ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 787

Using the American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria to Measure Disease Severity in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Jenna K. Presto1,2, Jessica S. Haber1,2 and Victoria P. Werth1,2, 1Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: classification criteria, cutaneous lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Clinical Trial Design and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) progresses to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in up to 28% of cases. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) SLE criteria were developed to improve the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, but have not been assessed in DLE patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 172 DLE patients enrolled in a cutaneous lupus database at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were assessed for the presence of ACR and SLICC criteria using the database and respective electronic medical records. The Fischer’s exact test was used for each criterion in the ACR and SLICC to determine a difference between patients with DLE/SLE and DLE-only disease.

Results: Using the ACR criteria, 74 patients (52%) were classified as DLE/SLE and 68 (48%) as DLE-only, compared with 66 (46%) DLE/SLE and 76 (54%) DLE-only patients using the SLICC criteria (p=0.08). This net increase of 8 patients meeting ACR criteria was due to the presence of the photosensitivity criterion and fewer immunologic criteria under ACR. Due to the immunologic criteria requirement under SLICC, it can be challenging to determine an SLE diagnosis retrospectively. Overall, DLE/SLE patients were more likely than DLE-only patients to exhibit significant systemic symptoms with regard to arthritis (ACR 73% vs. 9%, p<0.0001; SLICC 70% vs. 18%, p<0.0001), serositis (ACR 22% vs. 0%, p<0.0001; SLICC 22% vs. 3%, p<0.0001), and renal disorder (ACR 27 % vs. 2%, p<0.0001; SLICC 33% vs. 0%, p<0.0001). SLE was more common in generalized DLE than in localized DLE using ACR (p=0.0001) and SLICC (p=0.0068) criteria. DLE/SLE patients were more likely to have worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to ACR criteria, with 40.5% of DLE/SLE patients having CLASITM activity ≥ 10 and 25.0% of DLE-only patients having CLASITM ≥ 10 (Table 1).

Conclusion: DLE/SLE patients have more significant internal disease than DLE patients who do not meet SLE criteria. Our findings trended toward the ACR criteria classifying more DLE patients with SLE than the SLICC criteria, particularly in patients without extensive laboratory testing. DLE-only patients may have significant skin disease with approximately 25% of DLE-only patients having moderate to severe skin disease.  

  DLE with SLE n (%) DLE without SLE n (%)

P-value

CLASITM ≥ 10

30 (40.5)

17 (25.0)

0.0493*

CLASITM < 10

44 (59.5)

51 (75.0)

Table 1A. Skin activity in DLE/SLE vs DLE-only patients using ACR criteria.  DLE/SLE patients are more likely to have worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to the ACR criteria.
 
  DLE with SLE n (%) DLE without SLE n (%)

P-value

CLASITM ≥ 10

27 (40.9)

20 (26.3)

0.0653

CLASITM < 10

39 (59.1)

56 (73.7)

Table 1B. Skin activity in DLE/SLE vs DLE-only patients using SLICC criteria. There is a trend of DLE/SLE patients having worse skin disease compared to DLE-only patients when classified according to the SLICC criteria.  

 


Disclosure: J. K. Presto, None; J. S. Haber, None; V. P. Werth, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Presto JK, Haber JS, Werth VP. Using the American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria to Measure Disease Severity in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-the-american-college-of-rheumatology-and-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-criteria-to-measure-disease-severity-in-discoid-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-the-american-college-of-rheumatology-and-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-criteria-to-measure-disease-severity-in-discoid-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology