ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1200

Unilateral Ultrasound Scoring Methods for Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Agreement Study Exploring the Most Inflammatory Active Side

Lene Terslev1, Robin Christensen2, Anna-Birgitte Aga3, Joseph Sexton3, Espen A. Haavardsholm3 and Hilde B. Hammer4, 1Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark, 2Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark, 3Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Dept. of Rheumtology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: Ultrasound

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Several unilateral scoring systems have been proposed to increase the feasibility of ultrasound (US) for joint evaluation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Both the clinically most affected side and the dominant hand have been proposed as the default monitoring approach during treatment, however, no consensus exists on which side to choose. the aim is to evaluate if the dominant hand or the hand with more clinically swollen joints is per default the more inflammatory active side, as judged by US, to be chosen for unilateral scoring systems in RA patients.

Methods:

We performed an agreement study exploring the impact on US scoring methods in a cross-sectional study of an early RA (ARCTIC trial, n=230) and established RA cohort (ULRABIT trial, n=212) with patients initiating conventional and biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs, respectively. Tender and swollen joint count for 28 joints (TJC28 and SJC28) and C-reactive protein (CRP mg/L) were obtained. Using the hands as model, bilateral MCP 1-5, PIP 2+3 and wrists were evaluated by US using a 0–3 scoring system for both grey-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) US according to the atlas by Hammer et al. A GS sum score, a PD sum score and a global synovitis score (GLOSS) were calculated for each hand (0-30). According to our prespecified protocol a reasonable equivalence margin in this study (agreement between groups) was defined to correspond to a 95% Confidence Interval around the observed paired mean difference: -2.99 to +2.99; a difference of at least 3 in sum score defined a clinical significant difference defining which hand was more inflammatory active.

Results:

In total, 442 RA patients were included; 71% women, 79% anti-CCP pos, 71% RF pos, median(IQR) age 54(42-62) years, CRP 7(3-16), SJC28 5(3-26) and TJC28 6(2-28). The median(IQR) PD sum score was 3(0-7) for right hand and 2(0-5) for left hand, GS sum score was 5(2-9) for both hands, and GLOSS was 5(2-10) for right hand and 5(2-9) for left hand.

The dominant hand was not more inflammatory active than the non-dominant (mean difference, 95%CI) for PD sum score -0.58(-1.35 to 0.2), GS sum core -0.69(-1.61 to 0.24) and GLOSS -0.79(-1.76 – 0.18). This was in clear contrast to analyses of the hand with more swollen joints which was statistically significantly more inflammatory active (p<0.0001): for PD sum score 1.70(0.94 to 2.47), GS sum score 2.21(1.30 to 3.12) and GLOSS 2.31(1.36 to 3.26) – see table.

Conclusion:

Based on this study, the dominant hand is not significantly more affected than the non-dominant hand regarding inflammatory activity evaluated by US. As the hand with clinically more swollen joints are more inflammatory active by PD sum score, GS sum score and GLOSS, the hand with most swollen joints is suggested to be chosen as basis for unilateral scoring systems.


Disclosure: L. Terslev, Danish Rheumatism Association, 2, 8,AbbVie Inc., Roche, Novartis, 8; R. Christensen, None; A. B. Aga, None; J. Sexton, None; E. A. Haavardsholm, None; H. B. Hammer, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Terslev L, Christensen R, Aga AB, Sexton J, Haavardsholm EA, Hammer HB. Unilateral Ultrasound Scoring Methods for Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Agreement Study Exploring the Most Inflammatory Active Side [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/unilateral-ultrasound-scoring-methods-for-synovitis-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-an-agreement-study-exploring-the-most-inflammatory-active-side/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/unilateral-ultrasound-scoring-methods-for-synovitis-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-an-agreement-study-exploring-the-most-inflammatory-active-side/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology