ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1534

Use and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Among Patients with Lupus Nephritis and Clinical Indications

April Jorge1, Kila Panchot2, Baijun Zhou2, Aakash Patel1 and Hyon K. Choi3, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Lexington, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: comparative effectiveness, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have nephroprotective and cardioprotective benefits and may have a role in lupus nephritis (LN) treatment. 2023 EULAR SLE treatment guidelines indicate that SGLT2i may be considered in patients with LN with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60-90 ml/min/m2 or proteinuria >0.5-1.0 g/day (Fanouriakis et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2024). We sought to assess recent use of SGLT2i and adverse events among patients with LN.

Methods: We utilized data from the US Mass General Brigham (MGB) electronic health record database. We identified all patients with LN (defined as ≥2 codes for SLE >30 days and < 2 years apart and ≥1 LN code ICD-10 M32.14 or M32.15 or ≥2 ICD-9 or 10 nephritis codes) who were eligible to receive an SGLT2i between March 2013 and February 2024: without type 1 diabetes or end-stage kidney disease, with baseline GFR > 30 ml/min/m2, and with GFR below 90 ml/min/m2 and/or proteinuria >0.5 g/day. We also assessed two alternative definitions of indications for SGLT2i: requiring GFR < 60 ml/min/m2 and/or proteinuria >1.0 g/day or requiring GFR < 90 ml/min/m2 and/or proteinuria >0.5 g/day at least six months after LN onset, coinciding with the typical maintenance phase of treatment. We identified all eligible patients with LN who initiated SGLT2i. Among SGLT2i non-users, we identified patients who initiated angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB). We assessed characteristics at the date of meeting eligibility criteria. We compared the risk of adverse events within 12 months following SGLT2i or ACEi/ARB initiation, including genitourinary infections, acute kidney injury, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and fractures. We used logistic regression, adjusting for age, diabetes, glucocorticoids, and SLE immunosuppressant use. We also assessed changes in body weight.

Results: Of 1416 patients with LN, 1132 met the primary eligibility criteria for SGLT2i use, 935 met the eligibility criteria with stricter GFR or proteinuria cutoffs, and 418 met eligibility criteria in the maintenance phase (Figure 1). Of those meeting the primary eligibility criteria, 69 (6%) initiated an SGLT2i and 562 (50%) initiated an ACEi/ARB (Table 1). The mean age of SGLT2i users was 55 years, vs. 50 years among all eligible patients with LN, and 80% were female vs 87% of eligible patients with LN were female. 20% of SGLT2i users were Black vs. 18% with LN. Comorbidities among SGLT2i users included 20% with type 2 diabetes, 9% with heart failure, and 19% with CKD stage ≥3. Adverse event rates were similar among SGLT2i initiators vs ACEi/ARB initiators with LN (Table 2). There were no cases of necrotizing fasciitis or DKA. SGLT2i users had mean weight loss of 1.9 kg vs. 0.5 kg for ACEi/ARB users (p=0.19).

Conclusion: In this clinical cohort of patients with LN and a potential indication for SGLT2i use, SGLT2i were infrequently used in recent years. Compared with ACEi/ARB users, SGLT2i users had similar rates of adverse events, including genitourinary infections and fractures. Further follow-up studies are needed to determine the impact of SGLT2i on long-term kidney outcomes in LN and to determine the optimal eligibility criteria for patients with LN.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Study Cohort and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter_2 Inhibitor Use Among Eligible Patients with Lupus Nephritis

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Characteristics of Patients with Lupus Nephritis and an Indication to Consider SGLT2i Use

Supporting image 3

Table 2. Comparison of Adverse Events Within 12 Months After Starting an SGLT2 Inhibitor or ACEi/ARB Therapy Among Patients with Lupus Nephritis


Disclosures: A. Jorge: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 12, Site investigator for a clinicl trial, Cabaletta Bio, 12, Site Sub-investigator for a clinical trial; K. Panchot: None; B. Zhou: None; A. Patel: None; H. Choi: Ani, 1, Horizon, 1, 5, LG, 1, Protalix, 1, Shanton, 12, DSMB.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jorge A, Panchot K, Zhou B, Patel A, Choi H. Use and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Among Patients with Lupus Nephritis and Clinical Indications [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-and-safety-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2-inhibitors-among-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-and-clinical-indications/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-and-safety-of-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2-inhibitors-among-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-and-clinical-indications/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology