ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2206

Understanding Inter-rater Variability in Scoring of Entheseal Lesions: Results from the Diagnostic Ultrasound Enthesitis Tool (DUET) Study

Lihi Eder1, Fangya Ma2, Josefina Marin3, Minna Kohler4, Janeth Yinh5, Ari Polachek6, Marcos Rosemffet7, Ernesto Rodriguez8, Ilaria Tinnazzi9, Amir Haddad10, Philippe Carron11, Mariana Alves Ferreira Martins12, Catherine Bakewell13, Fahmeen J. Afgani14, Richard Cook2, Sibel Aydin15 and Gurjit S. Kaeley16, 1Women’s College Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 3Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 6Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, 7Rheumatology Unit, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Capital Federal, Argentina, 8Florida Medical Clinic, Tampa, FL, 9Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy, 10Carmel Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel, 11Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, 12São José Do Rio Preto Medical School, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil, 13Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, 14Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 15University of Ottawa, Rheumatology, Ottawa, Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 16UF COM-J, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Imaging, Measurement, Psoriatic arthritis, Spondyloarthropathies, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Variability in scoring of sonographic entheseal lesions may be influenced by patient characteristics and sonographer expertise. We aimed to assess inter-rater agreement in scoring elementary lesions of enthesitis between central and local readers and factors influencing variability in scoring.

Methods: DUET is an international multicenter study that aims to develop a novel sonographic scoring system for enthesitis to assist with diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients with PsA, psoriasis alone and non-psoriatic controls underwent an ultrasound assessment of 16 entheseal sites in the upper and lower extremities by local sonographers. Each set of scans was stored as short DICOM clips, scored locally and then sent for central scoring by two out of three central sonographers. The local and central sonographers participated in pre-study training to ensure standard acquisition and scoring of elementary lesions of enthesitis following accepted definitions (Figure 1). The following lesions were scored on a semi-quantitative scale: hypoechogenicity (0-1), thickening (0-1), calcification (0-3), enthesophyte (0-3), erosion (0-1), vascularization (0-3) and bursitis (0-2). We assessed the raw agreement (%) and Kappa statistics between the central readers and between central and local readers for the different elementary lesions. The effect of age, sex, obesity and disease category on agreement was assessed by performing series of subgroup analyses.

Results: A total of 161 patients (2,576 entheses) were analyzed (88 PsA, 41 psoriasis, 32 controls). 47.8% were above the age of 50, 52.8% females and 47.8% were obese. Hypoechogenicity and enthesophytes were the most common elementary lesions while erosions and vascularization were the least common (Table 1). Highest raw agreement was found for erosion (92.8%-95.9%) and vascularization (94.1%-95.2%). Among central readers, inter-rater agreement (by Kappa) ranged from moderate to substantial for all elementary lesions being highest for enthesophytes (0.71) and vascularization (0.70) and lowest for thickening (0.43) and calcifications (0.43) (Table 1). Inter-rater agreement was numerically lower for central vs. local readers for most lesions. Most patient characteristics did not have a substantial influence on inter-rater agreement among central readers for entheseal elementary lesions (Figure 1). Kappa scores tended to be numerically lower in obese patients for most elementary lesions.

Conclusion: Moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement was achieved for most sonographic elementary lesions especially among central readers. Inter-rater agreement is not influenced by most patient characteristics apart from obesity which may increase variability in scoring.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Eder, AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer; F. Ma, None; J. Marin, AbbVie/Abbott, UCB, Janssen, Novartis; M. Kohler, Setpoint Medical, Springer; J. Yinh, None; A. Polachek, None; M. Rosemffet, AbbVie/Abbott, Novartis, Sandoz, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Pfizer, Raffo; E. Rodriguez, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Horizon, Sanofi; I. Tinnazzi, None; A. Haddad, None; P. Carron, Biogen, AbbVie/Abbott, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Merck/MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB; M. Alves Ferreira Martins, AbbVie/Abbott, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Pfizer; C. Bakewell, AbbVie/Abbott, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, UCB; F. Afgani, None; R. Cook, None; S. Aydin, None; G. Kaeley, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Ma F, Marin J, Kohler M, Yinh J, Polachek A, Rosemffet M, Rodriguez E, Tinnazzi I, Haddad A, Carron P, Alves Ferreira Martins M, Bakewell C, Afgani F, Cook R, Aydin S, Kaeley G. Understanding Inter-rater Variability in Scoring of Entheseal Lesions: Results from the Diagnostic Ultrasound Enthesitis Tool (DUET) Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-inter-rater-variability-in-scoring-of-entheseal-lesions-results-from-the-diagnostic-ultrasound-enthesitis-tool-duet-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/understanding-inter-rater-variability-in-scoring-of-entheseal-lesions-results-from-the-diagnostic-ultrasound-enthesitis-tool-duet-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology