ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1706

Twenty-four-week Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled First-in-Human Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Neurostimulation with a Miniaturized Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device in Patients with Multidrug-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Norman Gaylis1, Mark Genovese2, David Sikes3, Alan Kivitz4, Diane Horowitz5, Charles Peterfy6, Yaakov Levine7 and David Chernoff8, 1Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties, Aventura, FL, 2Stanford University, Sunnyvale, CA, 3Florida Medical Clinic, Wesley Chapel, FL, 4Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 5Northwell Health, Jericho, NY, 6Spire Sciences, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 7SetPoint Medical, Manhassest, NY, 8SetPoint Medical, Sausalito, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis, Therapy, alternative

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: RA Treatments & Their Safety (1674–1710)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) activates innate neuroimmune reflexes that have been shown to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and clinical disease activity in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Koopman PNAS 2016). We previously reported primary clinical outcomes from a first-in-human, double-blind study of a novel, implanted VNS device called a MicroRegulator (MR). That study showed 5/10 subjects with drug-refractory RA met or exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in DAS28-CRP; 2 subjects achieved DAS28 remission (DAS28-CRP < 2.6); and pro-inflammatory cytokines were decreased by >30% following 12 weeks of VNS (Genovese et al. Lancet Rheum 2020). We now report 24-week efficacy and safety findings from this study.

Methods: The primary study was enrolled in 2 stages: Stage 1 (n=3) was open-label, and Stage 2 (n=11) was randomized and sham-controlled (Figure 1). Three weeks after MR implantation, the first 3 subjects were stimulated 1 min QD in Stage 1. Following safety review board approval, the remaining 11 patients were implanted with the MR and randomized to 1 min of sham, QD, or QID VNS in Stage 2. At Week 12, the blind was lifted, sham subjects were re-randomized to either QD or QID active VNS dosing, and all actively treated subjects remained on their dosing through Week 24. Safety and tolerability were assessed, and several secondary efficacy endpoints were evaluated measuring the change in disease activity from the start of VNS to Week 24.

Results: There were no device-related adverse events from Week 12 through Week 24. Improvement in clinical disease activity was sustained through Week 24: 5/9 patients within the original treatment groups met or exceeded EULAR response criteria for DAS28-CRP at Week 24 vs. 5/10 at Week 12 (one Week 12 responder was lost to follow-up). Similarly, 6/9 patients in the original treatment groups met or exceeded the MCID in CDAI at Week 24 vs. 5/10 at Week 12. In the long-term extension, 1/4 sham crossover patients had both EULAR and CDAI response after 12 weeks of VNS (1/2 QD, 0/2 QID). VECTRA composite scores and component analysis revealed an 18-point drop in median multi-analyte disease activity index in the QD group over 24 weeks of VNS with a decrease in serum levels of several analytes in key component categories (IL-6, serum amyloid A, and VCAM-1). Erosion progression by hand MRI was stabilized or decreased in all but 1 of the stimulated patients at Week 24.

Conclusion: Improvements in clinical disease activity, pro-inflammatory cytokine suppression, and joint preservation were maintained through 24 weeks of VNS treatment. Safety outcomes continue to support the risk/benefit profile of VNS as a treatment option for patients with RA with inadequate responses or intolerance to conventional DMARDS and biologic and targeted synthetic drugs.

Figure 1: Study Schematic.

Figure 2: Change in DAS28-CRP at Week 24. Open shapes represent EULAR good and moderate responders. Red shapes represent subjects with a biologic added back as co-therapy with VNS.


Disclosures: N. Gaylis, None; M. Genovese, Setpoint, 2, Gilead, 3; D. Sikes, Myriad, 2, Abbvie, 6; A. Kivitz, Pfizer, 2, 6, 11, 12, Sanofi, 2, 6, 11, 12, GlaxoSmithKline, 11, Gilead Sciences, Inc.,, 2, 11, Novartis, 2, 6, 12, AbbVie, 2, 6, 11, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Janssen, 2, Regeneron, 2, 6, 12, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, 2, Amgen, 11, Lilly, 6, Celgene, 6, 12, Flexion, 2, 6, Genzyme, 2, 6, 12, Merck, 6, 12, UCB, 6, Horizon, 6, 12; D. Horowitz, None; C. Peterfy, Spire Sciences, 3, 8, Amgen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Aclaris, 2, Centrexion, 2, Daiichi Sankyo, 2, EMD Serono, 2, Five Prime Therapeutics, 2, Flexion Therapeutics, 2, Genentech, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Istresso, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Myriad, 2, Novartis, 2, Roche, 2, Setpoint, 2, Sorrento, 2, UCB, 2; Y. Levine, Setpoint Medical, 3; D. Chernoff, Setpoint Medical, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gaylis N, Genovese M, Sikes D, Kivitz A, Horowitz D, Peterfy C, Levine Y, Chernoff D. Twenty-four-week Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled First-in-Human Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Neurostimulation with a Miniaturized Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device in Patients with Multidrug-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/twenty-four-week-follow-up-of-a-randomized-controlled-first-in-human-trial-of-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-neurostimulation-with-a-miniaturized-vagus-nerve-stimulation-device-in-patients-with-multidrug/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/twenty-four-week-follow-up-of-a-randomized-controlled-first-in-human-trial-of-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-neurostimulation-with-a-miniaturized-vagus-nerve-stimulation-device-in-patients-with-multidrug/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology