ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1909

Use of Uric Lowering Therapies within a Large Health Care System

Robert A. Overman1, Brian F. Mandell2 and Chad L. Deal3, 1Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 2Dept of Rheum/Immun NA10, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 3Dept of Rheum & Imm Dis /A 50, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug therapy, gout, treatment and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Guidelines for initiating urate lowering therapy (ULT) in the treatment of gout recommend treatment to a target serum urate (SUA) level of ≤6mg/dl with monitoring of SUA.

Methods:

We reviewed the use of ULT with allopurinol (allop) or febuxostat (febux) in a large health care system between June 2010 and April 2012. Eligible subjects were >18 years at ULT initiation, had a diagnosis of gout, and had ≥ two outpatient prescriptions for a ULT after June 1, 2010. Demographics, ULT dose, prescribing providers, diagnosis, and SUA levels were collected from our EPIC EMR using Explorys Inc. proprietary software. A study author checked agreement of data between the subjects EMR and the Explorys data in random cases within the study population. Cleveland Clinic IRB approval was obtained.

Results:

1,870 subjects were eligible for inclusion: 74.1% male, mean age 62.8 (SD 14.2). Study subjects had been prescribed allop alone (82.5%, n=1543), febux alone (5.9%, n=188), or both (11.6%, n=217). Following initiation of ULT, 68.8% of subjects (n=1286) had a repeat SUA within our health system: 56.1% within 6 months and 65.4% within 12 months of their initial prescription. After initiation of ULT, 45.9% of subjects achieved a level of ≤6mg/dl, 22.0% had levels between 6.1-7.0mg/dl, and 32.1% never had a level ≤7.0mg/dl. There were 523 subjects on allop with SUA measurements ≥7.0mg/dl, yet only 2.3% were prescribed a daily dose of >300mg. Subjects treated by a rheumatologist (60.6%) vs non-rheumatologist (42.0%) were more likely to achieve a SUA ≤6mg/dl, odds ratio 2.1 (95% CI 1.7-2.7). The starting dose of allop was <100mg (1.0%), 100mg (59.6%), 101-300mg (38.8%). For subjects prescribed allop the maximum daily dose was ≤ 100mg in 32.4% and 101-300mg in 65.0% of subjects. Maximum dose of allop was greater than 300mg in 2.7% of subjects seen by a rheumatologist and 2.6% of non-rheumatologists. The starting dose of febux was ≤ 40mg in 87.9% of subjects. Of those who did not achieve a SUA level ≤6.0mg/dl, 38.4% had ULT adjusted to a higher dose (ULT adjustment to target may not have been completed by the time of analysis). Only 11.3% of subjects started on febux had documented allop intolerance. A statistically significant difference was found in the mean creatinine level closest to the initiation of ULT (1.3 allop vs 1.5 febux p<0.001) which may indicate renal insufficiency as a perceived reason for febuxostat.

Conclusion:

Only 45.9% of patients started on ULT achieved recommended SUA levels, only 38.4% of those not meeting target had a documented dose adjustment and > 97% of patients on allop were on < 300mg per day. This demonstrates a persistent care gap in the treatment of gouty arthritis.


Disclosure:

R. A. Overman,
None;

B. F. Mandell,

Regeneron,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Savient,

5;

C. L. Deal,

Amgen, Lilly,

5,

Amgen, Lilly,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-uric-lowering-therapies-within-a-large-health-care-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology