ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 787

Using the American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria to Measure Disease Severity in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Jenna K. Presto1,2, Jessica S. Haber1,2 and Victoria P. Werth1,2, 1Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: classification criteria, cutaneous lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Clinical Trial Design and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) progresses to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in up to 28% of cases. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) SLE criteria were developed to improve the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, but have not been assessed in DLE patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 172 DLE patients enrolled in a cutaneous lupus database at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were assessed for the presence of ACR and SLICC criteria using the database and respective electronic medical records. The Fischer’s exact test was used for each criterion in the ACR and SLICC to determine a difference between patients with DLE/SLE and DLE-only disease.

Results: Using the ACR criteria, 74 patients (52%) were classified as DLE/SLE and 68 (48%) as DLE-only, compared with 66 (46%) DLE/SLE and 76 (54%) DLE-only patients using the SLICC criteria (p=0.08). This net increase of 8 patients meeting ACR criteria was due to the presence of the photosensitivity criterion and fewer immunologic criteria under ACR. Due to the immunologic criteria requirement under SLICC, it can be challenging to determine an SLE diagnosis retrospectively. Overall, DLE/SLE patients were more likely than DLE-only patients to exhibit significant systemic symptoms with regard to arthritis (ACR 73% vs. 9%, p<0.0001; SLICC 70% vs. 18%, p<0.0001), serositis (ACR 22% vs. 0%, p<0.0001; SLICC 22% vs. 3%, p<0.0001), and renal disorder (ACR 27 % vs. 2%, p<0.0001; SLICC 33% vs. 0%, p<0.0001). SLE was more common in generalized DLE than in localized DLE using ACR (p=0.0001) and SLICC (p=0.0068) criteria. DLE/SLE patients were more likely to have worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to ACR criteria, with 40.5% of DLE/SLE patients having CLASITM activity ≥ 10 and 25.0% of DLE-only patients having CLASITM ≥ 10 (Table 1).

Conclusion: DLE/SLE patients have more significant internal disease than DLE patients who do not meet SLE criteria. Our findings trended toward the ACR criteria classifying more DLE patients with SLE than the SLICC criteria, particularly in patients without extensive laboratory testing. DLE-only patients may have significant skin disease with approximately 25% of DLE-only patients having moderate to severe skin disease.  

  DLE with SLE n (%) DLE without SLE n (%)

P-value

CLASITM ≥ 10

30 (40.5)

17 (25.0)

0.0493*

CLASITM < 10

44 (59.5)

51 (75.0)

Table 1A. Skin activity in DLE/SLE vs DLE-only patients using ACR criteria.  DLE/SLE patients are more likely to have worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to the ACR criteria.
 
  DLE with SLE n (%) DLE without SLE n (%)

P-value

CLASITM ≥ 10

27 (40.9)

20 (26.3)

0.0653

CLASITM < 10

39 (59.1)

56 (73.7)

Table 1B. Skin activity in DLE/SLE vs DLE-only patients using SLICC criteria. There is a trend of DLE/SLE patients having worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to the SLICC criteria.  

 


Disclosure: J. K. Presto, None; J. S. Haber, None; V. P. Werth, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Presto JK, Haber JS, Werth VP. Using the American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria to Measure Disease Severity in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-the-american-college-of-rheumatology-and-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-criteria-to-measure-disease-severity-in-discoid-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-the-american-college-of-rheumatology-and-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-criteria-to-measure-disease-severity-in-discoid-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology