ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 409

Unique Skeletal Muscle Relaxant Tolperisone in a Crossover Driving Simulation Study: No Evidence of Sedation Compared to Cyclobenzaprine and Placebo

Judy Caron1, Thomas Wessel2 and Gary Kay3, 1Drug Development, Neurana Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, 2Medical, Neurana Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, 3Drug Development, Cognitive Research Corporation, St Petersburg, FL

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction, low back pain and musculoskeletal disorders

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation Poster – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Tolperisone is a centrally-acting muscle relaxant being developed in the US as a treatment for acute and painful symptoms of neck and low back muscle spasms. Tolperisone historically has shown both muscle relaxant and analgesic effects without sedation in placebo-controlled and head-to-head clinical studies in Europe and Asia. The present study explores the impact of tolperisone on driving simulation endpoints, self-reported sleepiness, and cognition compared to placebo and cyclobenzaprine.

Methods:

The study was a 3-way, randomized, blinded, crossover study assessing the safety and cognitive effects of tolperisone in 31 healthy volunteers. Treatment groups included 450 mg tolperisone administered three-times-a-day (150 mg TID), 30 mg cyclobenzaprine (10 mg TID), and placebo (TID). Participants spent the first three days of three consecutive weeks in the research unit. Dosing occurred in the morning (AM) and at midday (PM) on Days 1-3 and at bedtime on Days 1 and 2. Subjects were administered a digit symbol substitution test followed by 100 km (60 minute) of simulated driving on Day 1 one hour after their midday dose (at drug Tmax), and again the morning of Day 2 (pre-dosing) to assess next day residual effects. They were also tested the morning of Day 3 (post-dose) to assess the drug at steady-state. Subjects returned to the clinic on Days 7 and 14 to repeat these procedures.

Results:

For the primary endpoint of Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) over 100-km of driving, tolperisone was no different than placebo, whereas cyclobenzaprine showed significant impairment (p=<0.001). Results from secondary endpoints, including cognitive test findings, support this conclusion.

The distribution of SDLP for the placebo and tolperisone test conditions showed symmetry around zero, while cyclobenzaprine was markedly different; a subset of subjects in this study had a level of impairment associated with increased crash risk, as demonstrated by SDLP values above 4.4 cm in this test paradigm (consistent with normative Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) levels of above 0.05%).

Secondary measures confirmed the finding of absence of sedation for tolperisone relative to placebo: Digit Symbol Coding Day 1 p= 0.84, Day 2 p= 0.21, Day 3 p= 0.12; and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale: Day 1 p= 0.47, Day 2 p= 0.47, and Day 3 p= 0.49. Additional measures of driving indicated no impairment for tolperisone versus placebo.

Of note in this study, patients taking cyclobenzaprine perceived a distinct lack of effect discrimination and reported feeling safe to drive on Days 2 and 3, while demonstrating impairment based on their SDLP and other secondary endpoint outcomes.

Conclusion:

Tolperisone at a dose of 150 mg TID was found to have no impact, compared to placebo, on various measures of driving, self-reported sleepiness, and cognition, in contrast to the widely used muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine at a dose of 10 mg TID. Because of its long half-life and anticholinergic activity, cyclobenzaprine is not recommended for use in the elderly and has been associated with an increase in falls and injury. Data from this study confirms impairment in cognition and driving for healthy subjects taking cyclobenzaprine.


Disclosure: J. Caron, Neurana Pharmaceuticals, 3; T. Wessel, Neurana Pharmaceuticals, 1; G. Kay, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Caron J, Wessel T, Kay G. Unique Skeletal Muscle Relaxant Tolperisone in a Crossover Driving Simulation Study: No Evidence of Sedation Compared to Cyclobenzaprine and Placebo [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/unique-skeletal-muscle-relaxant-tolperisone-in-a-crossover-driving-simulation-study-no-evidence-of-sedation-compared-to-cyclobenzaprine-and-placebo/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/unique-skeletal-muscle-relaxant-tolperisone-in-a-crossover-driving-simulation-study-no-evidence-of-sedation-compared-to-cyclobenzaprine-and-placebo/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology