ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 2725

Understanding Vasculitis Patients’ Ability to Work with Numbers

Cole Rodman1, Mary-Kate Tompkins1, Holly Steigelman2, Brad H. Rovin3, Stacy P. Ardoin4, Ellen Peters5 and Alexa Meara6, 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 3Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 4Pediatric & Adult Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 5Decision Research, Eugene, OR, 6Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: patient engagement, Patient participation, shared dicision making and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Vasculitis Poster III: Other Vasculitis Syndromes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the case of a complex disease like vasculitis, the patient is often tasked with understanding complicated care plans and managing myriad medications. Without appropriate support for these tasks, however, poor health outcomes may result. Recently, shared decision-making (SDM) has become a strategy for effective disease management, with the focus on the physician’s ability to communicate. However, little attention has been paid to the manner in which the abilities and background of the patient interact with the communication and decision-making process. For this project, the following measures were obtained: patient activation (PAM), a measure of patient engagement, objective numeracy (ONS), a measure of objective math skills, subjective numeracy (SNS), a measure of self-reported math skills, health literacy (sTOFHLA), the Brigham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), and the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI), measures of activity and damage respectively.

Methods: Participants (N=43) were recruited from the Ohio State University Lupus, Vasculitis, and Glomerulonephritis (LVG). Subjects completed each of the measures indicated above. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), r, was calculated for each of the variable pairs shown in Table 1. Some subjects were missing data. All available data for each variable were used.

Results: 37 out of the 43 patients had ANCA associated-vasculitis and 3 patients had Takayasu’s vasculitis, one patient each had eosinophilic polyangiitis, CNS vasculitis and Behcet’s syndrome. The ONS scores were relatively low (mean = 3.85 out of a possible 8 maximum score) while the mean PAM score was high (mean = 3.23 out of a possible 4 maximum score). All but one subject had above normal health literacy scores (sTOFHLA > 23). Table 1 illustrates correlations between variables.

Conclusion: Currently, very little evidence exists about the relations between patient activation, numeracy, and disease outcomes in vasculitis patients. Interestingly, although many patients had high patient activation and adequate health literacy scores, they had low math and numerical skills. Subjective and objective numerical ability were correlated, indicating patients who believed they were skilled numerically actually were. Higher activation scores were strongly negatively correlated with both disease damage and activity, indicating that greater engagement in care corresponded to lower disease damage and activity. Surprisingly, higher ONS scores trended with higher disease damage, a relationship that, if it proves robust, merits future investigation.

Health Literacy

SNS

ONS

Patient Activation

SNS

Pearson’s r

0.068

p value

0.736

N=

27

ONS

Pearson’s r

0.372

0.399

p value

0.061

0.043

N=

26

26

Patient Activation Measure

Pearson’s r

0.263

0.280

0.215

p value

0.195

0.166

0.291

N=

26

26

26

Disease

Activity

(BVAS)

Pearson’s r

-0.194

-0.166

-0.056

-0.533

p value

0.332

0.408

0.786

0.005

N=

27

27

26

26

Disease

Damage

(VDI)

Pearson’s r

0.011

-0.034

0.199

-0.578

p value

0.957

0.866

0.329

0.002

N=

27

27

26

26

SNS= Subjective Numeracy; ONS= Objective numeracy


Disclosure: C. Rodman, None; M. K. Tompkins, None; H. Steigelman, None; B. H. Rovin, None; S. P. Ardoin, not applicable, 9; E. Peters, None; A. Meara, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rodman C, Tompkins MK, Steigelman H, Rovin BH, Ardoin SP, Peters E, Meara A. Understanding Vasculitis Patients’ Ability to Work with Numbers [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-vasculitis-patients-ability-to-work-with-numbers/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-vasculitis-patients-ability-to-work-with-numbers/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology