ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0209

Upadacitinib as Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results at 84 Weeks

Josef Smolen1, Paul Emery2, William Rigby3, Yoshiya Tanaka4, Juan Vargas5, Nemanja Damjanov6, Manish Jain7, Yanna Song8, Nasser Khan9, Jeffrey Enejosa9 and Stanley Cohen10, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Dartmouth College, Norwichi, VT, 4The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 5Quantum Research, Puerto Varas, Chile, 6University of Belgrade Medical School, Belgrade, Serbia, 7Great Lakes Clinical Trials, Chicago, IL, 8AbbVie Inc., North Chicago,, IL, 9AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 10Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: RA Treatments & Their Safety

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the SELECT-MONOTHERAPY trial, upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared to continuing methotrexate (MTX) when used as monotherapy over 14 weeks (wks) in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prior inadequate response to MTX.1 Here we describe the long-term safety and efficacy of UPA monotherapy in an ongoing long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-MONOTHERAPY trial.

Methods: Pts on stable MTX were randomized to either continue MTX (cMTX, given as blinded study drug) or switch to once-daily (QD) UPA 15 (UPA15) or 30 (UPA30) mg monotherapy for 14 wks. From Wk14, pts could enter a blinded LTE and continue to receive UPA15 or UPA30; pts randomized to cMTX were switched to UPA15 or UPA30 per pre-specified assignment at baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 pt yrs (PYs) of exposure are summarized up to a cut-off data of 5 February 2019, when all pts had reached Wk84. Efficacy outcomes through Wk84 are reported as observed and using non-responder imputation.

Results: Of 648 pts randomized, 598 (92%) completed 14 wks and entered the LTE on blinded UPA. By the cut-off date, 20% in total had discontinued due to the following: AE (6%), consent withdrawal (4%), lost to follow-up (2%), lack of efficacy (1%), or other reasons (7%). Cumulative exposures were 421.5 and 425.9 PYs for UPA15 and UPA30, respectively. The most frequently reported TEAEs were urinary tract infection, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, worsening of RA, bronchitis, herpes zoster (HZ), and alanine aminotransferase increase; the most common serious AE was pneumonia. Events of HZ, hepatic disorder, and CPK elevations were higher among pts receiving UPA30, while rates of serious infection and malignancy appeared comparable between doses (Figure). Most HZ events involved 1-2 dermatomes, with a single disseminated cutaneous event (UPA30) and none with CNS involvement. Five patients experienced MACE, and there were 5 VTE events (UPA15: 4; UPA30: 1). All MACE and VTE events occurred in pts with underlying risk factors. Pts continuing to receive UPA15 and UPA30 achieved stringent endpoints at Week 84 (Table). Pts who switched from cMTX to UPA15 or UPA30 demonstrated comparable efficacy responses to those initially randomized to UPA.

Conclusion: The adverse event profile associated with long-term exposure to UPA15 or 30 as monotherapy was consistent with an integrated analysis of UPA safety across the entire phase 3 program, with no new safety signals identified. Further, UPA15 or 30 monotherapy resulted in continued and sustained improvements in RA signs and symptoms through 84 wks.

References:
               1. Smolen, et al. Lancet 2019;393:2303-11.
                   Original abs: Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(S1):327.


Disclosure: J. Smolen, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Celltrion, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, ILTOO, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Kabi, 5, 8, Novartis-Sandoz, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, 8, Samsung, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; P. Emery, AbbVie, 2, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, 8, Pfizer, 8, Roche, 2, 8, Celltrion, 8, Eli Lilly, 8, Gilead, 8, Novartis, 2, 8, Samsung, 8; W. Rigby, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Genentech, 5, Pfizer, 5; Y. Tanaka, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Asahi-kasei, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Astellas, 2, 5, 8, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 5, 8, Eisai, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Takeda, 2, 5, 8, YL Biologics, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8; J. Vargas, AbbVie, 9; N. Damjanov, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Richter Gedeon, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8; M. Jain, AbbVie, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Medac, 5, 8, Takeda, 5, 8; Y. Song, AbbVie, 1, 2; N. Khan, AbbVie, 1, 2; J. Enejosa, AbbVie, 1, 3; S. Cohen, Amgen Inc, 1, 2, AbbVie, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Sandoz, 1, 2, Gilead, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smolen J, Emery P, Rigby W, Tanaka Y, Vargas J, Damjanov N, Jain M, Song Y, Khan N, Enejosa J, Cohen S. Upadacitinib as Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results at 84 Weeks [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/upadacitinib-as-monotherapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-prior-inadequate-response-to-methotrexate-results-at-84-weeks/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/upadacitinib-as-monotherapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-prior-inadequate-response-to-methotrexate-results-at-84-weeks/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology