosing Lymphadenopathy of IgG4-Related Diseas

Hiroaki Dobashi, Hiroki Ozaki, Atsushi Kondo, Risa Wakiya, Hiromi Shimada, Shusaku Nakashima, Miharu Izumikawa and Tomohiro Kameda, Internal Medicine Division of Hematology, Rheumatology, and Respiratory Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: IgG4 Related Disease, lymph node and positron emission tomography (PET)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases - Poster II: XR/CT/PET/MRI

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is not rare and clinically important disease. It is difficult to confirm the diagnosis because IgG4 positive lymphocyte infiltrates various organs. Especially, lymphadenopathy is a common manifestation in IgG4-RD. However, it is difficult for the rheumatologist to distinguish its lymphadenopathy from non IgG4-RD. Elevated serum IgG4 level did not decide diagnosis of IgG4-RD. In 2011, comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD were established by Umehara et al. [1]. This criteria required histopathological findings to diagnose IgG4-RD definite. Recent research has shown FDG-PET/CT is useful modality to select biopsy site [2].

Methods: We enrolled 29 cases which suspected IgG4-RD with lymphadenopathy in our facility between 2008 and 2016. Serum IgG4 level was analyzed all patients which were undertaken whole-body FDG-PET/CT study and biopsy. The diagnosis for IgG4-RD was based on comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. Laboratory data were retrospectively collected from their medical records. We investigated levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin, eosinophil/leukocyte ratio, serum IgG and IgG4 levels, sIL2-R levels, the size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and distribution of lymph nodes with abnormal FDG uptake on FDG-PET/CT and pathological findings. We investigate the utility of FDG-PET imaging and serological biomarkers for diagnosing lymphadenopathy of IgG4-RD.

Results:  29 patients were diagnosed into 3 groups (IgG4-RD definite: 12, IgG4-RD possible: 10, non IgG4-RD: 7). Non IgG4-RD group was included infectious disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Sjogren’s syndrome, Castleman’s disease, and malignant lymphoma. No significant differences among 3 groups in levels of CRP or sIL-2R were found. In IgG4-RD definite group, serum IgG4 levels and serum IgG4/IgG ratio were higher than other groups. Serum albumin levels were lower in non IgG4 group compared to others. Eosinophil/leukocyte ratio was higher in IgG4-RD definite group than in possible group. We examined about lymph nodes with abnormal FDG uptake. In IgG4-RD definite group, size of lymph nodes were smaller compared to other 2 groups. There is no difference among 3 groups in SUVmax or distribution of abnormal lymph nodes. Lymph node biopsy were performed in 5 patients with IgG4-RD. In 2 patients who diagnosed IgG4-RD definite, sIL-2R levels were higher and size of abnormal lymph nodes were smaller compared with those in 3 patients diagnosed IgG4-RD possible.

Conclusion: In this study, we examined patients which suspected IgG4-RD with lymphadenopathy. Patients with IgG4-RD definite tended to show higher serum IgG4 levels and smaller size of lymph nodes with abnormal FDG uptake on FDG-PET/CT. No significant differences were found among 3 groups in levels of serum CRP, sIL2-R, SUVmax or distribution of lymph nodes with abnormal FDG uptake. References: [1]Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), 2011. Mod Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;22(1):21-30. [2]Nakatani K. Utility of FDG PET/CT in IgG4-related systemic disease Clin Radiol. 2012 Apr;67(4):297-305.


Disclosure: H. Dobashi, None; H. Ozaki, None; A. Kondo, None; R. Wakiya, None; H. Shimada, None; S. Nakashima, None; M. Izumikawa, None; T. Kameda, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dobashi H, Ozaki H, Kondo A, Wakiya R, Shimada H, Nakashima S, Izumikawa M, Kameda T. Utility of FDG-PET Imaging and Serological Biomarkers for Diagnosing Lymphadenopathy of IgG4-Related Diseas [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-fdg-pet-imaging-and-serological-biomarkers-for-diagnosing-lymphadenopathy-of-igg4-related-diseas/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utility-of-fdg-pet-imaging-and-serological-biomarkers-for-diagnosing-lymphadenopathy-of-igg4-related-diseas/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology