ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1677

Two-week Break in Methotrexate Treatment and COVID-19 Vaccine Response. Results of the Vaccine Response on off Methotrexate (VROOM) Study, an Open Label, Prospective, Two-arm Parallel-group, Multi-center, Superiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abhishek Abhishek1, Nicholas Peckham2, Corinna Pade3, Joseph Gibbons3, Lucy Cureton2, Anne Francis2, Vicki Barber2, Jennifer Williams2, duncan Appelbe2, lucy Eldridge2, patrick Julier2, daniel Altmann4, James Bluett5, Tim Brooks6, Laura Coates2, ines Rombach7, Amanda Semper6, Ashley Otter6, Ana Valdes1, Jonathan Nguyen-Van-Tam1, Hywel Williams1, Aine McKnight3, Rosemary Boyton4 and jonathan Cook2, 1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, 4Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 5University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 6UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, United Kingdom, 7University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, COVID-19, Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: Abstracts: RA – Treatments II: RA Treatment Safety

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-5:30PM

Background/Purpose: Immunosuppressive treatments inhibit vaccine-induced immunity. We evaluated if a two-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after COVID-19 booster improved antibody response against spike protein of the receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) and live virus neutralization (ancestral Wuhan and Omicron BA.1) in patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).

Methods: We conducted an open-label, prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled, superiority trial in 26 UK hospitals. Adults attending Rheumatology and Dermatology clinics taking methotrexate (≤25mg/week) for ≥3 month for inflammatory conditions were randomly assigned 1:1 using minimization to suspend or continue methotrexate treatment for two-weeks immediately after their COVID-19 booster. Data were analyzed using an intention to treat approach.

Results: 383 participants (mean age 59.0 years, 61% female) were randomized to either suspend or continue methotrexate arms. 61.4% (n=235) were female, 54.3% (n=208) had RA, 31.9% (n=122) psoriasis with/without arthritis. The median methotrexate dose was 20 mg/week. 94.5% (n=362) received a mRNA vaccine booster, mean 178 days after the second dose of the primary vaccination. Adherence to the intervention was high with 96.3% (n=184) and 97.4% (n=187) self-reported adherence with allocation in the suspend and continue methotrexate groups respectively.

At four-weeks, the geometric mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) S1-RBD antibody level was 25,413(22,227-29,056) and 12,326(10,538-14418) U/mL in suspend and continue treatment groups respectively, with geometric mean ratio (GMR)(95%CI) 2.08(1.59-2.70), p< 0.0001, mixed-effects model. The increase in antibody response was consistent across age-groups, methotrexate doses, route, IMIDs, primary vaccination platform, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Enhanced antibody responses were sustained at 12 and 26 weeks with GMR(95%CI) 1.88(1.44-2.46) and 1.50(1.12-2.01) respectively. Planned exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a greater treatment effect at higher methotrexate dose (Interaction GMR effect (95% CI) 0.67(0.47, 0.96) at 4-weeks and 0.64(0.420.96) at 12-weeks).

The Wuhan Hu-1 IC50 neutralizing antibody titer was higher in the methotrexate suspend group compared to the continue treatment group at four and 26-weeks. In a mixed-effect model, the GMR (95% CI) for Wuhan Hu-1 IC50 neutralizing antibody titer on suspending methotrexate for two-weeks was 2.56 (1.21-5.44) at 4 weeks, and 3.50 (1.34-9.18) at 26-weeks. The Omicron BA.1 IC50 cross neutralizing antibody titer was higher in the methotrexate suspend group compared to the continue treatment group at 4-weeks with GMR (95% CI) 2.42 (1.45-4.05).

There were no differences in quality of life. Self-reported disease activity deteriorated slightly at 4-weeks in the suspend methotrexate group, but normalized by week-12.

Conclusion: Two-week interruption of methotrexate treatment for IMIDs enhanced boosting of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination that were sustained at 12 and 26 weeks. (Trial registration: ISRCTN11442263)

Supporting image 1

Serological outcomes at primary and secondary endpoints

Supporting image 2

Self-reported clinical outcomes


Disclosures: A. Abhishek: Cadilla Pharmaceuticals, 12, lecture fees, Inflazome, 2, Limbic, 2, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, 2, Springer, 9, UpTodate, 9; N. Peckham: None; C. Pade: None; J. Gibbons: None; L. Cureton: None; A. Francis: None; V. Barber: None; J. Williams: None; d. Appelbe: None; l. Eldridge: None; p. Julier: None; d. Altmann: None; J. Bluett: Fresenius Kabi, 12, Travel/conference fees, Pfizer, 5; T. Brooks: None; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; i. Rombach: None; A. Semper: None; A. Otter: None; A. Valdes: None; J. Nguyen-Van-Tam: AstraZeneca, 6, Janssen, 2, Moderna, 2, Sanofi Pasteur, 6; H. Williams: National Institute of Health and Care Research, 4; A. McKnight: None; R. Boyton: None; j. Cook: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Abhishek A, Peckham N, Pade C, Gibbons J, Cureton L, Francis A, Barber V, Williams J, Appelbe d, Eldridge l, Julier p, Altmann d, Bluett J, Brooks T, Coates L, Rombach i, Semper A, Otter A, Valdes A, Nguyen-Van-Tam J, Williams H, McKnight A, Boyton R, Cook j. Two-week Break in Methotrexate Treatment and COVID-19 Vaccine Response. Results of the Vaccine Response on off Methotrexate (VROOM) Study, an Open Label, Prospective, Two-arm Parallel-group, Multi-center, Superiority, Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/two-week-break-in-methotrexate-treatment-and-covid-19-vaccine-response-results-of-the-vaccine-response-on-off-methotrexate-vroom-study-an-open-label-prospective-two-arm-parallel-group-multi-cen/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/two-week-break-in-methotrexate-treatment-and-covid-19-vaccine-response-results-of-the-vaccine-response-on-off-methotrexate-vroom-study-an-open-label-prospective-two-arm-parallel-group-multi-cen/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology