ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1116

Understanding the Prevalence, In-Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates Amongst Pulmonary vs Cardiac Sarcoidosis Patients: Insights from a Nationwide Registry

Shivang Chaudhary1, Kaushik Gokul1, Kishan Patel2, Simran Bhimani3, Yash Deshpande3, Adam Kilian1, Ravi Nayak1, Deana Mikhalkova1 and Chaitanya Rojulpote1, 1Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 2Riverside Community Hospital, Riverside, CA, 3The Wright Center for graduate medical education, Scranton, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Comorbidity, Cost-Effectiveness, Mortality

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic & Inflammatory Diseases Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sarcoidosis is a complex, multisystemic disorder predominantly affecting the pulmonary system but can also involve extra-pulmonary organs such as the heart. Mortality in sarcoidosis varies from < 1% to approximately 8% and depends largely on the organ affected, with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) accounting for nearly two-thirds of deaths. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, in-hospital mortality, and readmission rates in patients admitted with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) vs pulmonary sarcoidosis (PS).

Methods: The National Readmission Database, between years 2016-2020, was used to identify cardiac and pulmonary sarcoidosis admissions with the following ICD-10 codes D860, D862, and D8685. Patients under 18 years of age were excluded. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18.0 software. 

Results: From 2016 to 2020, 103,403 patients were identified; 6.3% had CS (n=6,498, mean age: 58 years, female=40.9%) while 93.7% had PS (n=96,905, mean age: 62 years, female=59.6%). At baseline, CS patients had significantly higher rates of co-morbidities including congestive heart failure (77.8% vs 31.1%, p< 0.001), cardiac arrhythmias (73.7% vs 27.7%, p< 0.001), valvular disease (17.9% vs 9.9%, p< 0.001), peripheral vascular disorders (42.6% vs 8.0%, p< 0.001), and complicated hypertension (52.2% vs 34.4%, p< 0.001). Despite a lower prevalence of patients with CS, we observed a similar in-hospital mortality rate between CS vs PS patients (2.4% vs 2.8%, p=0.219). Moreover, 30-day readmissions were comparable between the two groups (12.5% vs 11.9%, p=0.4). The most common causes of 30-day readmission in CS were heart failure exacerbation (55.62%), sepsis (11.99%), and cardiac implantable electronic device complications (2.74%). Amongst patients with PS, the most common causes of readmission were sepsis (15.46%), heart failure exacerbation (7.13%), and acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (5.44%). While length of stay was grossly comparable between the two groups, we observed that patients with CS had higher total charges as compared to their counterparts with PS ($59520 vs $40249, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Despite a significantly lower prevalence of CS, these patients had a higher cardiovascular disease burden at baseline, with similar rates of in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions when compared to patients with PS. The results from this study shed light on the increased acuity, complexity, and higher health care costs in patients with CS when compared to PS despite its lower prevalence. Further studies are needed to better understand this disease process to improve outcomes. 

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Characteristics of Patients with Pulmonary vs Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Mortality and Readmissions Rates

Supporting image 3

Figure 2: Baseline Co-morbidities


Disclosures: S. Chaudhary: None; K. Gokul: None; K. Patel: None; S. Bhimani: None; Y. Deshpande: None; A. Kilian: None; R. Nayak: None; D. Mikhalkova: None; C. Rojulpote: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chaudhary S, Gokul K, Patel K, Bhimani S, Deshpande Y, Kilian A, Nayak R, Mikhalkova D, Rojulpote C. Understanding the Prevalence, In-Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates Amongst Pulmonary vs Cardiac Sarcoidosis Patients: Insights from a Nationwide Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-the-prevalence-in-hospital-mortality-and-readmission-rates-amongst-pulmonary-vs-cardiac-sarcoidosis-patients-insights-from-a-nationwide-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-the-prevalence-in-hospital-mortality-and-readmission-rates-amongst-pulmonary-vs-cardiac-sarcoidosis-patients-insights-from-a-nationwide-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology