ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 341

Understanding Perceptions and Experience of Gout through Linguistic Analysis of Online Search Activities

Kayla Jordan1, James Pennebaker1, Keith Petrie2 and Nicola Dalbeth2, 1University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Education, patient and gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Online search engines are widely used to seek information about disease and management strategies. The aim of this study was to understand what terms people seeking information about gout use most frequently in their online searches and to explore the psychological and emotional tone of these searches using a linguistic analysis of their search histories. 

Methods: In cooperation with Microsoft Research, a large de-identified dataset of search histories from 200,000 consenting individuals was obtained from ComScore, a web analytics company, covering a two year period (2011 to 2013).  Time-stamped search terms were logged from all major search engines (e.g., Google, Bing).  From the larger dataset, three groups were identified: participants who searched for gout at least once (n = 1,388), participants who had searched for arthritis (arthritis control group, n = 2,289, matched to the gout group on age and sex), and a random set of participants matched on age and sex (general control group, n = 2,150).  Meaning Extraction Helper (Boyd, 2016), a word frequency software, was used to calculate search term frequencies from the search history of each participant.  Group membership was correlated with individual word frequencies.  Search terms were further analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC; Pennebaker, Boyd, Jordan, & Blackburn, 2015), a text analysis software from which psychological processes can be inferred from the words people use. 

Results: The most frequent unique searches in the gout group included gout-related and food-related terms (including uric, kidney, meats, purine, and atkins).  Those who searched for gout were more likely to search for words related to eating or avoidance.  In contrast, those who searched for arthritis were more likely to search for disease or health-related words. In the LIWC analysis, compared with the general control group, total word count was higher for the gout and arthritis groups, indicating higher information seeking by both groups.  Both the gout and arthritis groups searched more for health (e.g., clinic, flu, pill) and ingest (e.g., dish, eat, pizza) words, and fewer social (e.g. family, talk, they), leisure (e.g., cook, chat, movie), and sexual (e.g. love, sex) words.  Compared with the general control group, the searches of both the gout and arthritis groups were lower in positive emotion tone and higher in sadness words.  There were very few differences between the gout and arthritis groups in the LIWC analysis, with the exception of higher use of health words by the arthritis group and higher use of insight words (e.g., know, learn, and means) by the gout group.

Conclusion: People searching about gout or arthritis have high levels of information seeking.  The perception of gout as a condition managed by dietary strategies aligns with online information-seeking about the disease and its management.  In contrast, people searching about arthritis are more focused on searching about medical strategies. Linguistic analysis reflects greater disability in social and leisure activities and lower positive emotion for those searching for medical conditions such as gout or arthritis.


Disclosure: K. Jordan, None; J. Pennebaker, LIWC, 4; K. Petrie, None; N. Dalbeth, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jordan K, Pennebaker J, Petrie K, Dalbeth N. Understanding Perceptions and Experience of Gout through Linguistic Analysis of Online Search Activities [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-perceptions-and-experience-of-gout-through-linguistic-analysis-of-online-search-activities/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-perceptions-and-experience-of-gout-through-linguistic-analysis-of-online-search-activities/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology